Abstract
This chapter introduces the role of uncontrollable risks such as comorbidity for the physician’s decisions. With this kind of risk underlying his test and treatment decisions, the concept of prudence becomes relevant. We demonstrate that prudent decision makers act even earlier than simply risk averse ones.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Kimball, M. – Precautionary Saving in the Small and in the Large – Econometrica, 58(1): 53–73, 1990, p. 54.
- 2.
Prudence is in principle also compatible with risk loving, though not with risk neutrality.
- 3.
A further case – not discussed here – is that the decision maker is risk loving \( \left( {U^{\prime\prime} > 0} \right) \) and, depending on the third derivative of his utility function, also either prudent or imprudent.
- 4.
The test and treatment thresholds can be found by setting the value of information in the two arms of (6.14) equal to zero and solving for p.
References
Courbage, C., & Rey, B. (2006). Prudence and optimal prevention for health risks. Health Economics, 15(12), 1323–1327.
Deck, C., & Schlesinger, H. (2010). Exploring higher order risk effects. Review of Economic Studies, 77(4), 1403–1420.
Ebert, S. & Wiesen, D. (2011). Testing for prudence and skewness seeking. Management Science, forthcoming.
Eeckhoudt, L. (2002). Risk and medical decision making. Boston: Kluwer.
Eeckhoudt, L., & Gollier, C. (2005). The impact of prudence on optimal prevention. Economic Theory, 26(4), 989–994.
Eeckhoudt, L., & Schlesinger, H. (2006). Putting risk in its proper place. American Economic Review, 96, 280–289.
Eeckhoudt, L., & Kimball, M. (1992). Background risk, prudence and the demand for insurance. In G. Dionne (Ed.), Contributions to insurance economics (pp. 239–254). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Gomes, F., & Michaelides, A. (2005). Optimal life-cycle asset allocation: Understanding the empirical evidence. Journal of Finance, 60(2), 869–904.
Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644–1655.
Kimball, M. (1990). Precautionary saving in the small and in the large. Econometrica, 58(1), 53–73.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Felder, S., Mayrhofer, T. (2011). Treatment Decisions Under Comorbidity Risk. In: Medical Decision Making. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18330-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18330-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-18329-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18330-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)