Advertisement

Einführung: Prinzipien und historischer Rückblick

  • George P. Prigatano

Zusammenfassung

In den USA und in Europa erhält das Gesundheitssystem immer weniger finanzielle Förderung. Unter anderem reduzieren sich auch rehabilitative Leistungen für Menschen mit erworbener Hirnschädigung. Verschärft wird dieses Problem dadurch, dass bisher keine ausreichenden Wirksamkeitsnachweise für spezifische Rehabilitations-maßnahmen erbracht wurden. Oft fehlen wissenschaftlichen Belege zur Verhinderung politischer Entscheidungen, die sich ausschließlich an ökonomischen Erwägungen und weniger an den Bedürfnissen der Patienten orientieren (Prigatano 1996).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Ben-Yishay, Y., und Diller, L. (1983). Cognitive remediation. In M. Rosenthal (ed), Rehabilitation of the Head Injured Adult. F.A. Davis, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  2. Ben-Yishay, Y., Diller, L., Gerstman, L., und Gordon, W.(1970). Relationship between initial competence and ability to profit from cues in braindamaged individuals. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 75:248–259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boake, C. (1991). The history of cognitive rehabilitation following head injury. In J. S. Kreutzer und P. H. Wehman (eds), Cognitive Rehabilitation for Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Functional Approach (pp. 3-12). Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  4. Bronowski, J.(1973). The Ascent of Man. Little, Brown, Boston.Google Scholar
  5. Christensen, A. L., Pinner, E.M., Moller Pedersen, P. Teasdale, T.W., und Trexler, L.E.(1992). Psychosocial outcome following in dividualized neuropsychological rehabilitation of brain damage. Acta Neurol. Scand. 85:32–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diller, L. (1992). Introduction to the special section on neuropsychology and rehabilitation — the view from New York University. Neuropsychology 6(4):357–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diller, L., und Gordon, W. A. (1981). Interventions for cognitive deficits in brain-injured adults. J. Consult. Clin, Psychol. 49:822–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diller, L., und Weinberg, J. (1972). Differential aspects of attention in brain damaged persons. Percept. Mot.Skills 35:71–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Edelman, G. M. (1987). Neural Darwinism: The Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Franz, S. I. (1916). The re-education of an aphasic. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1:355–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Franz, S. I. (1924). Studies in re-education: The aphasias. Comparative Psychology 4(4):349–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Franz, S.I., und Lashley, K.S.(1917). The retention of habits by the rat after destruction of the frontal portion of the cerebrum. Psychobiology 1:3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freud, S.(1924). A General Introduction to Psychoanalysis, (24th ed). Simon and Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Goldstein, K. (1942). Aftereffects of Brain Injury in War. Grune and Stratton, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Goldstein, K. (1952). The effect of brain damage on the personality. Psychiatry 15:245–260.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hall, C.S., und Lindzey, G.(1978). Theories of Personality (3rd ed). John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Hebb, D. (1974). What psychology is about. Am. Psychol. 29:71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hebb, D. O. (1949). The Organization of Behavior. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Jackson, J.H.(1888). Remarks on the diagnosis and treatment of diseases of the brain. British Medical Journal July 21:111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jackson, J.H. (1898). Relations of different divisions of the central nervous system to one another and to parts of the body. Lancet 1:79–87.Google Scholar
  21. Jacobs, H. (1992). Behavioral Analysis Guidelines and Brain Rehabilitation: People, Principles and Programs. Aspen Publishers, Gaithersburg, MD.Google Scholar
  22. Jung, C. G. (1912/1952). Collected Works (Vol. 5, Symbols of Transformation). Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  23. Kihlstrom, J. F.(1987). The cognitive unconscious. Science 237, 1445–1452.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lashley, K.S.(1929/1964). Brain Mechanisms and Intelligence:A Quantitative Study of Injuries to the Brain. Hafner, New York. Originally published (1929) by University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lashley, K. S. (1938). Factors limiting recovery after central nervous lesions. J.Nerv.Ment. Dis. 88(6):733–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lashley, K. S., und Franz, S.I.(1917). The effects of cerebral destruction upon habit formation and retention in the albino rat. Psychobiology 1, 71–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Luria, A.R.(1948/1963). Restoration of Function After Brain Trauma (in Russian). Moscow: Academy of Medical Science (Pergamon. London, 1963).Google Scholar
  28. Luria, A. R. (1966). Kurt Goldstein and neuropsychology. Neuropsychologia 4:311–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Luria, A. R., Naydin, V. L., Tsvetkova, L. S., und Vinarskaya, E. N. (1969). Restoration of higher cortical function following local brain damage. In P. J. Vinken und G.W. Bruyn (eds), Handbook of Clinical Neurology (Vol. 3, pp. 368–433). North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  30. Malmo, R. B. (1959). Activation: A neuropsychological dimension. Psychol.Rev. 66:367–386.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pöppel, E., und v. Steinbüchel, N. (1992). Neuropsychological rehabilitation. In N. v. Steinbuchel, D.Y. von Cramon, und E. Poppel (eds), Neuropsychological Rehabilitation (pp. 3–19). Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pribram, K.H.(1971). Languages of the Brain:Experimental Paradoxes and Principles in Neuropsychology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  33. Pribram, K.H.(1987). Subdivisions of the frontal cortex revisited. In E. Brown und E. Perecman (eds), The Frontal Lobes Revisited (pp. 11–39). IRBN Press, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Pribram, K. H., (1991). Brain and Perception: Holonomy and Structure in Figural Processing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale,NJ.Google Scholar
  35. Pribram, K. H. und Gill, M. M. (1976). Freud’s „Project“ Reassessed. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Pribram, K.H., und Luria, A. R.(1973). Psychophysiology of the Frontal Lobes. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Pribram, K.H., und McGuinness, D. (1975). Arousal, activation and effort in the control of attention. Psychol. Rev. 82(2):116–149.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pribram, K.H., Mishkin, M., Rosvold, H. E., und Kaplan, S.J.(1952). Effects medial frontal cortex of baboons. Journal of comparative Physiology and Psychology 45:565–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Prigatano, G.P.(1991). Science and symbolism in neuropsychological rehabilitation after brain injury. The Tenth Annual James C. Hemphill Lecture. Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
  40. Prigatano, G.P. (1996). Neuropsychological rehabilitation after brain injury: scientific and professional issues. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings 3(1): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Prigatano, G.P., Fordyce, D.J., Zeiner, H.K., Roueche, J.R., Pepping, M., und Wood, B.C.(1986). Neuropsychological Rehabilitation after Brain Injury. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  42. Prigatano, G. P., und Schacter, D. L. (1991). Awareness of Deficit After Brain Injury: Clinical and Theoretical Issues. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  43. Prigatano, G. P., und Weinstein, E.A. (1996). Edwin A. Weinstein’s contributions to neuropsychological rehabilitation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 6(4):305–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rattok, J., Ben-Yishay, D., Lakin, P., Piasetsky, E., Ross, B., Silver, S., Vakil, E., Zide, E., und Diller, L. (1992). Outcome of different treatment mixes in a multidimensional neuropsychological rehabilitation program. Neuropsychology 6(4):3395–3415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rogers, C. R.(1961). On Becoming a Person. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar
  46. Simon, H.A. (1967). Motivation and emotional controls of cognition. Psychol. Rev. 74:29–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Skinner, B.F. (1938). The Behavior of Organisms. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.Google Scholar
  48. Sperry, R.W. (1974). Lateral specialization in the surgically separated hemispheres. In F.O. Schmitt und F.G. Worden (eds), The Neurosciences (pp. 5–19). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  49. Stuss, D.T. (1995). Measurements of frontallobe dysfunction for the clinician. Conference on Neuropsychological Assessment and Rehabilitation after Brain Injury: Empirical and Theoretical Foundations, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Ariz., May 1995.Google Scholar
  50. Webster’s New Universal Unabridged Dictionary (1983). New World Dictionaries/Simon & Schuster, Cleveland.Google Scholar
  51. Weinstein, E. A., und Kahn, R.L. (1952). Nonaphasic misnaming (paraphasia) in organic brain disease. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry 67, 72–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weinstein, E.A., und Kahn, R.L. (1955). Denial of Illness: Symbolic and Physiological Aspects. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, III.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weinstein, E. A., Lyerly, O. G., Cole, M., und Ozer, M. N. (1966). Meaning in jargon aphasia. Cortex 2:165–187.Google Scholar
  54. Weinstein, E. A., Marvin, S. K., und Keller, N.J.A. (1962). Amnesia asa language pattern. Arch.Gen.Psychiatry 6:17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wood, R. L. (1987). Brain Injury Rehabilitation: A Neurobehavioural Approach. Croom-Helm, London.Google Scholar
  56. Zangwill, O. L. (1947). Psychological aspects of rehabilitation in cases of brain injury. Br. J. Psychol. 37:60–69.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • George P. Prigatano
    • 1
  1. 1.Barrow Neurological InstituteSt. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical CenterPhoenixUSA

Personalised recommendations