Abstract
In the paper we show that the second round candidates of the NIST hash competition differ up to 22 % in their power consumption. We perform a detailed analysis of the candidates with respect to different performance parameters. Finally, we discuss the time, the power consumption, and the energy per byte as criteria to distinguish the candidates with respect to the performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Kaps, J.P., Sunar, B.: Energy comparison of aes and sha-1 for ubiquitous computing. In: Zhou, X., Sokolsky, O., Yan, L., Jung, E.-S., Shao, Z., Mu, Y., Lee, D.C., Kim, D.Y., Jeong, Y.-S., Xu, C.-Z. (eds.) EUC Workshops 2006. LNCS, vol. 4097, pp. 372–381. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Fettweis, G., Zimmermann, E.: Ict energy consumption - trends and challenges. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (2008)
Ruth, S.: Green it more than a three percent solution? IEEE Internet Computing 13(4), 74–78 (2009)
National Institute of Standards and Technology: Cryptographic hash algorithm competition, http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/ST/hash/sha-3/index.html (visited 09.05.2010)
VAMPIRE lab: Supercop: System for unified performance evaluation related to cryptographic operations and primitives, http://bench.cr.yp.to/supercop.html (visited 09.05.2010)
Potlapally, N.R., Ravi, S., Raghunathan, A., Jha, N.K.: Analyzing the energy consumption of security protocols. In: ISLPED 2003: Proceedings of the 2003 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, pp. 30–35. ACM, New York (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Westermann, B., Gligoroski, D., Knapskog, S. (2011). Comparison of the Power Consumption of the 2nd Round SHA-3 Candidates. In: Gusev, M., Mitrevski, P. (eds) ICT Innovations 2010. ICT Innovations 2010. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 83. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19325-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19325-5_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19324-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19325-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)