Skip to main content

Anatomical Masses vs. Viable Tumor

  • Chapter
Atlas of PET/CT Imaging in Oncology

Abstract

The extent of tumor viability by FDG-PET differs significantly from size of tumors as determined by CT. This discrepancy has important implications for biopsy and radiation planning. PET/CT allows a targeted approach to these interventions. Molecular PET imaging with FDG is the only non-invasive tool that permits to differentiate viable tumor from benign anatomical masses. The identification of viable tumor will gain considerable importance in the planning of biopsies and radiation treatment. It is hoped that a PET based approach to these interventions will result in higher diagnostic accuracy of biopsies and in more accurate delineation of the radiation target.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Suggested Reading

  • Hain SF, Curran KM, Beggs AD, Fogelman I, O’Doherty MJ, Maisey MN. FDG-PET as a “metabolic biopsy” tool in thoracic lesions with indeterminate biopsy. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28(9):1336–1340.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brahme A. Biologically optimized 3-dimensional in vivo predictive assay-based radiation therapy using positron emission tomography-computerized tomography imaging. Acta Oncol. 2003;42(2):123–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jang S, Greskovich JF, Milla BA, Zhang Y, Nelson AD, Devlin AL, Faulhaber PF. Effects of PET/CT image registration on radiation treatment planning in lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57(2 Suppl):S414–S415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciernik IF, Dizendorf E, Baumert BG, Reiner B, Burger C, Davis JB, Lutolf UM, Steinert HC, Von Schulthess GK. Radiation treatment planning with an integrated positron emission and computer tomography (PET/CT): a feasibility study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57(3):853–863.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley JD, Perez CA, Dehdashti F, Siegel BA. Implementing biologic target volumes in radiation treatment planning for non-small cell lung cancr. J Nucl Med. 2004;45(Suppl 1):96S–101S.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Czernin, J., Dahlbom, M., Ratib, O., Schiepers, C. (2004). Anatomical Masses vs. Viable Tumor. In: Atlas of PET/CT Imaging in Oncology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18517-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18517-5_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-62141-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18517-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics