Skip to main content

Commentary on Part II

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Advances in Mathematics Education ((AME))

Abstract

In this commentary to the chapters in the cognitive section of early algebraization, we synthesize and critically discuss common themes found in them such as components of non-formal algebraic thinking, the purported dichotomy between arithmetic and algebra; meaningful arithmetic, and generalizing ability, among others using the frameworks of William Brownell, Ernst Haeckl and Jean-Baptiste Lamarck.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bagni, G. T., Furinghetti, F., & Spagnolo, F. (2004). History and epistemology in mathematics education. In L. Cannizzaro, A. Fiori, & O. Robutti (Eds.), Italian Research in Mathematics Education 2000–2003 (pp. 170–192). Milano: Ghisetti e Corvi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balacheff, N. (2001). Symbolic arithmetic vs algebra: The core of a didactical dilemma. In R. Sutherland, T. Rojano, A. Bell, & R. Lins (Eds.), Perspectives on School Algebra (pp. 249–260). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownell, W. A. (1947). The place and meaning in the teaching of arithmetic. The Elementary School Journal, 4, 256–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callebaut, W. (1987). Why it makes sense to extend the genotyoe/phenotype distinction to culture. Problemi epistemology della biologia, 2, 65. La Nuova Critica, Nuova Serie I-II.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienes, Z. P. (1961). On abstraction and generalization. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 281–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filloy, E., Rojano, T., & Puig, L. (2008). Educational Algebra. A Theoretical and Empirical Approach. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furinghetti, F., & Radford, L. (2002). Historical conceptual developments and the teaching of mathematics: From phylogenesis and ontogenesis theory to classroom practice. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 631–654). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1979). Another look at Lamarck. New Scientist, 4, 38–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, B. (2008). Guest editorial: Reaction to the final report of the national mathematics advisory panel. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 5(2&3), 365–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, E. (1874). Anthropogenie oder Entwickelungsgeschichte des Menschen. Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaput, J. J. (1999). Teaching and learning a new algebra. In E. Fennema & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics Classrooms that Promote Understanding (pp. 133–155). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, J. (1992). A history of research in mathematics education. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 3–38). New York: NCTM: Macmillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (1992). The Discipline of Noticing. Sunrise Research Laboratory, Melbourne: RMIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., & Garcia, R. (1989). Psychogenesis and the History of Science. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman, B. (2004). Reflective abstraction, uniframes and the formulation of generalizations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(2), 205–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman, B. (2010). Commentary on theorizing in mathematics education research: Differences in modes and quality. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 15(1), 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman, B., & Kaiser, G. (2010). Series preface to advances in mathematics education. In B. Sriraman & L. English (Eds.), Theories of Mathematics Education: Seeking New Frontiers Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman, B., & Törner, G. (2008). Political union/mathematical education disunion: Building bridges in European didactic traditions. In L. English, M. Bussi, G. A. Jones, R. Lesh, B. Sriraman, & D. Tirosh (Eds.), The Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education (2nd ed.) (pp. 656–690). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, R., Rojano, T., Bell, A., & Lins, R. (Eds.) (2001). Perspectives on School Algebra. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bharath Sriraman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sriraman, B., Lee, KH. (2011). Commentary on Part II. In: Cai, J., Knuth, E. (eds) Early Algebraization. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics