Advertisement

Funktionsverbesserung und -verschlechterung nach Hirnschädigungen

  • George P. Prigatano
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Bei einer Vielzahl neuropathologischer Läsionen und Erkrankungen zeigen langfristig e Verlaufsuntersuchungen kontinuierliche, dynamische Veränderungen bei hirngeschädigten Patienten. Eine Funktionsrestitution ist selten vollständig, dennoch ist das Gehirn ein dynamisches Organ, das einer kontinuierlichen Veränderung sowohl zum Besseren als auch zum Schlechteren unterliegt. Deshalb ist die Beobachtung von Geschwind (1985) so wichtig.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Aizawa, H., Inase, M., Mushiake, H., Shima, K., und Tanji, J. (1991). Reorganization of activity in the supplementary motor area associated with motor learning and functional recovery. Exp. Brain Res. 84:668–671.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, G.E., Furey, M. L., Grady, C.L. et al. (1997). Association of premorbid intellectual function with cerebral metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease: implications for the cognitive reserve hypothesis. Am. J. Psychiatry 154: 165–172.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Basso, A., Gardelli, M., Grassi, M. P., und Mariotti, M. (1989). The role of the right hemisphere in recovery from aphasia: two case studies. Cortex 25: 555–566.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bawden, H.N., Knights, R.M., und Winogron, H.W. (1985). Speeded performance following head injury in children. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 7(1): 39–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ben-Yishay, Y., Rattok, J., Lakin, P. et al. (1985). Neuropsychological rehabilitation: quest for a holistic approach. Semin. Neurol. 5: 252–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bisiach, E., und Vallar, G. (1988). Hemineglect in humans. In F. Boller und J. Grafman (eds), Handbook of Neuropsychology (Vol. 1,pp. 195-222). Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  7. Boecker, H., Kleinschmidt, A., Requardt, M., Hanicke, W., Merboldt, K.D., und Frahm, J. (1994). Functional cooperativity of human cortical motor areas during self-paced simple finger movements: a high-resolution MRI study. Brain 117:1231–1239.Google Scholar
  8. Bond, M. R. (1975). Assessment of psychosocial outcome after severe head injury. Ciba Foundation Symposium 34 (new series).Outcome of Severe Damage to the Central Nervous System (pp. 141-158). Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  9. Chollet, F., DiPiero, V., Wise, R.J. S., Brooks, D.J., Dolan, R.J., und Frackowiak, R.S.J. (1991). The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: a study with positron emission tomography. Ann. Neurol. 29:63–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corkin, S., Rosen, T.J., Sullivan, E.V., und Clegg, R.A. (1989). Penetrating head injury in young adulthood exacerbates cognitive decline in later years. J. Neurosci 9(11):3876–3883.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dikmen, S. S., Machamer, J. E., Winn, H. R., und Temkin, N. R. (1995). Neuropsychological outcome at 1-year post head injury. Neuropsychology 9(1):80–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Forrester, G., und Geffen, G. (1991). Performance measures of 7-to 15-year old children on the Auditory Verbal Learning Test. Clinical Neuropsychologist 5(4):345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gazzaniga, M. S. (1978). Is seeing believing: notes on clinical recovery. In S. Finger (ed), Recovery from Brain Damage. Research and Theory (pp.410-414). Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Geffen, G., Moar, K.J., O’Hanlon, A.P., Clark, C.R., und Geffen, L.B. (1990). Performance measures of 16-to 86-year-old males and females on the Aud bv itory Verbal Learning Test. Clinical Psychologist 4(1):45–63.Google Scholar
  15. Geschwind, N. (1985). Mechanisms of change after brain lesions. In F. Nottebohm (ed), Hope for a New Neurology (pp. 4-11). New York Academy of Sciences, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Goetz, C.G., und Pappert, E.J. (1996). Movement disorders:post-traumatic syndromes. In R.W. Evans (ed), Neurology and Trauma (pp.569-580). W. B.Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  17. Goldman, P.S. (1974). An alternative to developmental plasticity: heterology of CNS structures in infants and adults. In D. G. Stein, J.J. Rosen, und N. Butters (eds), Plasticity and Recovery of Function in the Central Nervous System (pp. 149-174). Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Goldman-Rakic, P. S., Isseroff, A., Schwartz, M. L., und Bugbee, N. M. (1983). The neurobiology of cognitive development. In P.H. Mussen (ed), Handbook of Child Psychology: Biology and Infancy Development (pp. 311-344). Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Grafman, J., Salazar, A., Weingartner, H., Vance, S., und Amin, D. (1986). The relationship of brain-tissue loss volume and lesion location to cognitive deficit. J. Neurosci. 6(2):301–307.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Haaland, K.Y., Temkin, N., Randahl, G., und Dikmen, S. (1994). Recovery of simple motor skills after head injury. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 16(3):448–456.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hier, D.B., Mondlock, J., und Caplan, L.R. (1983). Recovery of behavioral abnormalities after right hemisphere stroke. Neurology 33:345–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jackson, J. H. (1888). Remarks on the diagnosis and treatment of diseases of the brain. British Medical Journal July 21: 111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jennett, B., und Teasdale, G. (1981). Management of Head Injuries. F. A. Davis, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  24. Johnson, S. C., Bigler, E. D., Burr, R. B., und Blatter, D. D. (1994). White matter atrophy, ventricular dilation, and intellectual functioning following traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology 8(3): 307–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kawashima, R., Yamada, K., Kinomura, S. et al. (1993). Regional cerebral blood flow changes of cortical motor areas and prefrontal areas in humans related to ipsilateral and contralateral hand movement. Brain Res. 623:33–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kertesz, A. (1988). Recovery of language disorders: homologous contralateral or connected ipsilateral compensation? In S. Finger, T. E. Levere, C. R. Almi, und D. G. Stein (eds), Brain Injury and Recovery. Theoretical and Controversial Issues (pp. 307-322). Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Kertesz, A. (1993). Recovery and treatment. In K.M. Heilman und E. Valenstein (eds), Clinical Neuropsychology (3rd edn, pp. 647-674). Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Kime, S. K., Lamb, D.G., und Wilson, B.A. (1996). Use of a comprehensive program of external cuing to enhance procedural memory in a patient with dense amnesia. Brain Inj. 10(1):17–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Klonoff, P. S., Costa, L. D., und Snow, W. G. (1986). Predictors and indicators of quality of life in patients with closed-head injury. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 8(5):469–485.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Klonoff, P. S., Lamb, D. G., Henderson, S. W., und Shepherd, J. (1999). New considerations for assessing outcome after milieu-oriented rehabilitation. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.Google Scholar
  31. Knopman, D. S., Seines, O. A., Niccum, N., Rubens, A. B., Yock. D., und Larson, D. (1983). A longitudinal study of speech fluency in aphasia: a correlates of recovery and persistent nonfluency. Neurology 33: 1170–1178.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kolb, B. (1990). Recovery from occipital stroke:a self-report and an inquiry into visual processes. Canadian Journal of Psychology 44: 130–147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kolb, B. (1995). Brain Plasticity and Behavior. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
  34. Laurence, S., und Stein, D.G. (1978). Recovery after brain damage and the concept of localization of function. In S. Finger, T.E. Levere, C. R. Almi, und D.G. Stein (eds), Recovery from Brain Damage. Research and Theory (pp. 369-407). Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Lezak, M.D. (1979). Recovery of memory and learning functions following traumatic brain injury. Cortex 15:63–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lezak, M.D. (1995). Neuropsychological Assessment (3rd edn) Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Luria, A. R. (1966). Higher Cerebral Functions in Man. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Luria, A. R., Naydin, V. L., Tsvetkova, L. S., und Vinarskaya, E. N. (1969). Restoration of higher cortical function following local brain damage. In P. J. Vinken und G. W. Bruyn (eds), Handbook of Clinical Neurology (Vol. 3, pp. 368-433). North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  39. Lynch, C, and Olmstead, E. (1998). South-Western Mathmatters. An Integrated Approach. South-Western Educational, Cincinnati.Google Scholar
  40. Mesulam, M-M. (1990). Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing of attention, language, and memory. Ann. Neurol. 28(5):597–613.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Naeser, M. A., Caddie, A., Palumbo, C. L., und Stiassny-Eder, D. (1990). Late recovery of auditory comprehension in global aphasia. Improved recovery observed with subcortical temporal isthmus lesion vs Wernicke’s cortical area lesion. Arch. Neurol. 47:425–432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Perani, D., Vallar, G., Paulesu, E., Alberoni, M., und Fazio, F. (1993). Left and right hemisphere contribution to recovery from neglect after right hemisphere damage — an [18F] FDGPET study of two cases. Neuropsychologia 31(2): 115–125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Prigatano, G. P. (1999). Motivation and awareness in cognitive rehabilitation. In D. Stuss und I. H. R. Robertson (eds). Cognitive Rehabilitation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  44. Prigatano, G. P., und Hoffmann, B. (1997). Finger tapping and brain dysfunction:a qualitative and quantitative study. BNI Quarterly 13(4): 14–18.Google Scholar
  45. Prigatano, G. P., Fordyce, D. J., Zeiner, H. K., Roueche, J. R., Pepping, M., und Wood, B. C. (1986). Neuropsychological Rehabilitation After Brain Injury: Theoretical and Clinical Issues. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  46. Prigatano, G. P., und Parsons, O. A. (1976). Relationship of age and education to Halstead test performance in different patient populations. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 44: 527–533.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Prigatano, G. P., und Wong, J. L. (1997). Speed of finger tapping and goal attainment after unilateral cerebral vascular accident. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 78:847–852.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Prigatano, G. P., und Wong, J. L. (1999). Cognitive and affective improvement in brain dysfunctional patients who achieve inpatient rehabilitation goals. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.Google Scholar
  49. Prigatano, G. P., Wong, J. L., Williams, C., und Plenge, K. L. (1997). Prescribed versus actual length of stay and inpatient neurorehabilitation outcome for brain dysfunctional patients. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 78:621–629.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rasmussen, P., und Milner, B. (1977). The role of early left-brain injury in determining lateralization of cerebral speech functions. In S.J. Dimond und D.A. Blizard (eds), Conference on Evolution and Lateralization of the Brain. New York Academy of Sciences, New York.Google Scholar
  51. Rattok, J., Ben-Yishay, Y., Ezrachi, O. et al. (1992). Outcome of different treatment mixes in a multidimensional neuropsychological rehabilitation program. Neuropsychology 6(4):395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reitan, R. M., und Wolfson, D. (1994). Dissociation of motor impairment and higher-level brain deficits in strokes and cerebral neoplasms. Clinical Neuropsychologist 8(2): 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Roland, P. E. (1993). Brain Activation. Wiley-Liss, New York.Google Scholar
  54. Roland, P. E., und Seitz, R. J. (1991). Positron emission tomography studies of the somatosensory system in man. Ciba Foundation Symposium 163. Exploring Brain Functional Anatomy with Positron Tomography (pp. 113-124). John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England.Google Scholar
  55. Roses, A. D., und Saunders, A. M. (1997). ApoE, Alzheimer’s disease, and recovery from brain stress. Ann. N.Y.Acad. Sci. 826:200–212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sabatini,, Toni, D., Pantano, P. et al. (1994). Motor recovery after early brain damage: a case of brain spasticity. Stroke 25: 514–517.Google Scholar
  57. Seidman, L. J., Biederman, J., Faraone, S. V., Weber, W., und Ouellette, C (1997). Toward defining a neuropsychology of attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder: performance of children and adolescents from a large clinically referred sample. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 65(1): 150–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shimoyama, I., Ninchoji, T., und Uemura, K. (1990). The finger-tapping test: a quantitative analysis. Arch. Neurol. 47(6):681–684.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Smith, A. (1964). Changing effects of frontal lesions in man. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 27: 511–515.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stein, D.G. (1996). Recovery of function. In J.G. Beaumont, P.M. Kenealy, und M.J.C. Rogers (eds), The Blackwell Dictionary of Neuropsychology (pp. 608-613). Blackwell, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  61. Stein, O.G. (1999). Brain injury and theories of recovery. In Goldstein, L. (ed), Advances in Pharmacotherapy in Recovery after Stroke. Futura, Armonk, NY.Google Scholar
  62. Thomsen, I.V. (1984). Late outcome of very severe blunt head trauma: a 10-1 Syear second follow-up. J. Neurol. Neurasurg. Psychiatry 47:260–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vega, A., Jr, und Parsons, O. A. (1967). Cross-validation of the Halstead-Reitan tests for bra in damage. Journal of Consulting Psychology 31:619–623.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Walker, A. E., und Erculei, E. (1969). Head Injured Man: Fifteen Yearslater. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL.Google Scholar
  65. Ween, J. E., Alexander, M. P., D’Esposito, M., und Roberts, M. (1996). Factors predictive of stroke outcome in a rehabilitation setting. Neurology 47:388–392.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Weiller, C, Chollet, E, Friston, K.J., Wise, R. J. S., und Frackowiak, R.S.J. (1992). Functional reorganization of the brain in recovery from striatocapsular infarction in man. Ann. Neurol. 31:463–472.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Weiller, C, Ramsay, S.C, Wise, R.J.S., Friston, K.J., und Frackowiak, R.S.J. (1993). Individual patterns of functional reorganization in the human cerebral cortex after capsular infarction. Ann. Neurol. 33: 181–189.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wilson, B.A., und Baddeley, A. (1993). Spontaneous recovery of impaired memory span: does comprehension recover? Cortex 29:153–159.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Wolf, S.L., Lecraw, D.E., Barton, L.A., und Jann, B.B. (1989). Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp. Neurol. 104:125–132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yakovlev, P.I. (1953). Fronta-pontine bundle and associated projection fibers of the frontal lobe following frontalleucotomy. Transactions of the American Neurolog ical Association 78:286–291.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • George P. Prigatano
    • 1
  1. 1.Barrow Neurological InstituteSt. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical CenterPhoenixUSA

Personalised recommendations