Skip to main content

Indifferentiable Security Reconsidered: Role of Scheduling

  • Conference paper
Information Security (ISC 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 6531))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, the substitutability of the indifferentiability framework with non-sequential scheduling is examined by reformulating the framework through applying the Task-PIOA framework, which provides non-sequential activation with oblivious task sequences. First, the indifferentiability framework with non-sequential scheduling is shown to be able to retain the substitutability. Next, this framework is shown to be closely related to reducibility of systems. Finally, two modelings with respectively sequential scheduling and non-sequential scheduling are shown to be mutually independent. Thus, the importance of scheduling in the indifferentiability framework is clarified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Maurer, U.M., Renner, R., Holenstein, C.: Indifferentiability, Impossibility Results on Reductions, and Applications to the Random Oracle Methodology. In: Naor, M. (ed.) TCC 2004. LNCS, vol. 2951, pp. 21–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Canetti, R.: Universally Composable Security: A New Paradigm for Cryptographic Protocols. In: FOCS 2001, pp. 136–145 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Backes, M., Pfitzmann, B., Waidner, M.: The Reactive Simulatability (RSIM) Framework for Asynchronous Systems. Inf. Comput. 205(12), 1685–1720 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Datta, A., Küsters, R., Mitchell, J.C., Ramanathan, A.: On the Relationships between Notions of Simulation-Based Security. J. Cryptology 21(4), 492–546 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Canetti, R., Cheung, L., Kaynar, D.K., Liskov, M., Lynch, N.A., Pereira, O., Segala, R.: Analyzing Security Protocols Using Time-Bounded Task-PIOAs. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems 18(1), 111–159 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Mitchell, J.C., Ramanathan, A., Scedrov, A., Teague, V.: A probabilistic polynomial-time process calculus for the analysis of cryptographic protocols. Theor. Comput. Sci. 353, 118–164 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Canetti, R., Cheung, L., Lynch, N.A., Pereira, O.: On the Role of Scheduling in Simulation-Based Security. In: WITS 2007, pp. 22–37 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nagao, W., Manabe, Y., Okamoto, T.: Relationship of Three Cryptographic Channels in the UC Framework. In: Baek, J., Bao, F., Chen, K., Lai, X. (eds.) ProvSec 2008. LNCS, vol. 5324, pp. 268–282. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Delaune, S., Kremer, S., Pereira, O.: Simulation based security in the applied pi calculus. In: FSTTCS 2009, pp. 169–180 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Canetti, R., Goldreich, O., Halevi, S.: The Random Oracle Methodology, Revisited (Preliminary Version). In: STOC 1998, pp. 131–140 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yoneyama, K. (2011). Indifferentiable Security Reconsidered: Role of Scheduling. In: Burmester, M., Tsudik, G., Magliveras, S., Ilić, I. (eds) Information Security. ISC 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6531. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18178-8_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18178-8_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-18177-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18178-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics