Advertisement

Wood Ash Effects on Soil Fauna and Interactions with Carbohydrate Supply: A Minireview

  • Jouni K. NieminenEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Wood ash effects on soil animals in a boreal forest ecosystem are reviewed focusing on recent results on interactive effects of wood ash and organic amendments, and laboratory microcosms as a tool to understand soil food webs are discussed. Loose wood ash can reduce the populations of enchytraeids, collembolans and mites, but increase nematode populations particularly in experimental laboratory ecosystems with little or no primary production. Recent studies indicate that the repressive effect on enchytraeids depends on carbon availability. Carbohydrate supply seemed to alleviate the negative wood ash effect on enchytraeid body size and abundance. The fact that carbon alleviated wood ash effects on enchytraeids without any change in pH supports the view that wood ash effects on soil animals are partly indirect consequences of altered food resources. Experimental evidence suggests that the negative wood ash effect on enchytraeids is partly linked to increased bacteria-to-fungi ratio after wood ash application, and that this may be counteracted by carbohydrate addition.

Keywords

Nematode Population Soil Animal Labile Carbon Carbon Availability Laboratory Microcosm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study was financially supported by the Runar Bäckström Foundation and the Maj and Tor Nessling Foundation. I appreciate the cooperation of the Jyväskylä Soil Ecology Group, help with Table 4.1 from J. Haimi, V. Huhta, M. Liiri and H. Setälä, and constructive comments on the manuscript by two anonymous reviewers.

References

  1. Abrahamsen G (1983) Effects of lime and artificial acid rain on the enchytraeid (Oligochaeta) fauna in coniferous forest. Holarct Ecol 6:247–254Google Scholar
  2. Aronsson KA, Ekelund NGA (2004) Biological effects of wood ash application to forest and aquatic ecosystems. J Environ Qual 33:1595–1605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bååth E, Lohm U, Lundgren B, Rosswall T, Söderström B, Sohlenius B, Wirén A (1978) The effect of nitrogen and carbon supply on the development of soil organism populations and pine seedlings: a microcosm experiment. Oikos 31:153–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bååth E, Berg B, Lohm U, Lundgren B, Lundkvist H, Rosswall T, Söderström B, Wirén A (1980) Effects of experimental acidification and liming on soil organisms and decomposition in a Scots pine forest. Pedobiologia 20:85–100Google Scholar
  5. Bååth E, Frostegård Å, Pennanen T, Fritze H (1995) Microbial community structure and pH response in relation to soil organic matter quality in wood-ash fertilized, clear-cut or burned coniferous forest soils. Soil Biol Biochem 27:229–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunn RM, Mikola J, Bol R, Bardgett RD (2006) Influence of microbial activity on plant-microbial competition for organic and inorganic nitrogen. Plant Soil 289:321–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eriksson H (1998) Short-term effects of granulated wood ash on forest soil chemistry in SW and NE Sweden. Scand J For Res 2:43–55Google Scholar
  8. Finnish Forest Industries Federation (2008) Forest industry’s environmental statistics. Statistics for 2006. http://www.forestindustries.fi
  9. Fritze H, Perkiömäki J, Saarela U, Katainen R, Tikka P, Yrjälä K, Karp M, Haimi J, Romantschuk M (2000) Effect of Cd-containing wood ash on the microflora of coniferous forest humus. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 32:43–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haimi J, Fritze H, Moilanen P (2000) Responses of soil decomposer animals to wood-ash fertilisation and burning in a coniferous forest stand. For Ecol Manage 129:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hakkila P, Kalaja H (1983) Puu – ja kuorituhkan palauttamisen tekniikka. Folia For 552:1–37Google Scholar
  12. Hanson CA, Allison SD, Bradford MA, Wallenstein MD, Treseder KK (2008) Fungal taxa target different carbon sources in forest soil. Ecosystems 11:1157–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hill PW, Farrar JF, Jones DL (2008) Decoupling of microbial glucose uptake and mineralization in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 40:616–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huhta V (1984) Response of Cognettia sphagnetorum (Enchytraeidae) to manipulation of pH and nutrient status in coniferous forest soil. Pedobiologia 27:245–260Google Scholar
  15. Huhta V (2007) The role of soil fauna in ecosystems: a historical review. Pedobiologia 50:489–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huhta V, Hyvönen R, Koskenniemi A, Vilkamaa A (1983) Role of pH in the effect of fertilization on Nematoda, Oligochaeta and microarthropods. In: Lebrun PH, Andre HM, De Medts A, Grégoire-Wibo C, Wauthy G (eds) New trends in soil biology. Proceedings of the VIII international colloquium of soil zoology, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. Dieu-Brichart, Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve, pp 61–73Google Scholar
  17. Huhta V, Hyvönen R, Koskenniemi A, Vilkamaa P, Kaasalainen P, Sulander M (1986) Response of soil fauna to fertilization and manipulation of pH in coniferous forests. Acta For Fenn 195:1–30Google Scholar
  18. Huhta V, Persson T, Setälä H (1998) Functional implications of soil fauna diversity in boreal forests. Appl Soil Ecol 10:277–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hyvönen R, Huhta V (1989) Effects of lime, ash and nitrogen fertilizers on nematode populations in Scots Pine forest soil. Pedobiologia 33:129–143Google Scholar
  20. Jokinen HK, Kiikkilä O, Fritze H (2006) Exploring the mechanisms behind elevated microbial activity after wood ash application. Soil Biol Biochem 38:2285–2291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kampichler C, Bruckner A, Kandeler E (2001) Use of enclosed model ecosystems in soil ecology: a bias towards laboratory research. Soil Biol Biochem 33:269–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Knapp BA, Insam H (2011) Recycling of biomass ashes – current technologies and future research needs. In: Insam H, Knapp BA (eds) Recycling of biomass ashes. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  23. Korpijärvi K, Mroueh U-M, Merta E, Laine-Ylijoki J, Kivikoski H, Järvelä E, Wahlström M, Mäkelä E (2009) Energiantuotannon tuhkien jalostaminen maarakennuskäyttöön. VTT Tiedotteita – research notes 2499. http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/tiedotteet/2009/T2499.pdf. Accessed 17 Aug 2010
  24. Koskenniemi A, Huhta V (1986) Effects of fertilization and manipulation of pH on mite (Acari) populations of coniferous forest soil. Rev Écol Biol Sol 23:271–286Google Scholar
  25. Liiri M, Setälä H, Haimi J, Pennanen T, Fritze H (2001) Influence of Cognettia sphagnetorum (Enchytraeidae) on birch growth and microbial activity, composition and biomass in soil with or without wood ash. Biol Fertil Soils 34:185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liiri M, Haimi J, Setälä H (2002a) Community composition of soil microarthropods of acid forest soils as affected by wood ash application. Pedobiologia 46:108–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liiri M, Setälä H, Haimi J, Pennanen T, Fritze H (2002b) Soil processes are not influenced by the functional complexity of soil decomposer food webs under disturbance. Soil Biol Biochem 34:1009–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liiri M, Ilmarinen K, Setälä H (2002c) The significance of Cognettia sphagnetorum (Enchytraeidae) on nitrogen availability and plant growth in wood ash-treated soil. Plant Soil 246:31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liiri M, Ilmarinen K, Setälä H (2007) Variable impact of enchytraeid worms and ectomycorrhizal fungi on plant growth in raw humus soil treated with wood ash. Appl Soil Ecol 35:174–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lindberg N, Engtsson JB, Persson T (2002) Effects of experimental irrigation and drought on the composition and diversity of soil fauna in a coniferous stand. J Appl Ecol 39:924–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lundkvist H (1998) Wood ash effects on enchytraeid and earthworm abundance and enchytraeid cadmium content. Scand J For Res 2:86–95Google Scholar
  32. Moore-Kucera J, Dick RP (2008) Application of 13C-labelled litter and root materials for in situ decomposition studies using phospholipid fatty acids. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2485–2493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nieminen JK (2002) No evidence of sensitivity to initial population size in a fungus-nematode soil food chain. Soil Biol Biochem 34:1821–1823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nieminen JK (2008a) Labile carbon alleviates wood ash effects on soil fauna. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2908–2910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nieminen JK (2008b) Linking food webs to ecosystem processes: piecewise linear models of soil microcosms. Ecol Model 217:87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nieminen JK (2009) Combined effects of loose wood ash and carbon on inorganic N and P, key organisms and the growth of grasses and conifers in a pot experiment. Plant Soil 317:155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nieminen JK (2010) Labile carbon effects on nematodes, enchytraeids and N mineralization in Norway spruce forest soil. Biol Fertil Soils 46:175–178. doi: 10.1007/s00374-009-0407-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nieminen JK, Haimi J (2010) Body size and population dynamics of enchytraeids with different disturbance histories and nutrient dynamics. Basic Appl Ecol 11(7):638–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nieminen JK, Setälä H (2001) Influence of carbon and nutrient additions on a decomposer food chain and the growth of pine seedlings in microcosms. Appl Soil Ecol 17:189–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nieminen M, Piirainen S, Moilanen M (2005) Release of mineral nutrients and heavy metals from wood and peat ash fertilizers: Field studies in Finnish forest soils. Scand J For Res 20:146–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nottingham AT, Griffiths H, Chamberlain PM, Stott AW, Tanner EVJ (2009) Soil priming by sugar and leaf-litter substrates: a link to microbial groups. Appl Soil Ecol 42:183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. O’Connor FB (1957) An ecological study of the enchytraeid worm population of a coniferous forest soil. Oikos 8:161–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Perkiömäki J, Fritze H (2002) Short and long-term effects of wood ash on the boreal forest humus microbial community. Soil Biol Biochem 34:1343–1353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pitman RM (2006) Wood ash use in forestry – a review of the environmental impacts. Forestry 79:563–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pokarzhevskii AD, Persson T (1995) Effects of oxalic acid and lime on the enchytraeid Cognettia sphagnetorum (VEJD) in mor humus. Water Air Soil Pollut 85:1045–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Scheu S (2002) The soil food web: structure and perspectives. Eur J Soil Biol 38:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schmidt IK, Michelsen A, Jonasson S (1997) Effects of labile carbon on nutrient partitioning between an arctic graminoid and microbes. Oecologia 112:557–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sparling GP, Williams BL (1986) Microbial biomass in organic soils: estimation of biomass C, and effect of glucose or cellulose amendments on the amounts of N and P released by fumigation. Soil Biol Biochem 18:507–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Standen V (1982) Associations of Enchytraeidae (Oligochaeta) in experimentally fertilized grasslands. J Anim Ecol 51:501–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Steenari B-M, Lindqvist O (1997) Stabilisation of biofuel ashes for recycling to forest soil. Biomass Bioenergy 13:39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Szili-Kovács T, Török K, Tilston EM, Hopkins DW (2007) Promoting microbial immobilization of soil nitrogen during restoration of abandoned agricultural fields by organic additions. Biol Fertil Soils 43:823–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Van Hees PAW, Jones DL, Godbold DL (2002) Biodegradation of low molecular weight organic acids in coniferous forest podzolic soils. Soil Biol Biochem 34:1261–1272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vilkamaa P, Huhta V (1986) Effects of fertilization and pH on communities of Collembola in pine forest soil. Ann Zool Fenn 23:167–174Google Scholar
  54. Zimmermann S, Frey B (2002) Soil respiration and microbial properties in an acid forest soil: effects of wood ash. Soil Biol Biochem 34:1727–1737CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological and Environmental ScienceUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations