Zusammenfassung
Instruktionsdesign (Instructional Design, ID) hat sich seit den späten fünfziger Jahren in Nordamerika und später in den übrigen englischsprachigen Ländern, aber auch in den Niederlanden, Belgien und Finnland als wissenschaftlich-technologische Teildisziplin der pädagogischen Psychologie bzw. der empirischen Erziehungswissenschaft entwickelt. Die Grundidee war stets die systematische und vor allem die differenzierte Anwendung pädagogisch-psychologischer Prinzipien bei der Konzeption von Lerngelegenheiten bzw. Lernumgebungen.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Al-Diban, S. & Seel, N. (1999). Evaluation als Forschungsaufgabe von Instruktionsdesign. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 27(1), S. 29–60.
Alisch, L.-M. (1995). Grundlagenanalyse der Pädagogik als strenge praktische Wissenschaft. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R. D., Hasselbring, T. S., Kinzer, C. K. & Williams, S. M. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology, (pp. 115–141). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, pp. 32–41.
Bunge, M. (1998). Philosophy of Science: From Problem to Theory (revised edition, ed. Vol. 1). New Brunswick, London.
Case, R. (1978). A developmentally based theory and technology of instruction. Review of Educational Research, 48, pp. 439–463.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1991). Technology and the design of generative learning environments. Educational Technology, May, pp. 34–40.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). The Jasper project. Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
de Crook, M. B. M., Paas, E, Schlanbusch, H. & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2002). ADAPTIT: Tools for training design and evaluation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(4), pp. 47–58.
Dick, W. & Carey, L. (1996). The systematic design of instruction. New York: HarperCollins/College Publishers.
Fischer, E, Bouillion, L, Mandl, H. & Gomez, L. (2003). Scientific principles in Pasteur’s quadrant: integrating goals of understandig and use in learning enviroments research. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen & U. Hoppe (eds.), Designing for change in networked learning environments (pp. 493–502). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Gagné, R.M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction. 4th ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Gagné, R.M., Briggs, L. J. & Wagner, W.W. (1987). Principles of instructional design (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Gustafson, K.L. & Branch, R.M. (2002). What is instructional design? In J.V. Dempsey (ed.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 16–25). Upper Saddle River, NJ/Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Hannafin, M., Land, S. & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (ed.), Instructional-design theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 115–140). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Herrmann, T. (1994). Forschungsprogramme. In T. Herrmann & W.H. Tack (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Themenbereich B, Serie I, Bd. I: Methodologische Grundlagen der Psychologie (S. 251–294). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Jonassen, D. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (ed.), Instructional-design theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 215–239). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Krapp, A. & Heiland, A. (Hrsg.). (1981). Theorieanwendung und rationales Handeln (Bd. 4). Braunschweig: TU Braunschweig.
Mayer, R.E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Merrill, M.D. (1983). Component display theory. In CM. Reigeluth (ed.), Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 279–333). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Merrill, M.D. (1999). Instructional transaction theory (ITT): Instructional design based on knowledge objects. In C. M. Reigeluth (ed.), Instructional-design-Theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 397–424). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Merrill, M.D., Jones, M.K. & Li, Z. (1992). Instructional transaction theory: Classes of transactions. Educational Technology, 32, no. 6, pp. 12–26.
Mischo, C. & Rheinberg, F. (1995). Erziehungsziele von Lehrern und individuelle Bezugsnormen der Leistungsbewertung. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 9(3/4), S. 139–151.
Nelson, L.M. (1999). Collaborative problem solving. In C.M. Reigeluth (ed.), Instructional-design theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 241–267). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Reeves, B. & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation. How people treat computers, televisions, and new media like real people and places. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reigeluth, CM. (ed.) (1987). Instructional theories in action. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Reigeluth, CM. (ed.) (1983). Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Reimann, P. (1997). Lernprozesse beim Wissenserwerb aus Beispielen. Analyse, Modellierung, Förderung. Bern: Huber.
Renkl, A. (1994). Träges Wissen: Die „unerklärliche“ Kluft zwischen Wissen und Handeln. Forschungsbericht, 41.
Resnick, L.B. (1987). Task analysis in instructional design: Some cases from mathematics. In D. Klahr (ed.), Cognition and Instruction, pp. 51–80. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R. & Rollett, W. (2000). Motivation and action in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (S. 503–529). San Diego, San Francisco, New York: Academic Press.
Romiszowski, A.J. (1999). The development of physical skills: Introduction in the psychomotor domain. In C. M. Reigeluth (ed.), Instructional-design theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 457–481). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Roth, G. (2000). Das Gehirn und seine Wirklichkeit. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Sander, E. (1986). Lernhierarchien und kognitive Lernförderung. Göttingen, Toronto, Zürich: Hogrefe.
Schänk, R.C. (1998). Tell me a story. Narrative and intelligence (2nd printing (1st ed. 1990)). Evanston, Illinois: Nortwestern University Press.
Schänk, R. C. (2002). Designing world-class e-learning. New York, Chicago: McGraw-Hill.
Schänk, R. C, Berman, T. R. & Macpherson, K. A. (1999). Learning by doing. In C.M. Reigeluth (ed.), Instructional-design-Theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 161–182). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schwartz, D. L., Lin, X., Brophy, S. & Bransford, J. D. (1999). Toward the development of flexible adaptive instructional designs. In C. M. Reigeluth (ed.), Instructional-design-Theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 183–213). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Simon, H.A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell, Vic: ACER Press.
Tennyson, R.D. & Park, O.-C (1980). The teaching of concepts. A review of instructional design research literature. Review of Educational Research, 50(1), pp. 55–70.
van Gerven, P.W.M., Paas, F.G.W.C., van Mërrienboer, J.J.G. & Schmidt, H.G. (2002). Cognitive load theory and aging: effects of worked examples on training efficieny. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), pp. 87–105.
van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills. A four-component instructional design model for technical training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
van Merriënboer, J. J. G. & Dijkstra, S. (1997). The four-component instructional design model for training complex cognitive skills. In R. D. Tennyson, F. Schott, N. Seel & S. Dijkstra (eds.), Instructional design. International perspective. Vol.1: Theory, research, and models (pp. 427–445). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
van Merriënboer, J.J.G., Clark, R.E. & de Croock, M.B.M. (2002). Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-Model. Educational Technology Research & Development, 50(2), pp. 39–64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Niegemann, H.M., Hessel, S., Hochscheid-Mauel, D., Aslanski, K., Deimann, M., Kreuzberger, G. (2004). Die Konzeption von E-Learning: Wissenschaftliche Theorien, Modelle und Befunde. In: Kompendium E-Learning. X.media.press. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18677-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18677-6_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-62241-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18677-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive