Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fundamental Consideration

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fractal Analysis in Machining

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology ((BRIEFSCOMPUTAT,volume 3))

  • 1183 Accesses

Abstract

The importance and usefulness of fractal dimension in describing surface roughness over the conventional roughness parameters are presented in this chapter. The fundamental of fractal dimension and the methodology for evaluation of fractal dimension are also discussed. Literature survey is carried out for four different types of machining processes and shows that there is scarcity of literatures which deal with fractal description of surface roughness. Fundamentals of design of experiments and response surface methodology are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abburi NR, Dixit US (2006) A knowledge-based system for the prediction of surface roughness in turning process. Robotics Comput-Integr Manuf 22:363–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abouelatta OB, Madl J (2001) Surface roughness prediction based on cutting parameters and tool vibrations in turning operations. J Mater Process Technol 118:269–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alauddin M, El Baradie MA, Hashmi MSJ (1996) Optimization of surface finish in end milling Inconel 718. J Mater Process Technol 56:54–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amorima FL, Weingaertner WL (2005) The influence of generator actuation mode and process parameters on the performance of finish EDM of a tool steel. J Mater Process Technol 166:411–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbizu IP, Pérez CJL (2003) Surface roughness prediction by factorial design of experiments in turning processes. J Mater Process Technol 143–144:390–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assarzadeh S, Ghoreishi M (2008) Neural-network-based modeling and optimization of the electro-discharge machining process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39:488–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagci E, Aykut S (2006) A study of Taguchi optimization method for identifying optimum surface roughness in CNC face milling of cobalt-based alloy (stellite 6). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 29:940–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagci E, Isik B (2006) Investigation of surface roughness in turning unidirectional GFRP composites by using RS methodology and ANN. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 31:10–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balic J, Korosec M (2002) Intelligent tool path generation for milling of free surfaces using neural networks. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42:1171–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benardos PG, Vosniakos GC (2002) Prediction of surface roughness in CNC face milling using neural networks and Taguchi’s design of experiments. Robotics Comput-Integr Manuf 18:343–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benardos PG, Vosniakos GC (2003) Predicting surface roughness in machining: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(8):833–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berglund J, Rose’n BG (2009) A method development for correlation of surface finish appearance of die surfaces and roughness measurement data. Tribol Lett 36(2):157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry MV, Lewis ZV (1980) On the Weierstrass-Mandelbrot fractal function. Proc R Soc A 370:459–484

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bhushan B, Wyant JC, Meiling J (1988) A new three-dimensional non-contact digital optical profiler. Wear 122:301–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigerelle M, Najjar D, Iost A (2005) Multiscale functional analysis of wear a fractal model of the grinding process. Wear 258:232–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown CA, Savary G (1991) Describing ground surface texture using contact profilometry and fractal analysis. Wear 141:211–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang CK, Lu HS (2007) Design optimization of cutting parameters for side milling operations with multiple performance characteristics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32:18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavoshi SZ, Tajdari M (2010) Surface roughness modelling in hard turning operation of AISI 4140 using CBN cutting tool. Int J Mater Form. doi:10.1007/s12289-009-0679-2

  • Choi TJ, Subrahmanya N, Li H, Shin YC (2008) Generalized practical models of cylindrical plunge grinding processes. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabnun MA, Hashmi MSJ, El-Baradie MA (2005) Surface roughness prediction model by design of experiments for turning machinable glass-ceramic (Macor). J Mater Process Technol 164–165:1289–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davim JP (2001) A note on the determination of optimal cutting conditions for surface finish obtained in turning using design of experiments. J Mater Process Technol 116:305–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Sonbaty IA, Khashaba UA, Selmy AI, Ali AI (2008) Prediction of surface roughness profiles for milledsurfaces using an artificial neural network and fractal geometry approach. J Mater Process Technol 200:271–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng CX, Wang XF (2003) Surface roughness predictive modeling: neural networks versus regression. IIE Trans 35:11–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng CXJ, Yu ZG, Kusiak A (2006) Selection and validation of predictive regression and neural network models based on designed experiments. IIE Trans 38:13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredj NB, Amamou R (2006) Ground surface roughness prediction based upon experimental design and neural network models. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 31:24–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuh KH, Wu CF (1995) A proposed statistical model for surface quality prediction in end-milling of Al alloy. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 35(S):1187–1200

    Google Scholar 

  • Ge S, Chen G (1999) Fractal prediction models of sliding wear during the running–in process. Wear 231:249–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghani JA, Choudhury IA, Hassan HH (2004) Application of Taguchi method in the optimization of end milling parameters. J Mater Process Technol 145:84–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grzesik W (1996) A revised model for predicting surface roughness in turning. Wear 194:143–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta AK (2010) Predictive modelling of turning operations using response surface methodology, artificial neural networks and support vector regression. Int J Prod Res 48(3):763–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han JH, Ping S, Shengsun H (2005) Fractal characterization and simulation of surface profiles of copper electrodes and aluminum sheets. Mater Sci Eng A 403:174–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasegawa M, Liu J, Okuda K, Nunobiki M (1996) Calculation of the fractal dimensions of machined surface profiles. Wear 192:40–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassui A, Diniz AE (2003) Correlating surface roughness and vibration on plunge cylindrical grinding of steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43:855–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He L, Zhu J (1997) The fractal character of processed metal surfaces. Wear 208:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecker RL, Liang SY (2003) Predictive model of surface roughness in grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43:755–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO 4287:1997 (1997) Geometrical product specification (GPS)—surface texture: profile method—terms, definitions and surface texture parameters. International Organization of Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahn R, Truckenbrodt H (2004) A simple fractal analysis method of the surface roughness. J Mater Process Technol 145:40–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jesuthanam CP, Kumanan S, Asokan P (2007) Surface roughness prediction using hybrid neural networks. Mach Sci Technol 11:271–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Z, Wang H, Fei B (2001) Research into the application of fractal geometry in characterizing machined surfaces. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:2179–2185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao Y, Lei S, Pei ZJ, Lee ES (2004) Fuzzy adaptive networks in machining process modeling: surface roughness prediction for turning operations. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:1643–1651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang MC, Kim JS, Kim KH (2005) Fractal dimension analysis of machined surface depending on coated tool wear. Surf Coat Technol 193(1–3):259–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karayel D (2009) Prediction and control of surface roughness in CNC lathe using artificial neural network. J Mater Process Technol 209:3125–3137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keskin YH, Halkacı HS, Kizil SM (2006) An experimental study for determination of the effects of machining parameters on surface roughness in electrical discharge machining (EDM). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28:1118–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby ED, Zhang Z, Chen JC, Chen J (2006) Optimizing surface finish in a turning operation using the Taguchi parameter design method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 30:1021–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli A, Dixit US (2005) A neural-network-based methodology for the prediction of surface roughness in turning process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25:118–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krajnik P, Kopac J, Sluga A (2005) Design of grinding factors based on response surface methodology. J Mater Process Technol 162–163:629–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwak JS (2005) Application of Taguchi and response surface methodologies for geometric error in surface grinding process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:327–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwak JS, Sim SB, Jeong YD (2006) An analysis of grinding power and surface roughness in external cylindrical grinding of hardened SCM440 steel using response surface method. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:304–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SH, Li XP (2001) Study of the effect of machining parameters on the machining characteristics in electrical discharge machining of tungsten carbide. J Mater Process Technol 115:344–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KY, Kang MC, Jeong YH, Lee DW, Kim JS (2001) Simulation of surface roughness and profile in high-speed end milling. J Mater Process Technol 113:410–4125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin TR (2002) Optimisation technique for face milling stainless steel with multiple performance characteristics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 19:330–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin JL, Lin CL (2002) The use of orthogonal array with grey relational analysis to optimize the electrical discharge machining process with multiple performance characteristics. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42:237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin JL, Lin CL (2005) The use of grey-fuzzy logic for the optimization of the manufacturing process. J Mater Process Technol 160:9–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin WS, Lee BY, Wu CL (2001) Modeling the surface roughness and cutting force for turning. J Mater Process Technol 108:286–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling FF (1990) Fractals, engineering surfaces and tribology. Wear 136:141–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lou MS, Chen JC, Li CM (1998) Surface roughness prediction technique for CNC end-milling. J Ind Technol 15 (1), November 1998 to January 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar A, Bhushan B (1990) Role of fractal geometry in roughness characterization and contact mechanics of surfaces. Trans ASME J Tribol 112:205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar A, Tien CL (1990) Fractal characterization and simulation of rough surfaces. Wear 136:313–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maksoud TMA, Atia MR, Koura MM (2003) Applications of artificial intelligence to grinding operations via neural networks. Mach Sci Technol 7(3):361–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal D, Pal SK, Saha P (2007) Modeling of electrical discharge machining process using back propagation neural network and multi-objective optimization using non-dominating sorting algorithm-II. J Mater Process Technol 186:154–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot BB (1967) How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension. Science 156:636–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot BB (1982) The fractal geometry of nature. W H freeman, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mansour A, Abdalla H (2002) Surface roughness model for end milling: a semi-free cutting carbon casehardening steel (EN32) in dry condition. J Mater Process Technol 124:183–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minitab User Manual Release 13.2 (2001) Making data analysis easier. MINITAB Inc. State College, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanasundararaju N, Sivasubramanian R, Gnanaguru R, Alagumurthy N (2008) A neural network and fuzzy-based methodology for the prediction of work roll surface roughness in a grinding process. Int J Comput Methods Eng Sci Mech 9:103–110

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DC (2001) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthukrishnan N, Davim JP (2009) Optimization of machining parameters of Al/SiC-MMC with ANOVA and ANN analysis. J Mater Process Technol 209:225–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nalbant M, Gokkaya H, Sur G (2007) Application of Taguchi method in the optimization of cutting parameters for surface roughness in turning. Mater Des 28:1379–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayak PR (1971) Random process model of rough surfaces. Trans ASME J Lubr Technol 93:398–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öktem H (2009) An integrated study of surface roughness for modeling and optimization of cutting parameters during end milling operation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43:852–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oktem H, Erzurumlu T, Kurtaran H (2005) Application of response surface methodology in the optimization of cutting conditions for surface roughness. J Mater Process Technol 170:11–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal SK, Chakraborty D (2005) Surface roughness prediction in turning using artificial neural network. Neural Comput Appl 14:319–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palanikumar K (2008) Application of Taguchi and response surface methodologies for surface roughness in machining glass fiber reinforced plastics by PCD tooling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 36:19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palanikumar K, Karunamoorthy L, Karthikeyan R (2006) Parametric optimization to minimise the surface roughness on the machining of GFRP composites. J Mater Sci Technol 22(1):66–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Petropoulos G, Vaxevanidis NM, Pandazaras C (2004) Modeling of surface finish in electro-discharge machining based upon statistical multi-parameter analysis. J Mater Process Technol 155–156:1247–1251

    Google Scholar 

  • Puertas I, Luis CJ (2003) A study on the machining parameters optimisation of electrical discharge machining. J Mater Process Technol 143–144:521–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puertas I, Luis CJ, Álvarez L (2004) Analysis of the influence of EDM parameters on surface quality, MRR and EW of WC-Co. J Mater Process Technol 153–154:1026–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puertas I, Luis CJ, Villa G (2005) Spacing roughness parameters study on the EDM of silicon carbide. J Mater Process Technol 164–165:1590–1596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishnan R, Karunamoorthy L (2006) Multi response optimization of wire EDM operations using robust design of experiments. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 29:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramasawmy H, Blunt L (2002) 3D surface characterisation of elctropolished EDMed surface and quantitative assessment of process variables using Taguchi Methodology. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42:1129–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramasawmy H, Blunt L (2004) Effect of EDM process parameters on 3D surface topography. J Mater Process Technol 148:155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh S, Karunamoorthy L, Palanikumar K (2008) Surface roughness analysis in machining of titanium alloy. Mater Manuf Process 23:174–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy NSK, Rao PV (2005) Selection of optimum tool geometry and cutting conditions using a surface roughness prediction model for end milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26:1202–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy NSK, Rao PV (2006a) Experimental investigation to study the effect of solid lubricants on cutting forces and surface quality in end milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:189–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy NSK, Rao PV (2006b) Selection of an optimal parametric combination for achieving a better surface finish in dry milling using genetic algorithms. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28:463–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Routara BC, Bandyopadhyay A, Sahoo P (2009) Roughness modeling and optimization in CNC end milling using response surface method: effect of workpiece material variation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 40:1166–1180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahin Y, Motorcu AR (2005) Surface roughness model for machining mild steel with coated carbide tool. Mater Des 26:321–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo P (2005) Engineering tribology. Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo P, Ghosh N (2007) Finite element contact analysis of fractal surfaces. J Phys D Appl Phys 40:4245–4252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo P, Routara BC, Bandyopadhyay A (2009) Roughness modeling and optimization in EDM using response surface method for different workpiece materials. Int J Mach Mach Mater 5(2–3):321–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar S, Mitra S, Bhattacharyya B (2006) Parametric optimisation of wire electrical discharge machining of γ titanium aluminide alloy through an artificial neural network model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27:501–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayles RS, Thomas TR (1978) Surface topography as a non-stationary random process. Nature 271:431–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah A, Mufti NA, Rakwal D, Bamberg E (2010) Material removal rate, kerf, and surface roughness of tungsten carbide machined with wire electrical discharge machining. J Mater Eng Perform. doi:10.1007/s11665-010-9644-y

  • Siddiquee AN, Khan ZA, Mallick Z (2010) Grey relational analysis coupled with principal component analysis for optimisation design of the process parameters in in-feed centreless cylindrical grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 46:983–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh D, Rao PV (2007) A surface roughness prediction model for hard turning process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32:1115–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spedding TA, Wang ZQ (1997) Parametric optimization and surface characterization of wire electrical discharge machining process. Precis Eng 20:5–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suresh PVS, Rao PV, Deshmukh SG (2002) A genetic algorithm approach for optimization of surface roughness prediction model. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42:675–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas TR (1982) Defining the microtopography of surfaces in thermal contact. Wear 79:73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tricot C, Ferlans P, Baran G (1994) Fractal analysis of worn surfaces. Wear 172:127–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai KM, Wang PJ (2001) Predictions on surface finish in electrical discharge machining based upon neural network models. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:1385–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai YH, Chen JC, Lou SJ (1999) An in-process surface recognition system based on neural networks in end milling cutting operations. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 39:583–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh K, Bobji MS, Biswas SK (1998) Some features of surface topographical power spectra generated by conventional machining of a ductile metal. Mater Sci Eng A A252:153–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh K, Bobji MS, Gargi R, Biswas SK (1999) Genesis of workpiece roughness generated in surface grinding and polishing of metals. Wear 225–229:215–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang MY, Chang HY (2004) Experimental study of surface roughness in slot end milling AL2014–T6. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:51–57

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse DJ (1982) The parameter rash, is there a cure? Wear 83:75–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan W, Komvopoulos K (1998) Contact analysis of elastic-plastic fractal surfaces. J Appl Phys 84(7):3617–3624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang JL, Chen JC (2001) A systematic approach for identifying optimum surface roughness performance in end-milling operations. J Ind Technol 17, 2 February 2001 to April 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang WH, Tarng YS (1998) Design optimization of cutting parameters for turning operations based on the Taguchi method. J Mater Process Technol 84:122–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yih-fong T, Fu-chen C (2003) A simple approach for robust design of high-speed electrical discharge machining technology. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43:217–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zain AM, Haron H, Sharif S (2010a) Application of GA to optimize cutting conditions for minimizing surface roughness in end milling machining process. Expert Syst Appl 37:4650–4659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zain AM, Haron H, Sharif S (2010b) Prediction of surface roughness in the end milling machining using artificial neural network. Expert Syst Appl 37:1755–1768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JZ, Chen JC (2007) The development of an in-process surface roughness adaptive control system in end milling operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 31:877–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JH, Lee TC, Lau WS (1997) Study on the electro-discharge machining of a hot pressed aluminum oxide based ceramic. J Mater Process Technol 63:908–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Luo Y, Wang JF, Li Z (2001) Research on the fractal of surface topography of grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:2045–2049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong ZW, Khoo LP, Han ST (2006) Prediction of surface roughness of turned surfaces using neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28:688–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong ZW, Khoo LP, Han ST (2008) Neural-network predicting of surface finish or cutting parameters for carbide and diamond turning processes. Mater Manuf Process 23:92–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X, Xi F (2002) Modeling and predicting surface roughness of the grinding process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42:969–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H, Ge S, Huang X, Zhang D, Liu J (2003) Experimental study on the characterization of worn surface topography with characteristic roughness parameter. Wear 255:309–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, 700032, India

    Prasanta Sahoo & Tapan Barman

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Campus Universitário de Santiago, University of Aveiro, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal

    João Paulo Davim

Authors
  1. Prasanta Sahoo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tapan Barman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. João Paulo Davim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prasanta Sahoo .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Prasanta Sahoo

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sahoo, P., Barman, T., Davim, J.P. (2011). Fundamental Consideration. In: Fractal Analysis in Machining. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology(), vol 3. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17922-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17922-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17921-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17922-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation