Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sectio caesarea

  • Chapter
Die Geburtshilfe

Zusammenfassung

Bis gegen Ende des 19. Jahrhunderts war der Kaiserschnitt eine Notmaßnahme zur Rettung der Mutter und stets eine tödliche Bedrohung von Mutter und Kind. Die Letalität der Mutter lag bei 60-100%. Die sinkende maternale Sectiomortalität hat neben den medizinischen, gesellschaftlichen und sozioökonomischen Faktoren eine neue Einstellung zur Sectioindikation entstehen lassen, die im Rahmen der Risiko-Güterabwägung zwischen vaginal-operativem und abdominalem Entbindungsweg zunehmend für den Letzteren entscheiden lässt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • ACOG (1998) Vaginal Birth After Previous Cesarean Delivery Clinical management guidelines

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander JW, Aerni S, Plettner JP (1985) Development of a safe and effective one-minute preoperative skin preparation. Arch Surg 120: 1357–1361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mufti R, McCarthy A, Fisk NM (1996) Obstetricians’ personal choice and mode of delivery. Lancet 347: 544

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ayers JW, Morley GW (1987) Surgery incision for C.S. Obstet Gynecol 70: 706–708

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barros FC, Vaughan JP, Victoria CG, Huttly SRA (1991) Epidemic of caesarean sections in Brazil. Lancet 338: 167–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bessinger CD Jr (1988) Preventing transmission of human immunodeficiency virus during operations. Surg Gynecol Obstet 167: 287–289

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bey WA, Pastorek II, Lu PY, Gabert H, Letellier RL, Miller JM (1993) Comparison of morbidity in cesarean section hysterectomy versus cesarean section tubal ligation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 177: 357–360

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham P, Lilford RJ (1987) Management of the selected term breech presentation: assessment of the risks of selected vaginal delivery versus cesarean section for all cases. Obstet Gynecol 69: 965–978

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Breymann C, Zimmermann R, Huch R, Huch A (1996) Use of recombinant human erythropoietin in combination with parenteral iron in the treatment of postpartum anaemia. Eur J Clin Invest 26: 123–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bukovsky I, Schneider D, Weinraub Z, Arieli S, Schreyer P, Caspi E (1983) Sterilization at the time of cesarean section: tubal ligation or hysterectomy?. Contraception 28: 349–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bundesamt für Gesundheit (1997) AIDS-Information. Bull 50

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke JF (1973) Use of preventive antibiotics in clinical surgery. Am Surg 39: 6–11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyay SK, Kharif H, Sherbeeni MM (1993) Placenta previa and accreta after previous caesarean section. Europ J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 52: 151–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chi I, Wilkens LR, Gates D, Lamptey P, Petrick T (1989) Tubal ligation at cesarean delivery in five asian centres: a comparison with tubal ligation soon after vaginal delivery. Int J Gynecol Obstet 30: 257–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cho JY, Kim SJ, Cha KY, Kay CW, Kim Ml, Cha KS (1991) Interrupted circular suture: bleeding control during cesarean delivery in placenta previa accreta. Obstet Gynecol 78: 876–879

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Combs AC, Murphy EL, Laros RK (1991) Factors associated with hemorrhage in cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 77: 77–82

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Obstetric Practice (1994) Vaginal delivery after a previous cesarean birth. ACOG Committee Opinion 143: 1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Depp R (1991) Caesarean delivery and other surgical procedures. In: Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson JL (eds) Obstetrics: normal and problem pregnancies. Churchill & Livingstone, New York, pp 643–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff P (1987) Prophylactic antibiotics for cesarean delivery: a simple costeffective strategy for prevention of postoperative morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 157: 794–798

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • European Collaborative Study (1994) Caesarean section and risk of vertical transmission of HIV-1 infection. Lancet 343: 1464–1467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischbach F, Loos W, Thurmayr R, Michelson A, Bauernfeind A, Graeff H (1986) Perioperative Antibiotikaprophylaxe mit Cefoxitin bei Kaiserschnitt. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 46: 706–709

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flamm BL, Newmann LA, Thomas SJ, Fallon D, Yoshida MM (1990) Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: results of a 5-year multicenter collaborative study. Obstet Gynecol 76: 750–754

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fox H (1972) Placenta accreta, 1945-1969. Obstet Gynecol Surv 27: 475–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs RS, De Cherney AH, Schwarz RH (1972) Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section: a double-blind study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 117: 419–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert WM, Moore TR, Resnik R, Doemeny J, Chin H, Bookstein JJ (1992) Angiographic embolization in the management of hemorrhagic complications of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166: 493–497

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glanz H (1996) Perkutane Katheterembolisation bei lebensbedrohlicher geburtshilflicher Blutung — ein Fallbericht. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 56: 504–507

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harri AD (1976) Comparison of transverse and vertical skin incision for C.S. S Afr Med J 52: 33–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauth JC, Owen J, Davis RO (1992) Transverse uterine incision closure: one versus two layers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 167: 1108–1111

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hickl EJ (2002) Wandlungen in der Kaiserschnittindikation. Gynäkol Geburtsh Rundschau 42: 15–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton P (1988) Surgical wound drainage: a survey of practices among gynaecologists in the British Isles. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 95: 1063–1069

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch HA, Neeser E (1984) Zur Wirksamkeit der perioperativen Antibiotika Prophylaxe bei Hysterektomie und abdominalen Schnittentbindungen. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilk 44: 8–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hohlfeld P (2002) Wunschsektio: eine Frage des gesunden Menschenverstandes. Gynäkol Geburtsh Rundschau 42: 19–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huch A (1991) Erythropoitein — its potentials in obstetrics. J Perinat Med 19, Suppl 2: 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Huch A (1997) Geburtsleitung bei Mehrungen. In: Kümzel W, Wulf KH (Hrsg) Frühgeburt. Urban & Schwarzenberg, München, S 167–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Huch R, Huch A (1994) Erythropoietin in obstetrics. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 8: 1021–1040

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huch A, Chaoni R, Huch R (2001) Sectio caesarea. UNI-MED, Bremen London Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull DB, Verner MW (1991) A randomized study of the closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 77: 818–820

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Husslein P (2002) Elektive Sectio. Gynäkol Geburtsh Rundschau 42: 22–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joel-Cohen S (1977) Abdominal und vaginal hysterectomy. New techniques based on time and motion studies. Lippincott & Raven, Philadelphia, pp 18–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone FD (1996) HIV and pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103: 1184–1190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kehrer FA (1897) Beiträge zur klinischen und experimentellen Geburtskunde und Gynäkologie. Roth, Gießen

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesson A, Sorrell T (1993) Human immunodeficiency virus infektion in pregnancy. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 7: 45–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kind C (1995) Mother-to-child-transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1: influence of parity and mode of delivery. Eur J Pediatr 154: 542–545

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • King JF (1993) Obstetric intervention and the economic imperative. Br J Obstet Gynecol 100: 303–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • König M, Bruha HA, Hirsch HA (1992) Handschuhperforationen bei gynäkologischen Operationen und abdominalen Schnittentbindungen. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilk 52: 109–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köppel R, Benz J (1986) Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität bei Kaiserschnitt durch risikoangepaßte, perioperative, antibiotische Kurzzeitprophylaxe. Gynäkol Rundsch 26: 1–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landesman SH, Kalish SH, Bums DN et al. (1996) Obstetrical factors and the transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 from mother to child. N Engl J Med 334: 1617–1623

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Latzko W (1909) Der extraperitoneale Kaiserschnitt, seine Geschichte, seine Technik und seine Indikationen. Wien Klin Wochenschr 22: 477–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung AS, Farmer RM, Leung EK, Medaeris AL, Paul RH (1993) Risk factors associated with uterine rupture during trial of labor after cesarean delivery: a case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168: 1358–1362

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lilford RJ, Van Coeverden, de Groot HA, Moore PJ, Bingham P (1990) The relative risks of caesarean section (intrapartum and elective) and vaginal delivery: a detailed analysis to exclude the effects of medical disorders and other acute preexisting physiological disturbances. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 97: 883–892

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lins FE, Fortney JA (1981) Caesarean section in four Rio de Janeiro Hospitals. Int J Gynecol Obstet 19: 27–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mandach U von, Fiedler R, Huch R, Huch A (1987) Ceftriaxin versus Cefoxitin in der antibiotischen Prophylaxe bei Kaiserschnitt mit erhöhtem Infektionsrisiko. Gynäkol Rundsch 27: 22–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandach U von, Huch R, Huch A (1989) Die antibiotische Prophylaxe bei Kaiserschnitt: Ceftriaxon versus Cefoxitin. Arch Gynaecol Obstet 246 (Suppl): 109–110

    Google Scholar 

  • McCurdy CM Jr, Magann EF, McCurdy CJ et al. (1992) The effect of placental management at cesarean delivery on operative blood loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol 167: 1363–1367

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane AJ (1988) Holding back the tide of caesarean section. BMJ 297: 852

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney WP, Young MJ (1990) The cumulative probability of occupationallyacquired HIV infection: the risk of repeated exposures during a surgical career. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 11: 247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead P (1989) AIDS: risk to the health profession. Clin Obstet Gynecol 32: 485–496

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller DA, Chollet JA, Goodwin TM (1997) Clinical risk factors for placenta previa — placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177: 210–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagele F, Karas H, Spitzer D, Staudach A, Karasegh S, Beck A, Husslein P (1996) Closure or nonclosure of the visceral peritoneum at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174: 1366–1370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen TF, Hagberg H, Lyungblad U (1989) Placenta praevia and antepartum hemorrhage after previous cesarean section. Gynecol Obstet Invest 27: 88–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary JA (1995) Uterine artery ligation in the control of postcesarean hemorrhage. J Reprod Med 40: 189–193

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pastorek II JG, White CA (1988) Surgical sterilization at the time of cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 15: 771–781

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Placek PJ, Taffel SM, Keppel KG (1983) Maternal and infant characteristics associated with cesarean section delivery. National Center for Health Statistics, Department of Health and Human Services, Hyattsville, MD; pub no 84, p 1232

    Google Scholar 

  • Placek PJ, Taffel SM, Smith JC, Maze JM (1981) Postpartum sterilization in cesarean section and non-cesarean section deliveries: United States, 1970–75. Am J Public Health 71: 1258–1261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peckham C, Gibb D (1985) Mother-to-child transmission of the immunodeficiency virus. N Engl J Med 333: 298–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rageth JC, Juzi C, Grossenbacher H (1999) Delivery after previous cesarean: a risk evaluation. Swiss Working Group of Obstetric and Gynécologie Institutions. Obstet Gynecol 93: 332–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richter K, Eiermann W (1983) Hysterektomiesektio oder Tubenkoagulation nach Kaiserschnitt — ein Vergleich. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 43: 209–212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues Al, Porter KB, O’Brien WR (1994) Blunt versus sharp expansion of the uterine incision in low segment cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171: 1022–1025

    Google Scholar 

  • Sänger M (1882) Der extraperitoneale Kaiserschnitt, seine Geschichte, seine Technik und seine Indikationen. Wien Klin Wochenschr 22: 477–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider RE (1996) HIV-Infektionen in der Schweiz. Internist (Berl) 37: 419–421

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider H (2002) Die Wunschsectio — Eine gleichwertige Alternative zur Spontangeburt?. Gynäkol Geburtsh Rundschau 42: 4–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider KTM (2002) Sectio nach Wunsch — Muss man hinsichtlich der Morbiditätsrisiken umdenken?. Gynäkol Geburtsh Rundschau 42: 12–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuttermann EB, Grimes DA (1983) Comparative safety of the low vertical uterine incision for cesarean delivery of breech infants. Obstet Gynecol 61: 593

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz WH, Grolle K (1981) The use of prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section. J Reprod Med 26: 595–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Soriano D, Dulitzki M, Keidar N, Barkai G, Mashiach S, Seidman DS (1996) Early oral feeding after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 87: 1006–1008

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford R (1990) Alternative strategies for controlling rising cesarean section rates. JAMA 263: 683–687

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stanko LM, Schrimmer DB, Paul RH, Mishell DR (1993) Emergency peripartum hysterectomy and associated risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168: 879–883

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark M, Finkel A (1994) A comparison between the Joel-Cohen and the Pfannenstiel incisions in cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 53: 121–122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sturdee DW, Rushton Dl (1986) Caesarean and post-partum hysterectomy 1968–1983. Br J Obst Gynaecol 93: 270–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • To WWK, Leung WC (1995) Placenta previa and previous cesarean section. Int J Gynecol Obstet 51: 25–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tovo PA (1993) Caesarean section and perinatal HIV transmission: what next?. Lancet 342: 630

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Villeneuve MG, Khalife S, Marcoux S et al. (1990) Surgical staples in cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 163: 1641–1646

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walker WJ (1996) Case report: successful internal iliac artery embolisation with glue in case of massive obstetric haemorrhage. Clin Radiol 51: 442–444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Welsch H (1995) Mütterliche Sectio-Sterblichkeit — eine kritische Bilanz. Arch Gynecol Obstet 257: 206–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (1997) Report on the global HIV/AIDS epidemic

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EA, Dilts PV, Simpson TJ (1973) Comparative morbidity of postpartum sterilization procedures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 115: 884–889

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. A. Huch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Chaoui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Ehem. Direktor der Universitätsfrauenklinik am Inselspital Bern, Ahornweg 4, 3122, Kehrsatz, Schweiz

    Henning Schneider

  2. Abteilung für Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, österreich

    Peter Husslein

  3. Abteilung für Perinatalmedizin Frauenklinik und Poliklinik des Klinikums rechts der Isar, Universität der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, München

    Karl-Theo M. Schneider

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Huch, A., Chaoui, R. (2004). Sectio caesarea. In: Schneider, H., Husslein, P., Schneider, KT.M. (eds) Die Geburtshilfe. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18574-8_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18574-8_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-30522-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18574-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation