Skip to main content

A Testbed for Validation and Assessment of Frame Switching Networks

  • Conference paper
Testbeds and Research Infrastructures. Development of Networks and Communities (TridentCom 2010)

Abstract

Packet assembly at the network edge is one solution to reduce high packet rates in core network switches. Literature discusses this topic controversially because of three reasons: (1) potential negative impact of packet assembly on the traffic characteristics, (2) disruptive integration into existing networks and (3) lack of support of packet assembly in existing control plane environment.

In this paper, we introduce our testbed with 10 Gbps packet assembly nodes at the network edge and a GMPLS (Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching) control plane for its management. Our testbed integrates transparently in existing Ethernet based networks and allows comprehensive studies on the impact of packet assembly on the traffic characteristics by measurements. Beside feasibility, for early findings, we setup a measurement scenario and quantified the impact of packet assembly in terms of packet latency. For realistic traffic conditions, we found that the additional delays and jitter introduced by the assembly process are negligible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allman, M., Paxson, V., Stevens, W.: TCP Congestion Control. RFC 2581, IETF (April 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bell, E., Smith, A., Langille, P., Rijhsinghani, A., McCloghrie, K.: Definitions ofManaged Objects for Bridges with Traffic Classes, Multicast Filtering and Virtual LAN Extensions. RFC 2674, IETF (August 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blake, S., Black, D., Carlson, M., Davies, E., Wang, Z., W.Weiss.: An Architecture for Differentiated Service. RFC 2475, IETF (December 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Case, J.D., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M.L., Davin, J.: Simple Network ManagementProtocol (SNMP). RFC 1098, IETF (April 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Farrel, A., Vasseur, J.-P., Ash, J.: A Path Computation Element (PCE)-Based Architecture. RFC 4655, IETF (August 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. IEEE Computer Society. 802.1D: IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks–Media Access Control (MAC) Bridges (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. IEEE Computer Society. 802.1Q: IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks–Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. IEEE Computer Society. 802.3: IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks–Carrier sense multiple access with collision detection (CSMA/CD) access method and physical layer specifications (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. IEEE Computer Society. 802.1ad: IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks–Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks, Amendment 4: Provider Bridges (May 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. IEEE Computer Society. 802.1ah: Draft Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks–Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks, Amendment 6: Provider Backbone Bridges (November 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. IEEE Computer Society. P802.3ba: IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks–Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection (CSMA/CD) Access Method and Physical Layer Specifications - Amendment: Media Access Control Parameters, Physical Layers and Management Parameters for40 Gb/s and 100 Gb/s Operation (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. ITU-T. Framework of Optical Transport Network Recommendations. Rec.G.871/Y.1301, ITU-T (October 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. ITU-T. Functional architecture of connectionless layer networks. Rec. G.809, ITU-T (March 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. ITU-T. Generic framing procedure (GFP). Rec. G.7041/Y.1303, ITU-T (August 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kornaros, G., Lautenschlaeger, W., Sund, M., Leligou, H.-C.: Architecture and implementation of a frame aggregation unit for optical frame-based switching. In: International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications 2008, vol. 642, pp. 639–642 (September 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kögel, J., Hauger, S., Junghans, S., Köhn, M., Necker, M.C., Stanchina, S.: Designand Evaluation of a Burst Assembly Unit for Optical Burst Switching on a Network Processor. In: EUNICE 2005: Networks and Applications Towards a Ubiquitously Connected World (July 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lautenschläger, W., Frohberg, W.: Bandwidth Dimensioning in Packet-based Aggregation Networks. In: 13th International Telecommunications Network Strategy and Planning Symposium, Networks2008, Budapest (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lehman, T., Sobieski, J., Jabbari, B.: Dragon: a framework for service provision-ing in heterogeneous grid networks. IEEE Communications Magazine 44(3), 84–90 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leligou, H.C., et al.: Hybrid burst/packet switching architectures from IP NOBEL. In: Dingel, B.B., et al. (eds.) Optical Transmission Systems and Equipment for Networking, vol. 6388, p. 63880C. SPIE, San Jose(2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Malis, A.G., Hsiao, T.: Protocol Extension for Support of Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) Service Class-aware Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering. RFC 3496, IETF (March 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Masetti, F., et al.: Design and implementation of a multi-terabit opticalburst/packet router prototype. In: Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exhibit, pp. FD1-1–FD1-3 (March 17-22, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Munoz, R., Pinart, C., Martinez, R., Sorribes, J., Junyent, G., Amrani, A.: The ADRENALINE testbed: integrating GMPLS, XML, and SNMP in transparent DWDM networks. IEEE Communications Magazine 43(8), s40–s48 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mutter, A., Köhn, M., Sund, M.: A generic 10 Gbps assemblyedge node and testbed for frame switching networks. In: Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures for the Development of Networks and Communities, TridentCom 2009 (2009) (page accepted for publication)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nejabati, R., Klonidis, D., Simeonidou, D., O’Mahony, M.: Demonstration of user-controlled network interface for subwavelength bandwidth-on-demand services. In: Optical Fiber Communication Conference, vol. 3 (March 6-11, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Optical Internetworking Forum (OIF). User network interface (uni) 1.0 signaling specification (oif-uni-01.0) (October 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pedroso, P., et al.: An interoperable GMPLS/OBS control plane: RSVP and OSPF extensions proposal. In: CNSDSP 2008, pp. 418–422 (July 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Plummer, D.: Ethernet Address Resolution Protocol: Or Converting Network Protocol Addresses to 48.bit Ethernet Address for Transmission on Ethernet Hardware. RFC 826, IETF (November 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Postel, J.: Internet Protocol. RFC 791, IETF (September 1981)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rajaduray, R., Ovadia, S., Blumenthal, D.J.: Analysis of an edge router for span-constrained optical burst switched (obs) networks. Journal of Lightwave Technology 22(11), 26–93 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Architecture. RFC 3945, IETF (October 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  31. OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GM- PLS). RFC 4203, IETF (October 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sun, Y., Hashiguchi, T., Minh, V.Q., Wang, X., Morikawa, H., Aoyama, T.: Design and implementation of an optical burst-switched network testbed. IEEE Communications Magazine 43(11), S48–S55 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Swallow, G., Drake, J., Ishimatsu, H., Rekhter, Y.: Generalized MultiprotocolLabel Switching (GMPLS) User-Network Interface (UNI): Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) Support for the Overlay Model. RFC 4208, IETF (October 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yang, X.: Network Aware Resource Broker (NARB) Design and User Manual. Technical Report, University of Southern California (USC), Information Sciences Institute (ISI) (June 2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mutter, A., Gunreben, S., Lautenschläger, W., Köhn, M. (2011). A Testbed for Validation and Assessment of Frame Switching Networks. In: Magedanz, T., Gavras, A., Thanh, N.H., Chase, J.S. (eds) Testbeds and Research Infrastructures. Development of Networks and Communities. TridentCom 2010. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 46. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17851-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17851-1_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17850-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17851-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics