Advertisement

Commentary on Part II

  • Bharath SriramanEmail author
  • Kyeong-Hwa Lee
Part of the Advances in Mathematics Education book series (AME)

Abstract

In this commentary to the chapters in the cognitive section of early algebraization, we synthesize and critically discuss common themes found in them such as components of non-formal algebraic thinking, the purported dichotomy between arithmetic and algebra; meaningful arithmetic, and generalizing ability, among others using the frameworks of William Brownell, Ernst Haeckl and Jean-Baptiste Lamarck.

Keywords

Mathematics Education Middle School Student Meaningful Arithmetic Early Grade Generalize Arithmetic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bagni, G. T., Furinghetti, F., & Spagnolo, F. (2004). History and epistemology in mathematics education. In L. Cannizzaro, A. Fiori, & O. Robutti (Eds.), Italian Research in Mathematics Education 2000–2003 (pp. 170–192). Milano: Ghisetti e Corvi. Google Scholar
  2. Balacheff, N. (2001). Symbolic arithmetic vs algebra: The core of a didactical dilemma. In R. Sutherland, T. Rojano, A. Bell, & R. Lins (Eds.), Perspectives on School Algebra (pp. 249–260). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. Google Scholar
  3. Brownell, W. A. (1947). The place and meaning in the teaching of arithmetic. The Elementary School Journal, 4, 256–265. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Callebaut, W. (1987). Why it makes sense to extend the genotyoe/phenotype distinction to culture. Problemi epistemology della biologia, 2, 65. La Nuova Critica, Nuova Serie I-II. Google Scholar
  5. Dienes, Z. P. (1961). On abstraction and generalization. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 281–301. Google Scholar
  6. Filloy, E., Rojano, T., & Puig, L. (2008). Educational Algebra. A Theoretical and Empirical Approach. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
  7. Furinghetti, F., & Radford, L. (2002). Historical conceptual developments and the teaching of mathematics: From phylogenesis and ontogenesis theory to classroom practice. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 631–654). Hillsdale: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
  8. Gould, S. J. (1979). Another look at Lamarck. New Scientist, 4, 38–40. Google Scholar
  9. Greer, B. (2008). Guest editorial: Reaction to the final report of the national mathematics advisory panel. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 5(2&3), 365–370. Google Scholar
  10. Haeckel, E. (1874). Anthropogenie oder Entwickelungsgeschichte des Menschen. Leipzig: Engelmann. Google Scholar
  11. Kaput, J. J. (1999). Teaching and learning a new algebra. In E. Fennema & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics Classrooms that Promote Understanding (pp. 133–155). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar
  12. Kilpatrick, J. (1992). A history of research in mathematics education. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 3–38). New York: NCTM: Macmillan Publishing Company. Google Scholar
  13. Mason, J. (1992). The Discipline of Noticing. Sunrise Research Laboratory, Melbourne: RMIT. Google Scholar
  14. Piaget, J., & Garcia, R. (1989). Psychogenesis and the History of Science. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar
  15. Sriraman, B. (2004). Reflective abstraction, uniframes and the formulation of generalizations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(2), 205–222. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sriraman, B. (2010). Commentary on theorizing in mathematics education research: Differences in modes and quality. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 15(1), 53–58. Google Scholar
  17. Sriraman, B., & Kaiser, G. (2010). Series preface to advances in mathematics education. In B. Sriraman & L. English (Eds.), Theories of Mathematics Education: Seeking New Frontiers Berlin: Springer. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sriraman, B., & Törner, G. (2008). Political union/mathematical education disunion: Building bridges in European didactic traditions. In L. English, M. Bussi, G. A. Jones, R. Lesh, B. Sriraman, & D. Tirosh (Eds.), The Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education (2nd ed.) (pp. 656–690). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis. Google Scholar
  19. Sutherland, R., Rojano, T., Bell, A., & Lins, R. (Eds.) (2001). Perspectives on School Algebra. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematical SciencesUniversity of MontanaMissoulaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics EducationSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations