Advertisement

Persönlichkeitsstörungen und Hirnschädigung: Praktische Überlegungen

  • George P. Prigatano

Zusammenfassung

In der neuropsychologischen Rehabilitation ist die Berücksichtigung der Persönlichkeit des Patienten von entscheidender Bedeutung. Störungen der Persönlichkeit können sowohl für das Rehabilitationsteam (Prigatano et al. 1986) als auch für die Angehörigen (Brooks McKinlay 1983) eine erhebliche Belastung darstellen.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Brooks, D.N., und McKinlay, W. (1983). Personality and behavioural change after severe blunt head injury — a relative’s view. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 46: 336–334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Damasio, A.R., Tranel, D., und Damasio, H. (1991). Somatic markers and the guidance of behavior: Theory and preliminary testing. In H.S. Levin, H.M. Eisenberg, und A.L. Benton (eds), Frontal Lobe Function and Dysfunction. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Freud, S. (1924). A General Introduction to Psychoanalysis (24th edn). Simon and Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Gainotti, G. (1993). Emotional and psychosocial problems after brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 3(3): 259–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goldstein, H. (1951/1971). On emotions: Considerations from the organismic point of view. J. Psychology 31: 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Reprinted in A. Gurwitsch, E. M. Goldstein Haudek, und W.E. Haudek (eds), Kurt Goldstein Selected Papers. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.Google Scholar
  7. Goldstein, K. (1952). The effect of bra in damage on the personality. Psychiatry 15:245–260.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Heilman, K.M., und Valenstein, E. (1993). Clinical Neuropsychology (3rd edn). Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Jung, C.G. (1964). Man and His Symbols. Doubleday Windfall, Garden City, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Luria, A. R. (1966). Higher Cerebral Functions in Man. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  11. MacLean, P.D. (1973). A triune concept of the brain and behavior. Lecture I. Man’s reptilian and limbic inheritance; Lecture II. Man’s limbic brain and the psychoses; Lecture III. New trends in man’s evolution. In T. Boag und D. Campbell (eds), The Hindu Memorial Lectures (pp. 6-66). University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
  12. MacLean, P.D. (1990). The Triune Brain in Evolution. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Manseau, C. (1995). Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Long Term Effects on Sleep, Sleepiness and Performance. Doctoral Dissertation, Carleton University, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  14. Nelson, L., Satz, P., und D’Elia, L. (1994). The Neuropsychology Behavior and Affect Profile Manual. Mind Garden Press, Palo Alto, Calif.Google Scholar
  15. Pribram, K.H. (1971). Languages of the Brain:Experimental Paradoxes and Principles in Neurospsychology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  16. Prigatano, G. P.(1987) Psychiatric aspects of head injury: problem areas and suggested guidelines for research. In H. Levin, J. Graffinan, und H.M. Eisenberg (eds), Neurobehavioural Recovery from Head Injury (pp. 215-231). Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Prigatano, G. P. (1991). Disordered mind, wounded soul: the emerging role of psychotherapy in rehabilitation after bra in injury. Journal of HeadTrauma Rehabilitation 6:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Prigatano, G. P. (1992). Personality disturbances associated with traumatic brain injury. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 60:360–368.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Prigatano, G. P. (1995). 1994 Sheldon Berrol, MD, Senior Lectureship: the problem of lost normality after brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 10(3):87–95.Google Scholar
  20. Prigatano, G. P. (1996). Neuropsychological testing after traumatic brain injury. In R.W. Evans (ed), Neurology and Trauma (pp.222-230). W.B.Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  21. Prigatano, G. P., Altman, I.M., und O’Brien, K. P. (1990). Behavioral limitations that brain injured patients tend to underestimate. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 4: 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Prigatano, G. P., und Ben-Yishay, Y. (1999). Psychotherapy and psychotherapeutic interventions in brain injury rehabilitation. In M. Rosenthal (ed), Rehabilitat ion of the Adult and Child with Traumatic Brain Injury (3rd edn). F.A. Davis, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  23. Prigatano, G. P., und Henderson, S. (1997). Cognitive outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. In J.B. Bederson (ed), Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Pathophysiology and Management (pp. 27-40). American Association of Neurological Surgeons, ParkRidge, III.Google Scholar
  24. Prigatano, G. P., Stahl, M., Orr, W., und Zeiner H. (1982). Sleep and dreaming disturbances in closed head injury patients. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 45:78–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Prigatano, G. P., und Weinstein, E. A. (1996). Edwin A. Weinstein’s contributions to neuropsychological rehabilitation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 6(4):305–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Prigatano, G. P., et al. (1986). Neuropsychological Rehabilitation After Brain Injury. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  27. Schafer, R. (1967). Projective Testing and Psychoanalysis. International Universities, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Simon, H. A. (1967). Motivational and emotional controls of cognition. Psychol. Rev. 76:29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Weinstein, E.A., und Kahn, R.L. (1955). Denial of Illness: Symbolic and Physiological Aspects. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, III.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • George P. Prigatano
    • 1
  1. 1.Barrow Neurological InstituteSt. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical CenterPhoenixUSA

Personalised recommendations