Skip to main content

Offering New Insights by Harmonizing Patents, Taxonomies and Linked Data

  • Chapter
Current Challenges in Patent Information Retrieval

Part of the book series: The Information Retrieval Series ((INRE,volume 29))

  • 1559 Accesses

Abstract

Patent classification schemes such as the International Patent Classification maintained by the World Intellectual Property Organization are of vital importance for patent searchers, because they usually act as an entry point for the search process. We present methods for augmenting patents by assigning them to classes of a different classification scheme, i.e. a science taxonomy derived from the Wikipedia Science Portal. For each scientific discipline contained in the portal, descriptive keywords are extracted from the linked Web pages. These keywords are used to identify relevant patents and associate them to the appropriate scientific disciplines. Additional to that we augment the patents with data sets from the Linking Open Data (LOD) project. The ontology and the data sets of the LOD cloud are part of the Patent Taxonomy Integration and Interaction Framework, which is a flexible approach allowing for the integration of different patent ontologies enabling a wide range of interaction methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://linkeddata.org/.

  2. 2.

    http://dbpedia.org/.

  3. 3.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_is_a_featured_portal.

  4. 4.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Science.

  5. 5.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microbiology.

  6. 6.

    http://lucene.apache.org/.

  7. 7.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spina_bifida.

  8. 8.

    http://ode.openlinksw.com/.

References

  1. Berners-Lee T (2009) Linked data. World Wide Web electronic publication. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData

  2. Davies J (2004) Wiki brainstorming and problems with Wiki based collaboration. Tech rep. URL http://www-users.cs.york.ac.uk/kimble/teaching/students/Jonathan_Davies/Jonathan_Davies.html

  3. Fall CJ, Törcsvári A, Benzineb K, Karetka G (2003) Automated categorization in the international patent classification. SIGIR Forum 37(1):10–25. URL http://www.acm.org/sigir/forum/S2003/CJF_Manuscript_sigir.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mukherjea S (2005) Information retrieval and knowledge discovery utilising a biomedical Semantic Web. Brief Bioinform 6(3):252–262. doi:10.1093/bib/6.3.252. URL http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/6/3/252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pesenhofer A, Edler S, Berger H, Dittenbach M (2008) Towards a patent taxonomy integration and interaction framework. In: PaIR’08: Proceeding of the 1st ACM workshop on patent information retrieval. ACM, New York, pp 19–24. URL http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1458572.1458578

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Precup L, O’Sullivan D, Cormican K, Dooley L (2005) Virtual team environment for collaborative research projects. Int J Innov Learn 3(18):77–94. doi:10.1504/IJIL.2006.008181. URL http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/ind/ijil/2005/00000003/00000001/art00006

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sah M, Hall W (2007) Building and managing personalized semantic portals. In: WWW’07: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, New York, pp 1227–1228. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1242572.1242779

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Voss J, Danowski P (2004) Bibliothek, information und dokumentation in der wikipedia. Information Wissenschaft und Praxis (8). URL http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00002566/

  9. Wanner L, Baeza-Yates R, Brügmann S, Codina J, Diallo B, Escorsa E, Giereth M, Kompatsiaris Y, Papadopoulos S, Pianta E, Piella G, Puhlmann I, Rao G, Rotard M, Schoester P, Serafini L, Zervaki V (2008) Towards content-oriented patent document processing. World Pat Inf 30(1):21–33. doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2007.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilkinson DM, Huberman BA (2007) Cooperation and quality in Wikipedia. In: WikiSym’07: Proceedings of the international symposium on Wikis. ACM, New York, pp 157–164. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1296951.1296968

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu J, Thom JA, Tam A (2007) Ontology evaluation using wikipedia categories for browsing. In: CIKM’07: Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM conference on conference on information and knowledge management. ACM, New York, pp 223–232. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1321440.1321474

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Zirn C, Nastase V, Strube M (2008) Distinguishing between instances and classes in the Wikipedia taxonomy. In: Hauswirth M, Koubarakis M, Bechhofer S (eds) Proceedings of the 5th European semantic web conference. LNCS. Springer, Berlin. URL http://www.eswc2008.org/final-pdfs-for-web-site/onl-4.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  13. W3c sweo linking open data community project (2009) World Wide Web electronic publication. http://esw.w3.org/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/LinkingOpenData

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Pesenhofer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Specific Terms for Spina bifida

Appendix: Specific Terms for Spina bifida

The following list of terms was automatically generated for the class Spina bifida using a document frequency of one:

abe, amniocentesis, anticonvulsant, arbel, armas, asbah, avrahami, azor, berghout, birthmark, blaine, blankets, blues, blurb, bobby, calegory, capra, cerebellum, childbearing, clayden, cordero, cystica, dekel, dimple, drapeau, dursun, dysmorphic, enveloping, erection, fortification, fotheringham, fridman, gros, guinness, guitarist, gwozdz, haemophilia, handicapped, hank, hazneci, hockey, incompletely, intrauterine, iwamoto, izci, jick, kalyon, kibar, kirillova, lipoma, lissauer, lucy, lumbosacral, mcdearmid, melendez, mellencamp, menachem, meningeal, meningocele, merello, mildest, milunsky, moms, mulinare, multivitamins, muraszko, musician, myelomeningocele, myeloschisis, nonimmigrants, numbness, occulta, olympian, ozgul, paralympian, periconceptional, phac, presacral, protrudes, pseudomeningocele, punk, racer, reba, recruits, retroperitoneum, roentgenographic, sacrococcyx, sascha, saxophonist, sbaa, schappell, skateboarder, songwriter, stillbirths, tanni, taskaynatan, torban, tsukimura, unfused, valproic, wakano, wallingford, websitemoms, wheelchair, worsening, yoder

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pesenhofer, A., Berger, H., Dittenbach, M. (2011). Offering New Insights by Harmonizing Patents, Taxonomies and Linked Data. In: Lupu, M., Mayer, K., Tait, J., Trippe, A. (eds) Current Challenges in Patent Information Retrieval. The Information Retrieval Series, vol 29. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19231-9_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19231-9_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19230-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19231-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics