A Message Passing System with Faulty Node Identification for Mobile Agents
Mobile agents are programs that can migrate from host to host in a network, at times and to places decided by the agent. These loosely-coupled decentralized systems widely use broadcast as an important communication mechanism to pass control signals, share resources, notify urgent messages etc. The main problem with flooding is the redundant broadcast messages, which constitute great network load, thereby decreasing the speed of delivery of messages and the entire network as such. In the context of mobile agents, fault tolerance is crucial to enable the integration of mobile agent technology into today’s business applications. This paper proposes a broadcast technique based on the broadcasting algorithm by Peter Merz, for passing messages between the mobile agents and also detects faulty agents and adapts accordingly, based on the algorithm put forth by JayaDev Misra, the results are proved by simulating the model.
KeywordsMobile agents broadcasting fault detection message-passing distributed applications flooding
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.De Capitani di Vimercati, S., Ferrero, A., Lazzaroni, M.: A Mobile Agent Platform For Remote Measurements. In: IMTC 2005 – Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Ottawa, vol. 1, pp. 570–575 (2005)Google Scholar
- 2.Merz, P., Gorunova, K.: Efficient Broadcast in P2P Grids. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid (CCGrid 2005), Cardiff, UK (2005) (online paper)Google Scholar
- 4.Murphy, A.L., et al.: Tracking Mobile Units for Dependable Message Delivery. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 433–448 (2002)Google Scholar
- 5.Murphy, A.L., Roman, G.-C., Varghese, G.: Algorithms for Message Delivery in a Micromobility Environment. Technical Report WUCS98-02, Washington, Univ. St. Louis, Mo. (February 1998)Google Scholar
- 6.Dijkstra, E.W., Scholten, C.: Termination Detection for Diffusing Computations. Information Processing Letters 11(1) (1980)Google Scholar