Zusammenfassung
In diesem Kapitel werden Grundlagen und Assessment-Verfahren zur Beurteilung sensorisch-integrativer Funktionen und der Praxie in der Ergotherapie beschrieben. Im Prozess der Befunderhebung werden spezifische Komponenten der Sensorischen Integration, die in Zusammenhang mit dem Beschäftigungsverhalten stehen, gemessen und überprüft. Formale und freie Beobachtungen des Verhaltens auf Anzeichen einer Sensorischen Integrationsstörung helfen der Therapeutin, zugrunde liegende Defizite wahrzunehmen, die sich auf die Handlungsperformanzauswirken.Die Interpretation dieser Ergebnisse dient als Richtschnur für die Intervention mit dem Ziel der Verbesserung der Performanz (Ayres 1972a).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Abidin, R.R. (1990). Parenting Stress Index (3rd ed.). Charlottesville, VA: Pediatric Psychology Press.
Achenbach, T.M., und Edelbrock, C. (1991 ). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and Revised Child Behavior Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
Ahern, C.A., und Grandison, C.M. (2000). Inclusivity in developmental neuropsychological assessment. Zero to Three, 20(4), 23–27.
American Occupational Therapy Association. (2000). The occupational therapy practice framework: Draft V. Bethesda, MD: Author.
Aylward, G.P. (1997). Conceptual issuesin developmental screening and assessment. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 18, 340–349.
Ayres, A.J. (1972a). Sensory integration and learning disorders, Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Ayres, A.J. (1972b). Southern California Sensory Integration Tests. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Ayres, A.J. (1979). Sensory integration and the child. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Ayres, A.J. (1989). Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Ayres, A.J., und Tickle, L.S. (1980). Hyper-responsivity to touch and vestibular stimuli as a predictor of positive response to sensory integration procedures by autistic children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 34, 375–381.
Bailey, D.G., Jr., und Wolery, M. (1989). Assessing infants and preschoolers with handicaps. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Company.
Bayley, N. (1993). The Bayley Scales of Infant Development (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Berk, R.A., und DeGangi, G.A. (1983). DeGangi-Berk Test of Sensory Integration. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Blanche, E.I. (2000). Utilizingclinical reasoning in the assessment of children with SI dysfunction. Videotape in preparation. Torrance, CA: Pediatric Therapy Network.
Blanche, E.I. (2001). The role of observations in the clinical reasoning process. Manuscript in preparation.
Blanche, E.I., Botticelli, T.M., und Hallway, M.K. (1995). Combining neurodevelopmental treatment and sensory integration principles: An approach to pediatric therapy. Tucson, AZ: Therapy Skill Builders.
Campbell, S.K (1995). Physical therapy for children. Philadelphia: WB. Saunders.
Carrasco, R.C., und Lee, C.E. (1993, September). Development of a teacher questionnaire on sensorimotor behavior. Sensory Integration Special Interest Section Newsletter, 16, 5–6.
Cohn, E.S., und Cermak, S. AUCH (1998). Including the family perspective in sensory integration outcomes research. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 540–545.
Cook, D.G. (1991). The assessment process. In W. Dunn (Ed.), Pediatric occupational therapy: Facilitating effective service provision (pp. 35–72). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
Coster, W. (1998). Occupation-centered assessment of children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 337–344.
Coster, W., Deeney, T., Haltiwanger, J., und Haley, S. (1998). School Function Assessment. San Antonio, TX: Therapy Skill Builders.
DeGangi, G.A., und Greenspan, S.I. (1989). Test of Sensory Functions in Infants. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Dunkerley, E., Tickle-Degnen, L., und Coster, W.J. (1997). Therapist-child interaction in the middle minutes of sensory integration treatment. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 799–805.
Dunn, W. (1994). Performance of typical children on the Sensory Profile: An item analysis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 967–974.
Dunn, W. (1999). Sensory Profile. San Antonio TX: Therapy Skill Builders.
Easley, A.M. (1996). Dynamic assessment for infants and toddlers: The relationship between assessment and the environment. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 8, 62–69.
Feuerstein, R. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Fisher, A.G., Murray, E.A., und Bundy, A.C. (1991). Sensory integration:Theory to practice. Philadelphia: FA. Davis Company.
A. Fisher, E. Murray, und A. Bundy (Hrsg) (2002). Sensorische Integrations-therapie. Theorie und Praxis. 2. Aufl. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York.
Folio, M.R., und Fewell, R.R. (2000). Peabody Developmental Motor Scales. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Gillette, N. (1991). Theissueis: Research directions for occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupation al Therapy, 45, 563–566.
Guyatt, G. H., Kirshner, B., und Jaeschke, R. (1992). Measuring health status: What are the necessary measurement properties? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 45, 1341–1345.
Haley, S.M., Baryza, M.J., und Blanchard, Y. (1993). Functional and naturalistic frameworks in assessing physical and motor disablement. In I.J. Wilhelm (Ed.), Physical therapy evaluation in early infancy (Clinics in Physical Therapy) (pp. 225–256). New York: Churchill Livingstone.
Haley, S.M., Coster, W.J., und Binda-Sundberg, K. (1994). Measuring physical disablement: The contextual challenge. Physical Therapy, 74, 74/443–82/451.
Haley, S.M., Coster, W.J., und Ludlow, L.H. (1991). Pediatric functional outcome measures. In G.H. Kraft und K.M. Jaffe (Eds.), Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America (pp. 689–723). Philadelphia: W.B.Saunders.
Haley, S.M., Coster, W.J., Ludlow, L.H., Haltiwanger, J.T., und Andrellos, P.J. (1992). Pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Boston: Boston University.
Hanft, B.E., Miller, L.J., und Lane, S.J. (2000). Toward a consensus in terminology in sensory integration theory and practice: Part 3: Observable behaviors: Sensory integration dysfunction. Sensory Integration Special interest Section Newsletter, 23(3), 1–4.
Henderson, S.E., und Sugden, D.A. (1992). Movement Assessment Battery for Children. London: Psychological Corporation, Ltd.
Hinojosa, J., und Kramer, P. (1998). Evaluation obtaining and interpreting data. Rockville, M D: American Occupational Therapy Association.
Johnson, K. (2000). Inclusive interaction in mental health consultation to the child care community. Zero to Three, 20(4), 15–18.
Jones, G., und Monkhouse-KIeuser, M.A. (1981). Balcones Sensory Integration Sceening (Rev. ed.). Austin, TX: Occupational Therapy Association, Inc
Jongbloed, L.E.,, Collins, J.B., und Jones, W. (1986). Sensorimotor Integration Test Battery. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 66, 131-150.
Keshner, E.A. (1991). How theoretical framework biases evaluation and treatment. In Contemporary management of motor problems (pp. 37–47). Alexandria, VA: Foundation for Physical Therapy.
Knox, S. (1997). Development and current use of the Knox preschool play scale. In L.D. Parham und Fazio, L. (Eds.). Play in Occupational Therapy for Children. St. Louis: Mosby-Times, Inc.
Koomar, J., Szklut, S.E., Ingolia, P., und OTA-Watertown Staff. (1995). Sensory modulation and discrimination evaluation. Unpublished manuscript.
Lane, S.J., Miller, L.J., und Hanft, B.E. (2000). Toward a consensus in terminology in sensory integration theory and practice: Part 2: Sensory integration patterns of function and dysfunction. Sensory Integration Special interest Section Newsletter, 23(2), 1–3.
Lidz, C.S. (1990). The preschool learning assessment device: An approach to the dynamic assessment of young children. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2, 167–175.
Lidz, C.S. (1991). Practitioner’s guide to dynamic assessment. New York: Guilford Press.
Lidz, C.S. (1995). Dynamic assessment and the legacy of L.S. Vygotsky. School Psychology, 16, 143–153.
May-Benson, T. (1997). introduction to dynamic assessment: A curriculum guide for occupational therapists. Unpublished manuscript, Boston University Sargent College, Boston.
McGourty, L., Foto, M., Smith, N., Smith, R., und Kronsnoble, S. (l989). Uniform terminology for occupational therapy (2nd ed.). Rockville, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
Meisels, S.J. (1996). Charting the continuum of assessment and intervention. In S.J. Meisels und E. Fenichel (Eds.), New visions for the developmental assessment of infants and young children (pp. 27–52). Washington, DC: Zero to Three.
Miller, L.J., und Lane, S.J. (2000). Toward a consensus in terminology in sensory integration theory and practice: Part 1:Taxonomy of neurophysiological processes. Sensory Integration Special Interest Section Newsletter, 23(1), 1–4.
Miller, L., und Roid, G.H. (1995). T.I.M.E-Toddler and Infant Motor Evaluation. Tucson, AZ: Therapy Skill Builders.
Missiuna, G., und Samuels, M.T. (1989). Dynamic assessment of preschool children with special needs: Comparison of mediation and instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 10, 53–62.
Morton, K., und Wolford, S. (1984). Analysis of Sensory Behavior inventory (Rev. ed.). Arcadia, CA: Skills with Occupational Therapy.
Mulligan, S. (1998a). Patterns of sensory integration dysfunction:a confirmatory factor analysis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 819–828.
Mulligan, S. (1998b). Application of structural equation modeling in occupational therapy research. American Occupational Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 829–834.
Parham, L.D. (1998). The relationship of sensory integrative development to achievementin elementary students: Four-year longitudinal patterns. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 18(3), 105–127.
Parham, L D., und Ecker, G. (2000). Evaluation of sensory processing. Manuscript in preparation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Parham, L.D., und Fazio, L. (1997). Play in occupational therapy for children. St. Louis: Mosby-Times, Inc.
Parham, L.D., und Mailloux, Z. (1996). Sensory integration. In J. Case-Smith, A.S. Allen, und P.N. Nuse (Eds.), Occupational therapy for children (3rd ed., pp. 307–356). St. Louis: Mosby.
Parham, D., Mailloux, Z., und Smith Roley, S. (2000). Sensory processing and praxis in high-functioning children with autism. Paper presented at Research 2000, February 4-5, 2000, Redondo Beach, CA.
Provost, B., und Oetter, P. (1993). The Sensory Rating Scale for Infants and Young Children: Development and reliability. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 13(4), 15–35.
Reisman, J.E., und Hanschu, B. (1992). Sensory Integration Inventory (Rev. ed.). Hugo, MN: PDP Products.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development insocial context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Royeen, C.B. (1986). Thedevelopment of a touch scale for measuring tactile defensiveness in children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40, 414–419.
Royeen, C.G. (1987). TIP-Touch Inventory for Preschoolers:A pilotstudy. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 7(1), 29–40.
Russell, D., Rosenbaum, P., Gowland, G., Hardy, S., Lane, M., Plews, N., McGavin, H., Cadman, D., und Jarvis, S. (1993). Gross motor function measure manual (2nd ed.). Hamilton, Canada: McMaster University.
Schroeder, C.V., Block, M.P., Campbell, E.T., und Stowell, M. (1979). SBC Adult Psychiatric Sensory Integration Evaluation. San Diego, CA: Research Associates, California.
Shurnway-Cook, A., und Woollacott, M. (1995). Motor control: Theory and practical applications. Bai timore: Williams and Wilkins.
Smith, S. (1981, Winter). Speculations on crossing the midline, dyspraxia, and future perspectives: Synopsis of a seminar in the clinic of A. J. Ayres, Ph.D., August 25, 1981. Center for the Study of’Sensory Integrative Dysfunction Quarterly Newsletter, 2–3.
Smith Roley, S. (1999). Course manual:From interpretation to intervention: Course 3 of the Comprehensive Program in Sensory Integration. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Sparrow, S.S., Balla, D.A., und Cicchetti, D.V. (1984). Vineland Adaptive Behavioral Scales. Cirele Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Spitzer, S., Smith Roley, S., Clark, F., und Parham, D. (1997). Sensory integration: Current trends in the United States. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 4:0000-0, 1–16.
Toglia, J. (1992). A dynamic interactional approach to cognitive rehabilitation. In N. Katz (Ed.), Cognitive rehabilitation models for intervention in occupational therapy (pp. 104–143). Boston: An dover Medical Publishers.
University of Buffalo. (1998). Wee-Functional Independence Measure System SM Cinical Guide (Version 5.01). Buffalo NY: Author.
Wilson, B.N., Pollock, N., Kaplan, B.J., und Law, M. (1994). Clinical Observations of Motor and Postural Skills. Tucson, AZ: Therapy Ski 11 Builders.
World Health Organization. (1980). international classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
World Health Organization. (1999). ICIDH-2: International classification of functioning and disability. Beta-2 draft, full version. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
World Health Organization. (2000). ICIDH-2: International classification of disability and health. Prefinal draft. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
Weiterführende Literatur
Anastasi, A., und Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Arendt, R.E., Maclean, W.E., Jr., und Baumeister, A.A. (1988). Critique of sensory integration therapy and its application in mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 92, 401–411.
Clark, F.A., Parham, D., Carlson, M.E., Frank, G. Jackson, J., Pierce, D., Wolfe, R., und Zemke, R. (1991). Occupational science: Academic innovation in the service of occupational therapy’s future. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 300–319.
Coster, W. (1999). School function assessment:Administration and interpretation. Workshop sponsored by Therapro and OTA Wakefield, March 28, Boston University Sargent College, Boston.
Coster, W.J., und Haley, S.M. (1992). Conceptualization and measurement of disablement in infants and young children, infants and Young Children, 4, 11-22.Conceptualization and measurement of disablement in infants and young children, infants and Young Children, 4, 11–22.
Deusen, J. van, und Brunt, D. (1997). Assessment in occupational therapy and physical therapy, Philadelphia: W. B.Saunders.
Dunn, W. (1981). A guide to testing clinical observations. Rockville MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
Greenspan, S.I. (1996). Assessing theemotional and social functioning of infants and young children. In S.J. Meiseis und E. Fenichel (Eds.), New visions for the developmental assessment of infants and young children (pp. 231–266). Washington, DC: Zero to Three.
Greenspan, S.I., und Meisels, S.J. (1996). Toward a new vision for the developmental assessment of infants and young children. In S. J. Meisels und E. Fenichel (Eds.), New visions for the developmental assessment of infants and young children (pp. 11–26). USA: Zero to Three: National Center for Infants, Toddlers, and Families.
Greenspan, S.I., und Wieder, S. (1997). An integrated developmental approach to interventions for young children with severe difficulties in relating and communication. Zero to Three, 17, 5–18.
Haley, S.M. (1994). Perspective: Our measures reflect our practices and beliefs: A perspective on clinical measurement in pediatric physical therapy. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 6, 142–143.
Hertzig, M.E., und Shapiro, T. (1987). The assessment of non focal neurological signs in school-aged children. In D. Tupper (Ed.), Soft neurological signs (pp. 71–93). Orlando, FL: Grune und Stratton.
Hoehn, T.R., und Baumeister, A.A. (1994). A critique of the application of sensory integration therapy to children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 338–350.
Kaplan, B.J., Polatajko, H.J., Wilson, B.N., und Faris, P.D. (1993). Reexamination of sensory integration treatments combination of two efficacy studies. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 342–347.
Landman, G.B., Levine, M.D., Fenton, T., und Soloman, B. (1986). Minor neurological indicators and developmental function in preschool children. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 7, 97–101.
Law, M. (1987). Measurement in occupational therapy: Scientific criteria for evaluation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 133–138.
Lollar, D.J. (1999, May). ICIDH-2presentation. Information presented at the Neurobehavioral Rehabilitation Center Seventh Annual Research. Colloquium: Unifying disability, Boston University Sargent College, Boston.
Meisels, S. J., und Fenichel, E. (Eds.). (1996). New visions for the developmental assessment of infants and young children. Washington, DC: Zero to Three.
Miller, L.J. (Ed.). (1989). Developing norm-referenced standardized tests. Bingham ton, NY: Haworth Press.
National Advisory Board. (1993). Research plan for the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research (NIH Publication No. 93-3509). Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services.
Trombly, C.A. (1993). The issue is: Anticipating the future: Assessment of occupational function. American Journal ofOccupational Therapy, 47, 253–257.
Trombly, C.A. (1995). Elenor Clark Slagle Lectureship. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 960–972.
Tupper, D.E. (Ed.). (1987). Soft neurological signs. Orlando, FL: Grune und Stratton.
Williamson, G.G. (1996). Assessment of adaptive competence. In S.J. Meisels und E. Fenichel (Eds.), New visions for the developmental assessment of infants and young children (pp. 193–206). Washington, DC: Zero to Three.
Yule, W., und Taylor, E. (1987). Classification of clinical soft signs. In D.E. Tupper (Ed.), Soft neurological signs (pp. 19–43), Orlando, FL: Grune und Stratton.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Windsor, MM., Smith Roley, S., Szklut, S. (2004). Beurteilung der Sensorischen Integration und Praxie. In: Sensorische Integration. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18867-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18867-1_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00093-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18867-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive