Advertisement

Das Erleben der Patienten und die Natur höherer Hirnfunktionen

  • George P. Prigatano

Zusammenfassung

Am Beginn der neuropsychologischen Rehabilitation steht das subjektive Erleben der Patienten. Dieses subjektive Erleben muss bei der neuropsychologischen Untersuchung und bei der Planung rehabilitativer Maßnahmen berücksichtigt werden. Erlebt der Patient die neuropsychologische Untersuchung oder das Rehabilitationsprogramm nicht zumindest zu einem gewissen Grad als hilfreich, dann wird er zu einer Mitarbeit nicht bereit sein oder nur passiv an den Therapien teilnehmen. Deshalb betont das erste Prinzip der neuropsychologischen Rehabilitation die Notwendigkeit, das phänomenoloqische Feld bzw. das subjektive Erleben des Patienten zu verstehen. Das Erleben des Patienten ist häufig durch Verwirrung und Frustration gekennzeichnet. Schaffen wires, unsere Therapie darauf auszurichten, diese Frustration und Verwirrung zu reduzieren, dann wird der Patient — unabhängig davon, ob die rehabilitativen Maßnahmen tatsächlich seine höheren Hirnfunktionen verbessern oder nicht — motiviert mitarbeiten.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Amsel, A. (1958). The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontin uous reward situations. Psychol. Bull. 55:102–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett, B. E., Bryant, B. K., VandenBos, G.R., und Greenwood, A. (1990). Professional Liability and Risk Management. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benson, D.E. (1993). Aphasia. In K.M. Heilman und E. Valenstein (eds), Clinical Neuropsychology (3rd ed, pp. 17–36). Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Ben-Yishay, Y., und Prigatano, G. P.(1990). Cognitive remediation. In E. Griffith, M. Rosenthal, M. R. Bond, und J.D. Miller (eds), Rehabilitation of the Adult and Child with Traumatic Brain Injury (pp.393–4(9). E.A. Davis, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  5. Brodal, A. (1973). Self-observations and neuro-anatomical considerations after a stroke. Brain 96:675–694.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chapman, L. E., und Wolff, H.G.(1959). The cerebral hemispheres and the highest integrative functions of man. Arch.Neurol. 1, 357–424.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dollard, J., und Miller, N. E.(1950). Personality and Psychotherapy. Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Franzen, E.A., und Myers, R.E.(1973). Neural control of social behavior: Prefrontal and anterior temporal cortex. Neuropsychologia 11:141–157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Freud, S.(1924). A General Introduction to Psychoanalysis (24th ed). Simon and Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Gans, J. S. (1983). Hate in the rehabilitation setting. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 64:176–179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Goldstein, K. (1952). The effect of bra in damage on the personality. Psychiatry 15, 245–260.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Jung, C. G. (1964). Man and His Symbols. Doubleday Windfall, Garden City, NY.Google Scholar
  13. Kalff, D.M.(1980). Sandplay. Sigo Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  14. Kihlstrom, J.E (1987). The cognitive unconscious. Science 237:1445–1452.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. LaBaw, W. L. (1969). Denial inside out: Subjective experience with anosognosia in closed head injury. Psychiatry 32(1):174–191.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lawsen, R.(1965). Frustration: The Development of a Scientific Concept. Macmillan, NewYork.Google Scholar
  17. Levin, H.S., Benton, A.L., und Grossman, R.G. (1982). Neurobehavioral Consequences of Closed Head Injury. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Levin, H. S., Gary, H. E., Eisenberg, H. M., Ruff, R. M., Barth, J. T., Kreutzer, J., High, W.M., Portman, S., Foulkes, M.A., Jane, J.A., Marmarou, A., und Marshall, L. F. (1990). Neurobehavioral outcome 1 year after severe head injury:experience of the Traumatic Coma Data Bank. J. Neurosurg. 73:699–709.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Luria, A. R. (1966). Higher Cerebral Functions in Man. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Mandler, G.(1984). Mind and Body. Psychology of Emotion and Stress. W.W.Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Mesulam, M-M. (1990). Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing of attention, language, and memory. Ann. Neurol. 28(5):597–613.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller, GA, Galanter, E.G., und Pribram K.H.(1960). Plans and the Structure of Behavior. Rinehart and Weinstein, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Posner, M. I. (1990). Foundations of Cognitive Science. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  24. Pribram, K.H.(1971). Languages of the Brain:Experimental Paradoxes and Principles in Neuropsychology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  25. Prigatano, G. P. (1989). Bring it up in milieu: toward effective traumat ic brain injury rehabilitation interaction. Rehabilitation Psychology 34(2):135–144.Google Scholar
  26. Prigatano, G. P.(1991a). The relationship of frontal lobe damage to diminished awareness: Studies in rehabilitation. In H.S. Levin, H.M. Eisenberg, und A.L. Benton (eds), Frontal lobe Function and Dysfunction (pp.381–397). Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Prigatano, G. P. (1991b). Disordered mind, wounded soul: the emerging role of psychotherapy in rehabilitation after brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 6(4): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Prigatano, G. P.(1992). Personality disturbances associated with traumatic brain injury. J.Consult. Clin. Psychol. 60(3):360–368.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Prigatano, G. P. (1995). 1994 Sheldon Berrol, MD, Senior Lectureship: The problem of lost normality after brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 10(3):87–95.Google Scholar
  30. Prigatano, G.P., Fordyce, D.J., Zeiner, H.K. Roueche, J.R., Pepping, M., und Wood, B.C.(1986). Neuropsychological Rehabilitation After Brain Injury. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  31. Prigatano, G.P., und Henderson, S. (1997). Cognitive outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. In J. B. Bederson (ed), Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Pathophysiology and Management (pp. 27–40). American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Park Ridge, III.Google Scholar
  32. Prigatano, G.P., und Schacter, D.L.(1991). Awareness of Deficit After Brain Injury:Clinical and Theoretical Issues. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Prigatano, G.P., und Weinstein, E.A. (1996). Edwin A. Weinstein’s contributions to neuropsychological rehabilitation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 6(4):305–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rogers, C.R. (1951). Client-Centered Therapy: Its Current Practice, Implications, and Theory. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar
  35. Roland, P.E. (1993). Brain Activation. Wiley-Liss, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Russell, W. R.(1971). The Traumatic Amnesias. Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
  37. Satz, P.(1966). Specific and nonspecific effects of bra in lesions in man. J.Abnorm. Psychol. 71:56–70.Google Scholar
  38. Schafer, R. (1967). ProjectiveTesting and Psychoanalysis. International Universities, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Sperry, R.(1974). Lateral specialization in the surgically separated hemispheres.In E.O. Schmitt und E.G. Worden (eds), The Neurosciences (pp. 5–19). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  40. Stuss, D.T., und Benson, D. E (1986). The Frontal lobes. Raven, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Wise, R. J., Hadar,, Howard, D., und Patterson, K. (1991). Language activation studies with positron emission tomography. Exploring Brain Functional Anatomy with Positron Tomography (pp. 218–228). John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • George P. Prigatano
    • 1
  1. 1.Barrow Neurological InstituteSt. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical CenterPhoenixUSA

Personalised recommendations