Skip to main content

Treatment Decisions Under Comorbidity Risk

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1223 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces the role of uncontrollable risks such as comorbidity for the physician’s decisions. With this kind of risk underlying his test and treatment decisions, the concept of prudence becomes relevant. We demonstrate that prudent decision makers act even earlier than simply risk averse ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Kimball, M. – Precautionary Saving in the Small and in the Large – Econometrica, 58(1): 53–73, 1990, p. 54.

  2. 2.

    Prudence is in principle also compatible with risk loving, though not with risk neutrality.

  3. 3.

    A further case – not discussed here – is that the decision maker is risk loving \( \left( {U^{\prime\prime} > 0} \right) \) and, depending on the third derivative of his utility function, also either prudent or imprudent.

  4. 4.

    The test and treatment thresholds can be found by setting the value of information in the two arms of (6.14) equal to zero and solving for p.

References

  • Courbage, C., & Rey, B. (2006). Prudence and optimal prevention for health risks. Health Economics, 15(12), 1323–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deck, C., & Schlesinger, H. (2010). Exploring higher order risk effects. Review of Economic Studies, 77(4), 1403–1420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, S. & Wiesen, D. (2011). Testing for prudence and skewness seeking. Management Science, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt, L. (2002). Risk and medical decision making. Boston: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt, L., & Gollier, C. (2005). The impact of prudence on optimal prevention. Economic Theory, 26(4), 989–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt, L., & Schlesinger, H. (2006). Putting risk in its proper place. American Economic Review, 96, 280–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt, L., & Kimball, M. (1992). Background risk, prudence and the demand for insurance. In G. Dionne (Ed.), Contributions to insurance economics (pp. 239–254). Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, F., & Michaelides, A. (2005). Optimal life-cycle asset allocation: Understanding the empirical evidence. Journal of Finance, 60(2), 869–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644–1655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, M. (1990). Precautionary saving in the small and in the large. Econometrica, 58(1), 53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Felder .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Felder, S., Mayrhofer, T. (2011). Treatment Decisions Under Comorbidity Risk. In: Medical Decision Making. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18330-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18330-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-18329-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18330-0

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics