Skip to main content

Identification and Assessment in Relation to the Material Safety Data Sheets

  • Chapter
Condensed Handbook of Occupational Dermatology
  • 378 Accesses

Abstract

The manufacturer’s material safety data sheet (MSDS) represents the primary source of information on safety issues related to the material or product to which it is related. It is thus a first point of call for the dermatologist trying to judge whether a particular product/substance might be responsible for a case of occupational skin disease under consideration. Even though current MSDSs are of great help, they may not be exact enough from a dermato-allergist’s point of view (Kanerva et al. 1997).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barratt MD (1996) Quantitative structure activity relationships for skin irritation and corrosivity of neutral and electrophilic organic chemicals. Toxicol In Vitro 10:247–256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barratt MD, Basketter DA, Roberts DW (1997) Quantitative structure activity relationships. In: Le Poittevin J-P, Basketter DA, Dooms-Goossens A, Karlberg AT (eds) The molecular basis of allergic contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 129–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Basketter DA, Blaikie L, Dearman RJ, Kimber I, Ryan CA, Gerberick GF, Harvey P, Evans P, White IR, Rycroft RJG (2000) Use of the Local Lymph Node Assay for the Estimation of Relative Contact Allergenic Potency. Contact Dermatitis 42:344–348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Consumer Product Safety Commission (1979) Federal Hazardous Substances Act, Code of Federal Regulations. Title 16, part 1500.42. Federal Register

    Google Scholar 

  • Draize JH, Woodard G, Calvery HO (1944) Methods for the study of imitation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 82:377–390

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Draize JH (1959) Dermal toxicity. In: Appraisal of the safety of chemicals in foods, drugs and cosmetics. Association of Foods and Drugs Officials of the United States, Littleton, pp 46–59

    Google Scholar 

  • European Community (1988) Council Directive of 7 June 1988 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the classification, packaging and labeling of dangerous preparations. Off J Eur Communities L18:14

    Google Scholar 

  • European Community (1992) Annex to Commission Directive 92/69/EEC of 31July 1992 adapting to technical progress for the seventeenth time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances, Off J Eur Communities L383A:35

    Google Scholar 

  • European Community (1993) Council regulation EEC No 793/93 of 23 March 1993 on the evaluation and control of the risks of existing substances. Off J Eur Communities Ll8:14

    Google Scholar 

  • European Community (1996) Annex V. Off J Eur Communities L248/226

    Google Scholar 

  • European Community (2001) Commission Directive 2001l58/EC dated 7/812001. Off J Eur Communities L212/24

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Drug Administration (1972) United States — Food and Drug Administration. Hazardous substances. Proposed revisions of test for primary skin irritants. Fed Reg 37:27635

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankild S, Basketter DA, Andersen KE (1996) The value and limitations of rechallenge in the guinea pig maximisation test. Contact Dermatitis 35:135–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hannuksela A, Hannuksela M (1995) Irritant effects of a detergent in wash and chamber tests. Contact Dermatitis 32:163–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R (1996) Allergy caused by acrylics — past, present and prevention. In: Elsner P, Lachapelle JM, Wahlberg J, Maibach HI (eds) Prevention of contact dermatitis (Curr Probl Dermatol, vol 25). Karger, Basel, pp 86–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanerva L, Henriks-Eckerman M-L, Jolanki R, Estlander T (1997) Plastics/acrylics: material safety data sheets need to be improved. Clin Dermatol 15:533–546

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karlberg A-T, Basketter DA, Goossens A, Lepoittevin J-P (1999) Regulatory classification of substances oxidized to skin sensitizers by exposure to the air, Contact Dermatitis 40:183–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karlberg A-T, Bohlinder K, Boman A, Haeksell U, Hermansson J, Jacobsson S, Nilsson JLG (1988) Identification of 15-hydroperoxyabietic acid as a contact allergen in Portugese colophony. J Pharm Pharmacol 40:42–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karlberg A-T, Goossens A (1997) Contact allergy to oxidized S,D-limonene among contact dermatitis patients. Contact Dermatitis 37:308–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (1993) Skin sensitisation test guideline 406

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2002) Skin sensitisation test guideline 429

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson MK, Nusair TL, Fletcher ER, Ritz HL (1990) A review of the Buehler guinea pig skin sensitisation test and its use in a risk assessment process for human skin sensitization. Toxicology 61:91–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1993) Recommendations in the transport of dangerous goods, 8th edn. United Nations ST/SG.AC.10/REv 8:185

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil CS, Scala A (1971) Study of intra-and inter-laboratory variability in the results of rabbit eye and skin irritation tests. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 19:276–360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whittle E, Barratt MD, Carter JA, Basketter DA, Chamberlain M (1996) Use of QSAR and an in vitro skin corrosivity test to investigate the corrosion/irritation potential of organic acids. Toxicol In Vitro 10:95–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Basketter, D.A., Kanerva, L. (2004). Identification and Assessment in Relation to the Material Safety Data Sheets. In: Kanerva, L., Elsner, P., Wahlberg, J.E., Maibach, H.I. (eds) Condensed Handbook of Occupational Dermatology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18556-4_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18556-4_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44348-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18556-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics