Skip to main content

ATP Chemosensitivity Testing in Ovarian and Breast Cancer: Early Clinical Trials

  • Conference paper
Chemosensitivity Testing in Oncology

Abstract

After disappointing results achieved with older chemosensitivity tests such as the human tumor clonogenic assay (HTCA) during the 1980s, the last decade has seen a renaissance of the concept of individualized chemotherapy in oncology, markedly stimulated by the development of newer nonclonogenic assays. These methods appear to be able to overcome major technical limitations associated with older assays, now allowing for successful testing of most of the tumor specimens submitted. Currently, the ATP-based tumor chemosensitivity assay (ATP-TCA) can be regarded as the most sophisticated assay to investigate both solid samples and effusions derived from patients with various organ tumors.

During the last 5 years, the ATP-TCA has been used successfully to screen for novel drug combinations for further clinical use in both ovarian and breast cancer such as mitoxantrone plus paclitaxel (NT) and treosulfan plus gemcitabine (TG), respectively. Clinical trials that have been set up in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent ovarian or breast cancer have convincingly confirmed the high activity of these combinations previously demonstrated in preclinical investigations using the ATP-TCA. In a recent phase II trial performed in 59 patients with relapsed ovarian carcinoma, |ATP-TCA-directed therapy was able to triple the response rate and to double the survival time, compared with published empirical chemotherapy regimes. Preliminary results with ATP-TCA-directed therapy in breast cancer also evidenced promising response rates. These results have been confirmed by additional prospective clinical trials using other types of modern nonclonogenic assays. A phase III trial that is now actively recruiting patients with platinum-refractory ovarian cancer to verify the promising phase II studies will prove the further value of the ATP-TCA as a predictor applicable in routine clinical oncology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bellamy WT (1992) Prediction of response to drug therapy of cancer. A review of in vitro assays. Drugs 44:690–708

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cree IA, Kurbacher CM (1997) Individualizing chemotherapy for solid tumors — is there any alternative? Anti-Cancer Drugs 8:541–548

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. DeVita VT (1997) Principles of cancer management: chemotherapy. In: DeVita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA (eds) Cancer: principles and practice of oncology, 5th edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 333–347

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hamburger AW, Salmon SE (1977) Primary bioassay of human tumor stem cells. Science 197:161–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Von Hoff DD (1990) He’s not going to talk about in vitro predictive assays again, is he? J Natl Cancer Inst 82:97–101

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cortazar R, Johnson BE (1999) Review of the efficacy of individualized chemotherapy selected by in vitro drug sensitivity testing for patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:1625–1631

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown E, Markman M (1996) Tumor chemosensitivity and chemoresistance assays. Cancer 77:1020–1025

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Andreotti PE, Cree IA, Kurbacher CM et al (1995) Chemosensitivity testing of human tumors using a microplate adenosine triphosphate luminescence assay: clinical correlation for cisplatin resistance of ovarian carcinoma. Cancer Res 55:5276–5282

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cree IA, Kurbacher CM, Untch M et al (1996) Correlation of the clinical response to chemotherapy in breast cancer with ex vivo chemosensitivity. Anti-Cancer Drugs 7:630–635

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Konecny G, Cohns C, Pegram M et al (2000) Correlation of drug response with the ATP tumorchemosensitivity assay in primary FIGO stage III ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 77:258–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kurbacher CM, Bruckner HW, Cree IA et al (1997) Mitoxantrone combined with paclitaxel as salvage therapy for platinum-refractory ovarian cancer: laboratory study and clinical pilot trial. Clin Cancer Res 3:1527–1533

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Janát M, Kurbacher CM, Rein D et al (2000) Mitoxantrone plus paclitaxel: a highly active regimen for heavily pretreated ovarian cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 19:384a

    Google Scholar 

  13. Flaskamp C, Köhler S, Kurbacher C et al (1998) Kombinationschemotherapie des rezidivierten Ovarialkarzinoms mit Mitoxantron und Paclitaxel. Arch Gynecol Obstet 261 (Suppl 1):S17

    Google Scholar 

  14. Salimichokami M (2001) Weekly paclitaxel and mitoxantrone: a highly active salvage regimen for recurrent ovarian cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 20:214a

    Google Scholar 

  15. Neale MH, Myatt N, Cree IA et al (1999) Combination chemotherapy for choroidal melanoma: ex vivo sensitivity to treosulfan with gemcitabine or cytosine arabinoside. Br J Cancer 79:1487–1493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cree IA, Neale MH, Myatt NE et al (1999) Heterogeneity of chemosensitivity of metastatic cutaneous melanoma. Anti-Cancer Drugs 10:437–444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Grecu OM, Kurbacher CM, Mallmann P et al (2001) Treosulfan and gemcitabine in heavily pretreated patients with breast and ovarian cancer: laboratory study and clinical pilot trial of the ISCO Clinical Study Group. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 20:187b

    Google Scholar 

  18. Grecu OM, Kurbacher CM, Stier U et al (2001) Salvage therapy of patients with heavily pretreated breast and ovarian carcinoma: a clinical pilot trial based on results of an ex vivo study. Anti-Cancer Drugs 12 (Suppl 4):A15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nagourney RA, Su YZ, Link J et al (1998) Gemcitabine synergy with cisplatin. Clinical and laboratory correlates. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 39:310

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nagourney RA, Link JS, Blitzer JB et al (2000) Gemcitabine plus cisplatin repeating doublet therapy in previously treated, relapsed breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 18:2245–2249

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kurbacher CM, Cree IA, Bruckner HW et al (1998) Use of an ex vivo ATP luminescence assay to direct chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer. Anti-Cancer Drugs 9:51–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kurbacher CM, Stier U, Janát M et al (2001) ATP-assay-directed chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer: mature results of an ISCO Clinical Study Group Trial. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 20:184b

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kurbacher CM (2001) ATP chemosensitivity testing in ovarian cancer: early clinical trials. Anti-Cancer Drugs 12 (Suppl 4):A14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dottino R, Evans SS, Segna R et al (2000) EVA-assay directed therapy of advanced ovarian cancer. Proc Amer Soc Clin Oncol 19:387a

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kurbacher CM, Janát MM, Brenne U et al. Chemosensitivitätstestung beim Mammakarzinom. In: Untch M, Konecny G, Sittek H, et al (eds) Diagnostik und Therapie des Mammakarzinoms — State of the Art 2000. Zuckschwerdt, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  26. Xu JM, Song ST, Zang ZM et al (1999) Predictive chemotherapy of advanced breast cancer directed by MTT assay in vitro. Breast Cancer Res Treat 53:77–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kurbacher, C.M. et al. (2003). ATP Chemosensitivity Testing in Ovarian and Breast Cancer: Early Clinical Trials. In: Reinhold, U., Tilgen, W. (eds) Chemosensitivity Testing in Oncology. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 161. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19022-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19022-3_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-62412-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19022-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics