Advertisement

Zusammenarbeit in interdisziplinären Rehabilitationsteams

  • George P. Prigatano

Zusammenfassung

8. Prinzip: Der Umgang mit Hirngeschädigten löst im familiären Umfeld und im Rehabilitationsteam bestimmte emotionale Reaktionen aus. Das angemessene Management dieser Reaktionen ist von entscheidender Bedeutung für den Rehabilitations-und Adaptationsprozess.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Ben-Yishay, Y., und Prigatano, G. P. (1990). Cognitive remediation. In E. Griffith, M. Rosenthal, M. R. Bond, und J. D. Miller (eds), Rehabilitation of the Adult and Child with Traumatic Brain Injury (pp.393-409). F. W. Davis, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  2. Chamberlain, K., und Zika, S. (1990). The minor events approach to stress: support for the use of daily hassles. Br. J. Psychol. 81:469–481.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fordyce, W.E. (1981). ACRM Presidential Address on Interdisciplinary Peers. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 62:S1–S3.Google Scholar
  4. Franzen, E.A., und Meyers, R. E. (1973). Neural control of social behavior: prefrontal and anterior temporal cortex. Neuropsychologia 11: 141–157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gabbard, G. O. (1990). The therapeutic relationship in psychiatric hospital treatment. Bull. Menninger Clin. 56(1):4–19.Google Scholar
  6. Gans, J. S. (1983). Hate in the rehabilitation setting. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 64: 176–179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Haney, C, Banks, C, und Zimbardo, P. (1973). Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. International Journal of Criminology and Penology 1:69–97.Google Scholar
  8. Holmes, T., und Rahe, R. (1967). The social readjustment rating scale. J. Psychosomatic Research 11:213–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Isaac, G., und Leakey, R. E. F. (1979). Introduction. In G. Isaac und R. E. F. Leakey (eds), (pp. 2-8) Readings from Scientific American, Human Ancestors. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  10. Macciocchi, S.N., und Eaton B.(1995). Decision and attribution bias in neurorehabilitation. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 76:521–524.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Maslach, C (1982). Burnout-The Cost of Caring. Prentice Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Myers, I. B., und McCaulley, M. H. (1989). Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychologist, Palo Alto, Calif.Google Scholar
  13. Prigatano, G. P. (1989). Bring it up in milieu: toward effective traumatic brain injury rehabilitation interaction. Rehabilitation Psychology 34(2): 135–144.Google Scholar
  14. Prigatano, G. P. (1992). What does the brain injured person experience? Implications for rehabilitation. Centennial Lecture in Brain Injury Rehabilitation, American Psychological Association Convention, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  15. Prigatano, G. P., Fordyce, D.J., Zeiner, H. K., Roueche, J. R., Pepping, M., und Wood, B. (1984). Neuropsychological rehabilitation after closed head injury in young adults. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 47:505–513.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Prigatano, G. P., Klonoff, P.S., O’Brien, K. P. et al. (1994). Productivity after neuropsychologically oriented, milieu rehabilitation. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 9(1): 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Prigatano, G. P., und Schacter, D. L.(1991). Awareness of Deficit after Brain Injury: Theoretical and Clinical Issues. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Prigatano, G. P., Wong, J.L., Williams, C. und Plenge, K. (1997). Prescribed versus actual length of stay and inpatient neurorehabilitation outcome for brain dysfunctional patients. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 78:621–629.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Prigatano, G. P., et al. (1986). Neuropsychological Rehabilitation After Brain Injury. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  20. Washburn, S.(1960). Tools and human evolution. In G. Isaac und R. E. F. Leakey (eds), Readings from Scientific American. Human Ancestors (pp. 1-21). W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  21. Zika, S., und Chamberlain, K. (1987). Relation of hassles and personality to subjective well-being. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 53(1): 55–162.Google Scholar
  22. Zika, S., und Chamberlain, K. (1992). On the relation between meaning in life and psychological well-being. Br. J. Psychol. 83: 133–145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zimbardo, P. G., Haney, C., Banks, W.C, und Jaffe, D. (1973). The mind is a formidable jailer: a Pirandellian prison. New York Times Magazine April 8:38–60.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • George P. Prigatano
    • 1
  1. 1.Barrow Neurological InstituteSt. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical CenterPhoenixUSA

Personalised recommendations