Abstract
Since the introduction of the first combined PET/CT scanner in 1998, diffusion of this technology into the clinical arena has been rapid, more reminiscent of the adoption of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the early eighties than the slower acceptance of positron emission tomography (PET). For almost two decades, PET was viewed primarily as a research tool until Medicare approval, in 1998, of PET imaging for the diagnosis and staging of a number of different cancers. With this approval, the role of PET in oncology increased significantly from 1999 onwards. Coinciding with the growth in PET, the first commercial PET/CT scanners appeared in the clinic in early 2001, further advancing the adoption of PET in oncology by bringing functional imaging with radioactive tracers directly to the radiological community. As the benefits of imaging anatomy and function in the same scanner has become more widely appreciated, the demand for the technology has increased to a point where, in less than three years, over 300 such units are now installed in medical institutions worldwide. The trend from PET to PET/CT is confirmed by vendors whose PET/CT sales now represent up to 80% of the PET market.
Keywords
- Positron Emission Tomography Scanner
- Dedicated Positron Emission Tomography
- Positron Emission Tomography Detector
- Noise Effective Count
- Noise Equivalent Count Rate
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beyer T, Townsend DW, Brun T, Kinahan PE, Charron M, Roddy R, Jerin J, Young J, Byars L, Nutt R. A combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology. J Nucl Med. 2000;41(8):1369–1379.
Charron M, Beyer T, Bohnen NN, Kinahan PE, Dachille MA, Jerin J, Nutt R, Meltzer CC, Villemagne V, Townsend DW. Image analysis in patients with cancer studied with a combined PET and CT scanner. Clin Nucl Med. 2000;25(11): 905–910.
Kluetz PG, Meltzer CC, Villemagne VL, Kinahan PE, Chander S, Martinelli MA, Townsend DW. Combined PET/CT imaging in oncology: impact on patient management. Clin Positron Imaging. 2001;3(6):223–230.
Meltzer CC, Martinelli MA, Beyer T, Kinahan PE, Charron M, McCook B, Townsend DW. Whole-body FDG PET imaging in the abdomen: value of combined PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2001;42(5 Suppl):35P.
Meltzer CC, Snyderman CH, Fukui MB, Bascom DA, Chander S, Johnson JT, Myers EN, Martinelli MA, Kinahan PE, Townsend DW. Combined FDG PET/CT imaging in head and neck cancer: impact on patient management. J Nucl Med. 2001;42(5 Suppl):36P.
Townsend DW, Beyer T, Blodgett TM. PET/CT scanners: a hardware approach to image fusion. Semin Nucl Med. 2003;33(3): 193–204.
Cho ZH, Farukhi MR. Bismuth germanate as a potential scintillation detector in positron cameras. J Nucl Med. 1977;18(8):840–844.
Takagi K, Fukazawa T. Cerium-activated Gd2SiO5 single crystal scintillator. App Phys Lett. 1983;42(1):43–45.
Melcher CL, Schweitzer JS. Cerium-doped lutetium oxyorthosilicate: a fast, efficient new scintillator. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1992;39(4):502–505.
Strother SC, Casey ME, Hoffman EJ. Measuring PET scanner sensitivity: relating countrates to image signal-to-noise ratios using noise equivalent counts. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1990;37(2):783–788.
Kinahan PE, Townsend DW, Beyer T, Sashin D. Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. Med Phys. 1998;25(10):2046–2053.
Burger C, Goerres G, Schoenes S, Buck A, Lonn AH, von Schultess GK. PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29(7):922–927.
Beyer T, Antoch G, Blodgett T, Freudenberg L, Akhurst T, Mueller S. Dual-modality PET/CT imaging: the effect of respiratory motion on combined image quality in clinical oncology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30(4): 588–596.
Osman MM, Cohade C, Nakamoto Y, Marshall LT, Leal JP, Wahl RL. J. Clinically significant inaccurate localization of lesions with PET/CT: frequency in 300 patients. J Nucl Med. 2003;44(2):240–243.
Yau YY., Coel M, Chan WS, Tarn YM, Wong S. Application of IV contrast in PET-CT: does it really produce attenuation correction error? J Nucl Med. 2003;44(5 Suppl):272P.
Carney JP, Beyer T, Brasse D, Yap JT, Townsend DW. Clinical PET/CT scanning using oral CT contrast agents. J Nucl Med. 2002;43(5 Suppl):57P.
Cohade C, Osman M, Marshall L, Wahl RL. Metallic object artifacts on PET-CT: clinical and phantom studies. J Nucl Med. 2002;43(5 Suppl):308P.
Halpern B, Dahlbom M, Vranjesevic D, Ratib O, Schiepers C, Silverman DH, Waldherr C, Quon A, Czernin J. LSO-PET/CT whole body imaging in 7 minutes: is it feasible? J Nucl Med. 2003;44(5 Suppl):380P–381P.
Nutt RE, Nutt R. Combined PET and CT detector and method for using same. US Patent No. 6, 449, 331. 2002.
Nahmias C, Nutt R, Hichwa RD, Czernin J, Melcher C, Schmand M, Andreaco M, Eriksson L, Casey M, Moyers C, Michel C, Bruckbauer T, Conti M, Bendriem B, Hamill J. PET tomograph designed for five minute routine whole body studies. J Nucl Med. 2002;43(5 Suppl):11P.
Casey ME, Nutt R. A multicrystal, two dimensional BGO detector system for positron emission tomography. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1986;33(1):460–463.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Townsend, D. (2004). A Future for PET/CT. In: Atlas of PET/CT Imaging in Oncology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18517-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18517-5_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-62141-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18517-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive