Skip to main content

Governmental Discrimination Between Sectors: The Case of Australian Water Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sectors Matter!
  • 481 Accesses

Abstract

This manuscript raises important questions about the way economists conceptualise the interaction between economic agents. It was noted earlier by Händeler that “all branches of the economy are linked, each one is directly or indirectly a sales market for the other”. However, the thesis presented in his chapter is that aggregate measures of these interactions count for little.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is not to contend that the original distribution of rights (and thus rents) counts for little in politico-economic terms, as implied by some interpretations of Coase.

  2. 2.

    Temptations to make global predictions about the role of government specifically in irrigation and in agriculture generally need to be resisted at this point. In economies like Australia with well developed market institutions the case for government intrusion in farmer decisions is likely to be weak. Similar conditions cannot be assumed of all nations.

  3. 3.

    At the time of writing the Australian Dollar ($A) was equivalent to about $US 0.9.

  4. 4.

    This is perhaps illustrative of claims made elsewhere in this manuscript that defining a “sector” is no easy task.

  5. 5.

    There were serious flaws with even the initial first round estimates (see Productivity Commission 2010).

References

  • ABS (2008) Water and the Murray–Darling basin – a statistical profile, 2000–01 to 2005–06. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper B (2009) The social cost of urban water restrictions and related enforcement regimes. AARES (NZ branch) conference, Auckland

    Google Scholar 

  • Crase L (2010) The spin and economics of irrigation infrastructure policy in Australia. Aust Q 82(2):12–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Crase L, O’Keefe S (2009) The paradox of national water savings. Agenda 16(1):45–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for International Economics (2008) Updated estimates of the cost of water restrictions in the ACT region. Centre for International Economics, Canberra, Prepared for ACTEW Corporation, September

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson B (1969) Australia wet or dry? The physical and economic limits to the expansion of agriculture. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment, Heritage, Water and the Arts (2009) Water policy and programs. http://www.environment.gov.au/water/policy-programs/index.html. Retrieved 1 Mar 2009

  • Grafton Q, Ward M (2008) Prices versus rationing: Marshallian surplus and mandatory water restrictions. Econ Rec 84:s57–s65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard J (2007) A national plan for water security. Department of the Prime Minister, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee L, Ancev T (2009) Two decades of Murray–Darling water management: a river of funding, a trickle of achievement. Agenda 16(1):5–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Letcher R, Powell S (2008) The hydrological setting. In: Crase L (ed) Water policy in Australia: the impact of change and uncertainty. Resources for the future, Washington, DC, pp 17–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave W (2008) Historical development of water resources in Australia: irrigation policy in the Murray–Darling basin. In: Crase L (ed) Water policy in Australia: the impact of change and uncertainty. Resources for the future, Washington, DC, pp 28–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry C (2009) Pricing savings, valuing losses and measuring costs: do we really know how to talk about improved water management? In: Albiac J, Dinar A (eds) The management of water quality and irrigation technologies. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission (2010) Market mechanisms for recovering water in the Murray–Darling basin: final research report. Productivity Commission, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • RMCG (2009) Socio-economic impacts: closure of Wakool irrigation district (or parts thereof). http://wakool.local-e.nsw.gov.au/files/353401/File/SocioEconomicImpactsWakoolShire09.pdf. Retrieved 19 Dec 2009

  • Smith D (1998) Water in Australia: resources and management. Oxford University Press, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2003) Survey: liquid assets. Economist 368:13

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin Crase .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crase, L., O’Keefe, S. (2011). Governmental Discrimination Between Sectors: The Case of Australian Water Policy. In: Mann, S. (eds) Sectors Matter!. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18126-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18126-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-18125-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18126-9

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics