Skip to main content

On Managing Complexity: Variety Engineering

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Organizational Systems
  • 2847 Accesses

Abstract

We, as individuals, are dealing with complex situations, that is, with situations challenging us with a large number of states changing rapidly and unpredictably over time. In all these situations to perform effectively we have to manage the complexity of the situation. This chapter is dedicated to explore principles for managing complexity. We take the view that in general managing complexity refers to our ability to achieve an adequate performance in particular situations of concern. Their boundaries are defined by the purposes we ascribe, implicitly or explicitly, to them. So, in this chapter we explore how we ascribe purposes to situations and why this is important for managing their complexity. The concepts and detailed methods we explain in this chapter are known as variety engineering, which is the key concept that guides our operational design of organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    At that time in Colombia the prosecution and trailing of criminal cases was in the hands of the courts.

  2. 2.

    Cognitive in this context relates to a person’s capabilities for making distinctions and also acting upon them; cognition is not only a mind activity, it is a total body activity.

  3. 3.

    These are similar to the three venues explained for the case of individual management of complexity.

  4. 4.

    These are processes that allow the company to create, produce and regulate its own tasks. We will develop in more detail this concept later on in Chapter 6.

References

  • Argyris C, Schön D (1978) Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley, Reading, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer S (1979) The heart of enterprise. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer S (1981) Death is equifinal. Society for general systems research 25th annual meeting. Toronto, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer S (1985) Diagnosing the system for organizations. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Espejo R (1989) The VSM revisited. In: Espejo R, Harnden R (eds) The viable system model: interpretations and applications of Stafford Beer's VSM. Wiley, Chichester, pp 77–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Espejo R (2000) Self-construction of desirable social systems. Kybernetes 29(7–8):949–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espejo R (2009) Performance management, the nature of regulation and the Cybersyn Project. Kybernetes 38(1/2):65–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espejo R, Howard N (1982) What is requisite variety? A re-examination of the foundation of Beer’s method. Working Paper Series: 242. Aston University, Birmingham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Espejo R, Watt J (1988) Information management, organization and managerial effectiveness. J Oper Res Soc 39(1):7–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Espejo R, Schuhmann W, Schwaninger M, Bilello U (1996) Organizational transformation and learning. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorbachev M (1987) Perestroika: new thinking for our country and the world. HarperCollins, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1979) Communication and the evolution of society. Beacon Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana H, Varela F (1992) The tree of knowledge. Shambhala, Boston, MA/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine I, Stengers I (1984) Order out of chaos. Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockart JF (1979) Chief executives define their own data needs. Harv Bus Rev (March–April):81–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott D (2009) Grown up digital. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott D, Lowy A, Ticoll D (1998) Blueprint to the digital economy: creating wealth in the era of e-business. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (2000) Reflective practice in the civil society: the contribution of critically systemic thinking. Reflective Pract 1(2):247–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker R (1992) Venues for contexture: a critical analysis and enactive reformulation of group decision support systems. Research Report UMADP –RRIPCS, Department of Administrative Data Processing /Informatics. Umeå Universitet, Umeå, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raul Espejo .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Espejo, R., Reyes, A. (2011). On Managing Complexity: Variety Engineering. In: Organizational Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19109-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics