Skip to main content

Ecological Status

  • Chapter
  • 93 Accesses

Part of the book series: International and European Environmental Policy Series ((ENVIRONMENTAL))

Abstract

As shown in the identification and designation process for HMWB and AWB (Step 5 of Fig. 2.1, p. 12), the likelihood of failing to achieve Good Ecological Status (GES) (or an estimate of what GES may be, based on current knowledge) should be assessed (WFD Annex II 1.5). Such an assessment is based on the information gathered on significant changes on hydromorphology and an assessment of the ecological status. The final guidance document on HMWB and AWB also noted that it should be considered whether the risk of failing GES is due to hydromorphological changes and not other pressures such as toxic substances or other quality problems. Step 5 is part of the “risk assessment” process1 to be completed by 22 December 2004 (WFD CIS Guidance Document No. 4 2003).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The “risk assessment” is undertaken as part of the WFD Article 5 characterisation process and identifies the likelihood of water bodies to fail the environmental quality objectives set under WFD Article 4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A guild consists of species which take over the same function within the ecosystem, have similar life-forms with respect to habitat use, feeding habits, temperature preference etc.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Natural accessibility involves the use of individual tributaries by migratory species and is governed by their ability to negotiate steep sections of the channel (tributary specific).

    Google Scholar 

  4. With regard to the proposed criteria where riparian vegetation played the most important role, it was noted that riparian plants may be good indicators for hydropower but may poorly predict ecological status of other elements such as fish and benthic invertebrate fauna. The risk therein is that future efforts to increase ecological status may focus on the chosen criteria alone. However, if process-related criteria are used, this risk maybe minimised.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kampa, E., Hansen, W. (2004). Ecological Status. In: Heavily Modified Water Bodies. International and European Environmental Policy Series. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18647-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18647-9_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-62219-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18647-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics