Skip to main content

Inapproximability of b-Matching in k-Uniform Hypergraphs

  • Conference paper
WALCOM: Algorithms and Computation (WALCOM 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6552))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we analyze the complexity of the maximum cardinality b-matching problem in k-uniform hypergraphs. b-matching is the following problem: for a given b ∈ ℕ and a hypergraph \(\mathcal{H}=(V,\mathcal{E})\), |V| = n, a subset \(M\subseteq \mathcal{E}\) with maximum cardinality is sought so that no vertex is contained in more than b hyperedges of M. The b-matching problem is a prototype of packing integer programs with right-hand side b ≥ 1. It has been studied in combinatorics and optimization. Positive approximation results are known for b ≥ 1 and k-uniform hypergraphs (Krysta 2005) and constant factor approximations for general hypergraphs for b = Ω(logn), (Srinivasan 1999, Srivastav, Stangier 1996, Raghavan, Thompson 1987), but the inapproximability of the problem has been studied only for b = 1 and k-uniform and k-partite hypergraphs (Hazan, Safra, Schwartz 2006). Thus the range from b ∈ [2,logn] is almost unexplored. In this paper we give the first inapproximability result for k-uniform hypergraphs: for every 2 ≤ b ≤ k/logk there no polynomial-time approximation within any ratio smaller than \(\Omega(\frac{k}{b\log{k}})\), unless \(\mathcal{P}=\mathcal{NP}\). Our result generalizes the result of Hazan, Safra and Schwartz from b = 1 to any fixed 2 ≤ b ≤ k/logk and k-uniform hypergraphs. But the crucial point is that for the first time we can see how b influences the non-approximability. We consider this result as a necessary step in further understanding the non-approximability of general packing problems. It is notable that the proof of Hazan, Safra and Schwartz cannot be lifted to b ≥ 2. In fact, some new techniques and ingredients are required; the probabilistic proof of the existence of a hypergraph with ”almost” disjoint b-matching where dependent events have to be decoupled (in contrast to Hazan et al.) and the generation of some sparse hypergraph.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aronson, J., Dyer, M.E., Frieze, A.M., Suen, S.: Randomized greedy matching II. Random Structures and Algorithms 6(1), 55–74 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Arora, S., Lund, C., Motwani, R., Sudan, M., Szegedy, M.: Proof verification and intractability of approximation problems. Journal of the ACM 45, 501–555 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Arora, S., Safra, S.: Probabilistic checking of proofs: A new characterization of \(\mathcal{NP}\). Journal of the ACM 45, 70–122 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Füredi, Z., Kahn, J., Seymour, P.D.: On the fractional matching polytope of a hypergraph. Combinatorica 13(2), 167–180 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Gonen, R., Lehmann, D.J.: Optimal solutions for multi-unit combinatorial auctions: Branch and bound heuristics. CoRR cs.GT/0202032, 13–20 (2002); Presented at ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Håstad, J.: Some optimal inapproximability results. Journal of the ACM 48(4), 798–859 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Hazan, E., Safra, S., Schwartz, O.: On the complexity of approximating k-set packing. Computational Complexity 15(1), 20–39 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hochbaum, D.S.: Efficient bounds for the stable set, vertex cover and set packing problems. Discrete Applied Mathematics 6, 243–254 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hurkens, C.A.J., Schrijver, A.: On the size of the systems of sets every t of which have an sdr, with an application to the worst-case ratio of heuristics for packing problems. SIAM Journal Discrete Math. 2, 68–72 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Karp, R.M.: Reducibility among combinatorial problems. In: Miller, R.E., Thatcher, J.W. (eds.) Complexity of Computer Computations, pp. 85–103. Plenum Press, New York (1972)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Krysta, P.: Greedy approximation via duality for packing, combinatorial auctions and routing. In: Jedrzejowicz, J., Szepietowski, A. (eds.) MFCS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3618, pp. 615–627. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Bansal, N., Khot, S.: Inapproximability of hypergraph vertex cover and applications to scheduling problems. In: Abramsky, S., Gavoille, C., Kirchner, C., Meyer auf der Heide, F., Spirakis, P.G. (eds.) ICALP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6198, pp. 250–261. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Lovász, L.: On the ratio of optimal integral and fractional covers. Discrete Mathematics 13, 383–390 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Papadimitriou, C.: Computational Complexity. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Paschos, V.T.: A survey of approximately optimal solutions to some covering and packing problems. ACM Computing Surveys 29(2), 171–209 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Radhakrishnan, J., Ta-Shma, A.: Bounds for dispersers, extractors, and depth-two superconcentrators. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 13, 2–24 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Raghavan, P., Thompson, C.D.: Randomized rounding: a technique for provably good algorithms and algorithmic proofs. Combinatorica 7, 365–374 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Rödl, V., Thoma, L.: Asymptotic packing and the random greedy algorithm. Random Structures and Algorithms 8(3), 161–177 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Spencer, J.: Asymptotic packing via a branching process. Random Structures and Algorithms 7(2), 167–172 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Srinivasan, A.: Improved approximation guarantees for packing and covering integer programs. SIAM Journal on Computing 29(2), 648–670 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Srivastav, A., Stangier, P.: Algorithmic Chernoff-Hoeffding inequalities in integer programming. Random Structures and Algorithms 8(1), 27–58 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Trevisan, L.: Non-approximability results for optimization problems on bounded degree instances. In: Proc. of the 33rd ACM STOC (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

El Ouali, M., Fretwurst, A., Srivastav, A. (2011). Inapproximability of b-Matching in k-Uniform Hypergraphs. In: Katoh, N., Kumar, A. (eds) WALCOM: Algorithms and Computation. WALCOM 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6552. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19094-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19094-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19093-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19094-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics