Abstract
Cities and planning are intimately related; so much so that the notion ‘planning’ is commonly employed as shorthand to the more longer term ‘urban and regional planning’ (which is not the case with economic or social planning, for instance). A possible reason for this is that cities were always regarded as signs and symbols for the existence of strong central authority capable of planned action – in antiquity, walls, roads, canals, castles, fortresses, temples and the like, indicated a central authority that is capable of planning. The same holds true for today’s cities: their roads, pavements, highways, public institutions, civil centers, industrial zones and residential areas are often seen as the result of a dominant central authority that plans and controls the city.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Portugali, J. (2011). The Two Cultures of Planning. In: Complexity, Cognition and the City. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19451-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19451-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19450-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19451-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)