Advertisement

Interviewers’ Use of Coercive Questioning during a Midterm Period Favorable to the Opposition Party

  • Angiola Di Conza
  • Augusto Gnisci
  • Angelo Caputo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6456)

Abstract

Journalism is generally expected to be objective and neutral—not influenced by political power. Conversely, Italian televised journalism often appears influenced by the distribution of political power. The current study investigates the impact of political changes in Italy on journalistic questioning techniques. Using new software with multimodal and interactive characteristics (Si.Co.D.), we examined the interrogation styles of two interviewers (Vespa and Ferrara), one (Vespa) working for a public television channel (Rai2) and the other (Ferrara) for a private television channel (La7). Specifically, we compared the level of coercion used by these interviewers when questioning politicians from both the center-right and center-left, before and after two elections (2004 European and 2005 Regional elections) that were favorable to the opposition (at the time, center-left). Results showed that the interviewers became more coercive toward the winning coalition (center-left) but in different ways: Vespa reduced his coerciveness toward the governing wing, whereas Ferrara increased his coerciveness toward the opposition. Results are discussed with attention to the political implications of this journalistic bias.

Keywords

Political journalism Electoral context Televised interviews Si.Co.D software 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gnisci, A., Bonaiuto, M.: Grilling politicians: Politicians’ answers to questions in television interviews and legal examinations. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 22, 384–413 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bull, P.: Slipperiness, evasion, and ambiguity. Equivocation and facework in non committal political discourse. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 27, 333–344 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gnisci, A.: Coercive and Face-Threatening Questions to Left-Wing and Right-Wing Politicians During Two Italian Broadcasts: Conversational Indexes of Par Conditio for Democracy Systems. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 38, 1179–1210 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ignazi, P.: Italy. Eur. J. Polit. Res 44, 1063–1070 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ignazi, P.: Italy. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 45, 1143–1151 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bull, P., Elliott, J.: Level of threat: Means of assessing interviewer toughness and neutrality. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 17, 220–244 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Danet, B., Hoffman, K.B., Kermish, N., Rafn, H.J., Stayman, D.G.: An ethnography of questioning in the courtroom. In: Shuy, R.W., Shnukal, A. (eds.) Language use and the uses of language, pp. 222–234. Georgetown University Press, Washington (1976)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harris, S.: Interviewers’ questions in broadcast interviews. Belfast Working Papers in Language and Linguistics 8, 50–85 (1986)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Woodbury, H.: The strategic use of questions in court. Semiotica 48, 197–228 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angiola Di Conza
    • 1
  • Augusto Gnisci
    • 1
  • Angelo Caputo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologySecond University of NaplesCasertaItaly

Personalised recommendations