Advertisement

Beyond the Panopticon Framework: Privacy, Control and User Generated Content

  • Manuela Farinosi
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6456)

Abstract

The overall purpose of this contribution is to explore the meaning and significance of the terms control and privacy in the light of the intensive diffusion of user generated content (UGC). Every day a large number of people all over the world use digital media to share personal details with a vast network of friends and, often, with an unspecified number of strangers producing long lasting digital information. My exploratory analysis is based on 145 compositions written by students from Udine University (aged between 19 and 27). The data from the texts were content‐analysed and were then categorized and analysed from a qualitative point of view to understand how young people frame the topic of privacy on the Web. The results show that it is possible to identify ten macrocategories: Privacy, Participation and Sharing, Visibility, Persistence, Replicability and Searchability, Exhibitionism, Risks, Horizontal Control, Invisible Audiences, Vertical Control, Protection, Distrust.

Keywords

Privacy Control UGC social media interfaces 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lyon, D.: Surveillance society. Monitoring everyday life. Open University Press, Buckingham (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zwerger, I., Medosch, A.: Goodbye Privacy! Welcome Publicity? In: Stocker, G., Schopf, C. (eds.) Ars Electronica 2007: Goodbye Privacy, pp. 16–25. Hatje Cantz, Ostfildern (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Livingstone, S.: Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Soc. 10(3), 393–411 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fuchs, C.: StudiVZ: social networking in the surveillance society. Ethics Inf. Technol. 12(2), 171–185 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fogel, J., Nehmad, E.: Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns. Comp. Hum. Beh. 25(1), 153–160 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gross, R., Acquisti, A.: Information revelation and privacy in online Social Networks (The Facebook case). In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society, pp. 71–80. ACM, New York (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tufekci, Z.: Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online Social Network Sites. Bull. Sci. Tech. Soc. 28(1), 20–36 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mynatt, E.D., Nguyen, D.H.: Making Ubiquitous Computing Visible. In: ACM CHI 2001 Conference Workshop on Building the Ubiquitous Computing User Experience - Position paper (2001), http://www2.parc.com/csl/projects/ubicomp-workshop/positionpapers/mynatt.pdf
  9. 9.
    Rundle, M., Conley, C.: Ethical Implications of Emerging Technologies: A Survey. UNESCO, Paris (2007), http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001499/149992E.pdf Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cascio, J.: The Rise of the Participatory Panopticon. WorldChanging (2005), http://www.worldchanging.com/archives//002651.html
  11. 11.
    Albrechtslund, A.: Online Social Networking as participatory surveillance. First Monday 13(3) (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Peterson, C.: Saving Face: The Privacy Architecture of Facebook. Senior Thesis, University of Massachusetts-Amherst (2009), http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=cpeterson
  13. 13.
    Boyd, D.: Social Network Sites: Public, private, or what? The Knowledge Tree 13 (2007), http://kt.flexiblelearning.net.au/tkt2007/?page_id=28
  14. 14.
    Manovich, L.: Il linguaggio dei nuovi media. MCF Edizioni Olivares, Milano (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boyd, D.: Taken out of context. American teen sociality in networked publics. PhD dissertation, University of California Berkeley (2008), http://www.danah.org/papers/TakenOutOfContext.pdf
  16. 16.
    Meyrowitz, J.: Oltre il senso del luogo: come i media elettronici influenzano il comportamento sociale. Baskerville, Bologna (1985)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nissenbaum, H.: Privacy as contextual integrity. Washington Law Review 79(1), 119–158 (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goffman, E.: The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday Anchor Books, New York (1959)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Beardsley, E.: Privacy: Autonomy and selective disclosure. In: Pennock, J.R., Chapman, J.W. (eds.) Nomos XIII: Privacy, pp. 56–70. Atherton Press, New York (1971)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grimmelmann, J.: Saving Facebook. Iowa Law Review 94, 1137–1206 (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Foucault, M.: Sorvegliare e punire. Nascita della prigione. Einaudi, Torino (1976)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bentham, J.: Panopticon ovvero la casa d’ispezione. Marsilio, Venezia (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lange, P.: Publicly private and privately public: social networking on YouTube. J. of Comp-Med. Comm. 13(1), 361–380 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sheehan, K.B.: Toward a typology of internet users and online privacy concerns. The Inf. Soc. 19(1), 21–32 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., Christakis, N.: The Taste for Privacy: an analysis of college student privacy settings in an online social network. J. Comp-Med. Comm. 14(1), 79–100 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    OECD: Participative Web and user-created content Web 2.0, wikis and social networking. SourceOECD, 15(2007), i – 128 (2007)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rouvroy, A.: Privacy, Data Protection, and the Unprecedented Challenges of Ambient Intelligence. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology, 2(1), art. 3 (2008)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Marvasti, A.: Qualitative Research in Sociology. Sage Publications, London (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Given, L.M.: The SAGE Encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Sage Publications, London (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Codeluppi, V.: La vetrinizzazione sociale: il processo di spettacolarizzazione degli individui e della società. Bollati Boringhieri, Torino (2007)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Goodings, L., Locke, A., Brown, S.D.: Social networking technology: place and identity in mediated communities. J. Comm. & Appl. Soc. Psychol. 17(6), 463–476 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manuela Farinosi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Economy, Society and TerritoryUniversity of UdineUdineItaly

Personalised recommendations