Skip to main content

Abstract

Irritant contact dermatitis (ICD), defined as “a nonimmunologic local inflammatory reaction characterized by erythema, edema, or corrosion following single or repeated application of a chemical substance to an identical cutaneous site” (Mathias and Maibach 1994), is a leading cause of occupational disease in dermatology and causes economic damage to workers, companies, and social security systems world-wide. The perception of ICD as more trivial than the more intellectually appealing problem of allergic sensitization has recently changed dramatically. In Germany, skin diseases are the second most frequent occupational disease following museuloskeletal disorders, and most oeeupational dermatoses are eases of contact dermatitis. Among these ICD is probably more frequent than allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), although reliable data are still very limited. In contrast to ACD, ICD is defined as being the result of a primarily unspecific damage to the skin. It is not a clinical entity, but rather a spectrum of diseases. The clinical aspect of ICD is determined by the dose-effect relationship (Patil and Maibach 1994). The morphology of acute ICD shows erythema, edema, vesicles that may coalesce, bullae, and oozing (Figs. 1, Figs. 2). Necrosis and ulceration is seen with corrosive materials (Fig. 3).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aoki T, Kageyama R (1989) Three cases of dry cleaning dermatitis. Nippon Hifuka Gakkai Zasshi 9:1035–1038

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth J, Rycroft RJG, Waddy RS (1993) Irritant contact dermatitis in warehouse employees. Occup Med 43:32–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Avnstorp C (1996) Irritant cement eczema. In: van der Valk PGM, Maibach HI (eds) The irritant contact dermatitis syndrome. CRC Press, New York, pp 11l-1l9

    Google Scholar 

  • Berardesca E, Distante F (1995) Mechanisms of skin irritation. In: Elsner P, Maibach HI (eds) Irritant dermatitis: new clinieal and experimental aspects. Karger, Basel, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Berardesca E, Maibach HI (1988) Racial differences in sodium lauryl sulphate induced cutaneous irritation: black and white. Contact Dermatitis 18:65–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berndt U, Hinnen U, Iliev D, Elsner P (1999) Role of the atopy score and of single atopie features as risk factors for the development of hand eczema in trainee metal workers. Br J Dermatol 140:922–924

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Binniek AN (1981) Allergie and irritant contact dermatitis. Compr Ther 1:17–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Brasch L, Burgard J, Sterry W (1992) Common pathogenetic pathways in allergie and irritant contact dermatitis. J Invest Derrnatol 98:166–170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruze M, Emmett EA (1990) Occupational exposures to irritants. In: Iackson EM, Goldner P (eds) Irritant contact dermatitis. Dekker, New York, pp 81–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleenewerck MB, Martin P (1996) Irritants: food. In: van der Valk PGM, Maibach HI (eds) The irritant contact dermatitis syndrome. CRCPress, New York, pp 157–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Coenraads PJ, Smit J (1995) Epidemiology. In: Rycroft RJG, Menn T, Frosch PJ (eds) Textbook of contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 133–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Conde Salazar L, Gomez J, Meza B, Guimaraens D (1993) Artefactual irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 28:246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin E. (1980) Contact dermatitis. Churchill Livingston, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin E. (1987) Dermatitis ofthe hands in caterers. Contact Dermatitis 17:265–269

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin E. (1995) Hand eczema. In: Rycroft RJG, Menn T, Frosch PJ (eds) Textbook of contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 207–218

    Google Scholar 

  • de Boer EM, van Ketel WG, Bruynzeel DP (1989) Dermatoses in metal workers I: Irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 20:212–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diepgen TL, Coenraads PJ (1995) What can we learn from epidemiologieal studies on irri tant contact dermatitis? In: Elsner P, Maibach HI (eds) Irritant dermatitis: new clinieal and experimental aspects. Karger, Basel, pp 18–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooms-Goossens AE, Debusschere KM, Gevers DM, Dupre KM, Degreef HJ, Loncke JP, Snauwoert JE (1986) Contact dermatitis caused by airborne agent. A review and case reports. J Am Acad Dermatol 15:1–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eiehmann A, Amgwerd D (1992) Toxische Kontaktdermatitis. Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax 19:615–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsner P, Maibach HI (1993) Irritant and allergie contact dermatitis. In: Elsner P, Martius J (eds) Vulvovaginitis. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsner P (1994) Irritant dermatitis in the workplace. Dermatol Clin 12:461–467

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elsner P, Baxmann F, Liehr HM (1995) Metal working fluid dermatitis: A comparative follow-up study in patients with irritant and non-irritant hand dermatitis. In: Elsner P, Maibach HI (eds) Irritant dermatitis: new c1inieal and experimental aspects. Karger, Basel, pp 77–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Erntestarn L, Ollmar S (1993) Electrieal impedance index in human skin: measurements after occlusion in 5 anatomieal regions and in mild irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 28:104–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foulds IS, Koh D (1990) Dermatitis from metalworking fluids. Clin Exp Dermatol 15: 157–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fregert S (1981) Manual of contact dermatitis, 2nd edn. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, pp 5562

    Google Scholar 

  • Frosch PJ (1989) Irritant contact dermatitis. In: Frosch PJ, Dooms-Goossens A, Lachapelle JM, Rycroft RJG, Seheper RJ (eds) Current topies in contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 385–403

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frosch PJ. (1995) Cutaneous irritation. In: Rycroft RJG, Menn T, Frosch PJ (eds) Textbook of contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 28–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Frosch PJ, Kligman AM (1977) A method for appraising the stinging capacity of topieally applied substances. Soc Cosmet Chem 28:197–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Gan SL, Goh CL, Lee CS (1987) Occupational dermatitis among sanders in the furniture industry. Contact Dermatitis 17:237–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaspari AA (1997) The role of keratinocytes in the pathophysiology of contact dermatitis. Immun Allergy Clin 17:377–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawkrodger DJ, Lloyd MH, Hunter JA (1986) Occupational skin disease in hospital cleaning and kitchen workers. Contact Dermatitis 15:132–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goh C (1987) Occupational skin disease in Singapore: epidemiology and causative agents. Ann Acad Med Singapore 16(2):303–305

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goh CL, Yuen R (1994) A study of occupational skin disease in the metal industry (1986–1990). Ann Acad Med Singapore 23:639–644

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goh CL (1995) Noneczematous contact react ions. In: Rycroft RJG, Menn T, Frosch PJ (eds) Textbook of contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg New York, pp 221–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh CL (1997) Prognosis of contact and occupational dermatitis. Clin Dermatol 15:655–659

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldner R (1994) Work-related irritant contact dermatitis. Occup Med 9:37–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt H, Panizzon RG (1991) Radiation therapy of benign tumors, hyperplasias, and dermatoses. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafner J, Rüegger M, Kralieek P, Elsner P (1995) Airborne irritant contact dermatitis from metal dust adhering to semisynthetie working suits. Contact Dermatitis 32:285–288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan DJ, Dannaker CJ, Maibach HI (1990) The prognosis of contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 23:300–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan DJ (1996) The prognosis of irritant contact dermatitis. In: van der Valk PGM, Maibach HI (eds) The irritant contact dermatitis syndrome. CRC Press, New York, pp 9–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurwitz RM, Rivera HP, Guin JD (1984) Black-spot poison ivy dermatitis. An acute irritant contact dermatitis superimposed upon an allergie contact dermatitis. Am J Dermatopathol 6: 319–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iliev D, Elsner P (1997) Clinieal irritant contact dermatitis syndromes. Immun Allergy Clin 17:365–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iliev D, Hinnen U, Elsner P (1998) Skin bioengineering methods in occupational dermatology. In: Elsner P, Barel AO, Berardesca E, Gabard E, Serup J (eds) Skin bioengineering techniques and applications in dermatology and cosmetology. Karger, Basel, pp 145–150

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Itschner L, Hinnen U, Elsner P (1996) Prevention of hand eczema in the metal-working industry: risk awareness and behaviour of metal worker apprentiees. Dermatology 193:226–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R (1988) Occupational skin disease in Finland. An analysis of 10 years of statisties from an occupational dermatology dinie. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 60:89–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) (2000) Handbook of Occupational Dermatology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassis V, Vedel P, Darre E (1984) Contact dermatitis to methyl methacrylate. Contact Dermatitis 11:26–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lachapelle JM (1986) Industrial airborne irritant or allergie contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 14:137–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lachapelle JM (1995) Principles of prevention and protection in contact dermatitis (with special reference to occupational dermatology). In: Rycroft RJG, Menn T, Frosch PJ (eds) Textbook of contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg New York, pp 695–702

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammintausta K, Maibach HI (1990) Contact dermatitis due to irritation: general principles, etiology, and histology. In: Adams RM (eds) Occupational skin disease. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammintausta K, Maibach HI, Wilson D (1987) Irritant reactivity in males and females. Contact Dermatitis 17:276–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lammintausta K, Maibach HI, Wilson D (1988) Mechanisms of subjective (sensory) irritation. Propensity to non-immunologie contact urtiearia and objective irritation in stingers. Derm Beruf Umwelt 36:45–49

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lauerma AI, Stein BD, Homey B, Lee CH, Bloom E, Maibach HI (1994) Topieal FK506: suppression of allergie and irritant contact dermatitis in the guinea pig. Arch Dermatol Res 286:337–340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malten KE, den Arend JA (1985) Irritant contact dermatitis: traumiterative and cumulative impairment by cosmeties, climate, and other daily loads. Derm Beruf Umwelt 33:125–132

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malten KE, den Arend JA, Wiggers RE (1979) Delayed irritation: hexanediol diacrylate and butanediol diacrylate. Contact Dermatitis 3:178–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malten KE (1981) Thoughts on irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 7:238–247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathias CG (1990) Prevention of occupational contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 23:742–748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathias CGT, Maibach HI (1987) Dermatotoxicology monographs. 1. Cutaneous irritation: factors influencing the response to irritants. Clin Toxicol 13:333–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meding B, Swanbeck G (1990) Occupational hand eczema in an industrial city. Contact Dermatitis 22:13–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meding B (1990) Epidemiology of hand eczema in an industrial city. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) (Suppl) 153:1–43

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moshell AN (1997) Workshop on irritant contact dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermatitis 8:79–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson E (1986) Individual and environmental risk factors for hand eczema in hospital workers. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) (Suppl) 128:1–63

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pinnagoda J, Tupker RA, Smit JA, Coenraads PJ, Nater JP (1989) The intra-and inter-individual variability and reliability of transepidermal water loss measurements. Contact Dermatitis 21:255–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rietschel RL (1997) Comparison of allergie and irritant dermatitis. Immun Allergy Clin 17:359–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rycroft RJG (1997) Metal working industry. Clin Dermatol 15:565–566

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rystedt I (1985) Work-related hand eczema in atopies. Contact dermatitis 12:164–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seidenari S (1996) Skin sensitivity, interindividual factors: atopy. In: van der Valk PGM, Maibach (eds) The irritant contact dermatitis syndrome. CRC Press, New York, pp 267–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Singgih SI, Lantingha H, Nater JP, Woest TE, Kruyt-Gaspersz JA (1986) Occupational hand dermatoses in hospital deaning personnel. Contact Dermatitis 14:14–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skogstad M, Levy F (1994) Occupational irritant contact dermatitis and fungal infection in construction workers. Contact dermatitis 31:28–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soschin D, Kligman AM (1982) Adverse subjective reactions. In: Kligman AM, Leyden JJ (eds) Safety and efficacy of topieal drugs and cosmeties. Grune and Stratton, New York, pp 377–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter-Widmer J, Elsner P (1994) Age and irritation. In: van der Valk PGM, Maibach HI (eds) The Irritant contact dermatitis syndrome. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 257–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Uter W, Gefeller 0, Schwanitz HJ (1995) Occupational dermatitis in hairdressing apprentiees. In: Elsner P, Maibach HI (eds) Irritant dermatitis. New cIinieal and experimental aspects. Karger, Basel, pp 49–55

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk PGM, Maibach HI (1989) Do topieal cortieosteroids modulate skin irritation in human beings? Assesment by trans epidermal water loss and visual scoring. J Am Acad Dermatol 21:519–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk PGM, Nater JP, Bleumink E (1985) Vulnerability of the skin to surfactants in different groups of eczema patients and controls as measured by water vapour loss. Clin Exp Dermatol 10:98–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van der Walle HB, Brunsveld VM (1994) Dermatitis in hairdressers. 1. The experience of the past 4 years. Contact Dermatitis 30:217–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (1994) Prevention of contact dermatitis. In: Mellström GA, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Protective gloves for occupational use. CRC Press, New York, pp 7–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall L, Gebauer K (1991) A follow-up study of occupational skin disease in Western Australia. Contact Dermatitis 524:241–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigger-Alberti W, Elsner P (1997) Preventive measures in contact dermatitis. Clin Dermatol 15:661–665

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wigger-Alberti W, Elsner P (1998) Do barrier creams and gloves prevent or provoke contact dermatitis? Am J Contact Dermatitis 9:100–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wigger-Alberti W, Hinnen U, Elsner P (1997) Predietive testing of metalworking fluids: a comparison of 2 cumulative human irritation models and correlation to epidemiologieal data. Contact Dermatitis 36:14–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm KP, Surber C, Maibach HI (1989) Quantification of sodium lauryl sulphate irritant dermatitis in man: comparison of four techniques: skin color, reflectance, transepidermal water loss, laser Doppler flow measurement and visual scores. Arch Dermatol Res 281:293–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson JD, Willis CM (1998) Contact dermatitis: irritant. In: Champion RH, Burton JL, Bums DA, Breathnach SM (eds) Textbook of dermatology, 6th edn. Blackwell, London, pp 709–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis CM (1996) The histopathology of irritant contact dermatitis. In: van der Valk PGM, Maibach HI (eds) The irritant contact dermatitis syndrome. CRC Press, New York, pp 291–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood BP, Greig DE (1997) Catering industry. Cin Dermatol 15:567–571

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wrangsjö K, Meding B (1997) Hospital workers. Clin Dermatol 15:573–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wigger-Alberti, W., Frank, U., Elsner, P. (2004). Contact Dermatitis Due to Irritation. In: Kanerva, L., Elsner, P., Wahlberg, J.E., Maibach, H.I. (eds) Condensed Handbook of Occupational Dermatology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18556-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18556-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44348-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18556-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics