Early Algebraization pp 409-428 | Cite as

# The Algebraic Nature of Fractions: Developing Relational Thinking in Elementary School

## Abstract

The authors present a new view of the relationship between learning fractions and learning algebra that (1) emphasizes the conceptual continuities between whole-number arithmetic and fractions; and (2) shows how the fundamental properties of operations and equality that form the foundations of algebra are used naturally by children in their strategies for problems involving operating on and with fractions. This view is grounded in empirical research on how algebraic structure emerges in young children’s reasoning. Specifically, the authors argue that there is a broad class of children’s strategies for fraction problems motivated by the same mathematical relationships that are essential to understanding high-school algebra and that these relationships cannot be presented to children as discrete skills or learned as isolated rules. The authors refer to the thinking that guides such strategies as Relational thinking.

## Keywords

Elementary School Fundamental Property Concrete Material Goal Structure Algebraic Thinking## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- Baek, J. (2008). Developing algebraic thinking through explorations in multiplication. In C. E. Greenes & R. Rubenstein (Eds.),
*Seventieth Yearbook: Algebra and Algebraic Thinking in School Algebra*(pp. 141–154). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Google Scholar - Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.) (1999).
*How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School*. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Google Scholar - Brinker, L. (1997).
*Using structured representations to solve fraction problems: A discussion of seven students’ strategies*. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, March, Chicago, IL. Google Scholar - Carpenter, T. P., & Lehrer, R. (1999). Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. In E. Fennema & T. A. Romberg (Eds.),
*Mathematics Classrooms that Promote Understanding*(pp. 19–32). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar - Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Jacobs, V., Fennema, E., & Empson, S. B. (1998). A longitudinal study of invention and understanding in children’s use of multidigit addition and subtraction procedures.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*,*29*(1), 3–20. CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. (2003).
*Thinking Mathematically: Integrating Arithmetic and Algebra in the Elementary School.*Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Google Scholar - Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., & Zeringue, J. (2005). Algebra in elementary school: Developing relational thinking.
*ZDM*,*37*(1), 53–59. CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Dewey, J. (1974). The child and the curriculum. In R. Archambault (Ed.),
*John Dewey on Education: Selected Writings*(pp. 339–358). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar - Dowker, A. D. (1992). Computational estimation strategies of professional mathematicians.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*,*23*, 45–55. CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Empson, S. B. (1999). Equal sharing and shared meaning: The development of fraction concepts in a first-grade classroom.
*Cognition and Instruction*,*17*(3), 283–342. CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Empson, S. B. (2003). Low-performing students and teaching fractions for understanding: An interactional analysis.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*,*34*, 305–343. CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Empson, S. B., & Levi, L. (2011).
*Extending Children’s Mathematics: Fractions and Decimals*. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Google Scholar - Empson, S. B., & Turner, E. E. (2006). The emergence of multiplicative thinking in children’s solutions to paper folding tasks.
*Journal of Mathematical Behavior*,*25*, 46–56. CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Empson, S. B., Junk, D., Dominguez, H., & Turner, E. E. (2006). Fractions as the coordination of multiplicatively related quantities: A cross-sectional study of children’s thinking.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*,*63*, 1–28. CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Falkner, K. P., Levi, L., & Carpenter, T. P. (1999). Children’s understanding of equality: A foundation for algebra.
*Teaching Children Mathematics*,*6*, 231–236. Google Scholar - Greeno, J. G., Colliins, A. M., & Resnick, L. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.),
*Handbook of Educational Psychology*(pp. 15–46). New York: Macmillan. Google Scholar - Herstein, I. N. (1996).
*Abstract Algebra*. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Google Scholar - Hiebert, J., & Behr, M. (1988). Introduction: Capturing the major themes. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.),
*Number Concepts and Operations in the Middle Grades*(pp. 1–18). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar - Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning mathematics with understanding. In D. Grouws (Ed.),
*Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning*(pp. 65–97). New York: Macmillan. Google Scholar - Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Givvin, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, J. et al. (2003).
*Teaching mathematic in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study*(NCES 2003-013). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Google Scholar - Izsák, A. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching fraction multiplication.
*Cognition and Instruction*,*26*, 95–143. Google Scholar - Jacobs, V., Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Battey, D. (2007). Professional development focused on children’s algebraic reasoning in elementary school.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*,*38*, 258–288. Google Scholar - Kerslake, D. (1986).
*Fractions: Children’s Strategies and Errors. A Report of the Strategies and Errors in Secondary Mathematics Project*. England: NFER-Nelson Publishing Company, Ltd. Google Scholar - Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001).
*Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics*. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Google Scholar - Koehler, J. (2004).
*Learning to think relationally and using relational thinking to learn.*Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Google Scholar - Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In C. Janvier (Ed.),
*Problems of Representation in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics*(pp. 33–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar - Martin, H. T., & Schwartz, D. (2005). Physically distributed learning: Adapting and reinterpreting physical environments in the development of fractions concepts.
*Cognitive Science*,*29*, 587–625. CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Matz, M. (1982). Towards a process model for school algebra errors. In D. Sleeman & J. S. Brown (Eds.),
*Intelligent Tutoring Systems*(pp. 25–50). New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar - National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1998).
*The Nature and Role of Algebra in the K-14 Curriculum*. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Google Scholar - National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000).
*Principles and Standards for School Mathematics*. Reston, VA: Author. Google Scholar - Piaget, J., Inhelder, B., & Szeminska, A. (1960).
*The Child’s Conception of Geometry*(E. A. Lunzer, Trans.). New York: Basic. Google Scholar - Resnick, L., & Omanson, S. (1987). Learning to understand arithmetic. In R. Glaser (Ed.),
*Advances in Instructional Psychology*(Vol. 3, pp. 41–96). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar - Saxe, G., Gearhart, M., & Seltzer (1999). Relations between classroom practices and student learning in the domain of fractions.
*Cognition and Instruction*,*17*, 1–24. CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sleeman, D. H. (1984). An attempt to understand students’ understanding of basic algebra.
*Cognitive Science*,*8*, 387–412. CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Smith, J. P. (1995). Competent reasoning with rational numbers.
*Cognition and Instruction*,*13*(1), 3–50. CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sophian, C. (2007).
*The Origins of Mathematical Knowledge in Childhood*. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar - Stafylidou, S., & Vosniadou, S. (2004). The development of students’ understanding of the numerical value of fractions.
*Learning and Instruction*,*14*, 503–518. CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Streefland, L. (1993). Fractions: A realistic approach. In T. P. Carpenter, E. Fennema, & T. Romberg (Eds.),
*Rational Numbers: An Integration of Research*(pp. 289–325). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar - United States Department of Education (2008).
*The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel*. Washington, DC: Author. Google Scholar - Uttal, D. H., Scudder, K. V., & DeLoache, J. S. (1997). Manipulatives as symbols: A new perspective on the use of concrete objects to teach mathematics.
*Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology*,*18*, 37–54. CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Valentine, C., Carpenter, T. P., & Pligge, M. (2004). Developing concepts of proof in a sixth-grade classroom. In R. Nemirovsky, A. Rosebery, J. Solomon, & B. Warren (Eds.),
*Everyday Day Matters in Science and Mathematics: Studies of Complex Classroom Events*(pp. 95–118). New York: Routledge. Google Scholar - Van de Walle, J. (2007).
*Elementary and Middle School Mathematics: Teaching Developmentally*(6th ed.). Boston: Pearson. Google Scholar - Vergnaud, G. (1988). Multiplicative structures. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.),
*Number Concepts and Operations in the Middle Grades*(pp. 141–161). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar