Skip to main content

A Model-Driven Approach to Uncertainty Reduction in Environmental Data

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Information Technologies in Environmental Engineering

Part of the book series: Environmental Science and Engineering ((ENVENG,volume 3))

Abstract

Environmental simulation modeling is inherently linked to observation data on the status of the environment. Data are a limiting factor in the selection of a model suitable for sustainable decision making. Models transform observation data into information by extracting aggregate values from raw data, projecting values of selected environmental indicators and detecting trends to track changes in environmental conditions. The chapter describes the framework for a model-driven development of sampling programs on the quality of the aquatic environment. Monitoring designs are determined as solutions of the operation research models articulated based on the cost-effectiveness analysis. The uncertainty of the estimates derived from monitoring data is used as a measure of the effectiveness of a monitoring design. Since data collected for one set of objectives can be used for the purposes which were not even considered at the planning stage, simple random designs are preferable. The proposed approach takes into account existing sampling procedures, models used for data analysis and uncertainty associated with the collected data. The approach has been used to develop efficient simple random designs common for all water quality parameters which are detected from the same water sample. The designs were built using linear regression models which improved the observation programs by reducing the numbers of required samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Campolongo F, Saltelli A., Sørensen T, Tarantola S (2000) Hitchhiker’s guide to sensitivity analysis. In: Saltelli A, Chan K, Scott EM (eds) Sensitivity Analysis, Chichester: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  2. Conn AR, Gould NIM, Toint PL (1997) A globally convergent augmented Lagrangian algorithm for optimization with general constraints and simple bounds. Mathematics of Computation 66(217): 261 – 288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cuadros-Rodriguez L, Hernandez Torres ME, Almansa Lopez E, Egea Gonzalez FJ, Arrebola Liebanas FJ, Martinez Vidal JL (2002) Assessment of uncertainty in pesticide multiresidue analytical methods: main sources and estimation. Analytica Chimica Acta 454:297-314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Environment Canada (2005) Knowledge Integration Strategic Division National Environmental Indicator Series. Online URL http://www.ec.gc.ca/soer-ree/English/Indicators.

  5. Erechtchoukova MG, Khaiter PA. (2010) Efficiency Criteria for Water Quality Monitoring. In: Swayne DA, Yang W, Voinov AA, Rizzoli AE, Filatova T (eds) 2010 International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software Modelling for Environment’s Sake, Fifth Biennial Meeting, 5 – July 2010, Ottawa, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  6. Erechtchoukova MG, Khaiter PA. (2009) Investigation of Monitoring Designs for Water Quality Assessment In: Anderssen, B. et al. (Eds.),18th IMACS World Congress - MODSIM09 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, 13-17 July 2009, Cairns, Australia,

    Google Scholar 

  7. Erechtchoukova MG, Khaiter PA. (2008) Role of models for building an efficient monitoring design. In: Sànchez-Marrè M, Béjar J, Comas J, Rizzoli AE, Guariso G (eds) iEMSs2008: International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software. Integrating Sciences and Information Technology for Environmental Assessment and Decision Making, July 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Erechtchoukova MG & Khaiter PA. (2007) Data-model issues in environmental impact assessment The International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability 3 (6): 149-156

    Google Scholar 

  9. Erechtchoukova MG, Chen SY, Khaiter PA (2009) Application of Optimization Algorithms for the Improvement of Water Quality Monitoring Systems. In: Athanasiadis IN, Mitkas PA, Rizzoli AE, Marx Gomez J. (eds) Information Technologies in Environmental Engineering Proc. of the 4th International ICSC Symposium Thessaloniki, Greece, May 28-29, 2009. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  10. EU (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gleser LJ (1998) Assessing Uncertainty in Measurement. Statistical Science 13(3): 277-290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Groot S, Schilperoort T (1983) Optimization of water quality monitoring networks. Water Science and Technology 16: 275-287

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harmel RD, Cooper RJ, Slade RM, Haney R., Arnold JG (2006) Cumulative uncertainty in measured streamflow and water quality data for small watersheds. Transactions of the ASABE 49(3): 689-701

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Helmer R (1993) Water quality monitoring: national and international approaches. In: Int. Symp. Proc. Hydrochemistry 1993. Rostov-on-Don, Russia: IAHS Publ., 219: 3-17

    Google Scholar 

  15. ISO, 1993. Guide to Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, 1st ed. International Standard Organization, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jørgensen SE, Bendoricchio G (2001) Fundamentals of ecological modelling. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lettenmaier DP (1978) Design considerations for ambient stream quality monitoring. Water Resources Bulletin 14:884–902

    Google Scholar 

  18. Overton WS, Stehman SV (1995) Design implications of anticipated data uses for comprehensive environmental monitoring programmes. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 2:287-303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Richardson JR, Berish CW (2003) Data and information issues in modelling for resource management decision making: communication is the key. In: Dale VH (ed) Ecological modelling for resource management. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Robertson DM, Roerish ED (1999) Influence of various water quality sampling strategies on load estimates for small streams. Water Resources Research 35(12): 3747–3759

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shabman L, Smith E (2003) Implications of applying statistically based procedures for water quality assessment. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 129(4)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Statistics Canada (2008) Canadian environmental sustainability indicators 2007: Freshwater quality indicator. Data sources and methods. (Cat. N 16-256-X) Online URL http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/16-256-x/16-256-x2008000-eng.pdf

  23. Straškraba M, Gnauck AH (1985) Freshwater ecosystems: modelling and simulation. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  24. Strobol RO, Robillard PD, Shannon RD, Day RL, McDonnell A.J (2006) A water quality monitoring network design methodology for the selection of critical sampling points: Part I. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 112:137-158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ullrich, A., Volk, M., Schmidt, G., 2008. Influence of the uncertainty of monitoring data on model calibration and evaluation. In: Sànchez-Marrè M, Béjar J, Comas J, Rizzoli AE, Guariso G (eds) Proceedings of the iEMSs Fourth Biennial Meeting: International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software (iEMSs 2008). International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, Barcelona, Catalonia, July 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Urban D (2000) Using model analysis to design monitoring programs for landscape management and impact assessment. Ecological Applications 10(6):1820-1832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2003) Elements of a state water monitoring and assessment program (EPA 841-B-03-003), online URL http://www.epa.gov/owow/monitoring/elements/index.html,

  28. Whitfield PH (1988) Goals and data collection designs for water quality monitoring Water Resources Bulletin 24(4):775–780

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Erechtchoukova, M.G., Khaiter, P.A. (2011). A Model-Driven Approach to Uncertainty Reduction in Environmental Data. In: Golinska, P., Fertsch, M., Marx-Gómez, J. (eds) Information Technologies in Environmental Engineering. Environmental Science and Engineering(), vol 3. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19536-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics