Skip to main content

Subjective Evaluation of Image Quality Measures for White Noise Distorted Images

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 6474))

Abstract

Image Quality Assessment has diverse applications. A number of Image Quality measures are proposed, but none is proved to be true representative of human perception of image quality. We have subjectively investigated spectral distance based and human visual system based image quality measures for their effectiveness in representing the human perception for images corrupted with white noise. Each of the 160 images with various degrees of white noise is subjectively evaluated by 50 human subjects, resulting in 8000 human judgments. On the basis of evaluations, image independent human perception values are calculated. The perception values are plotted against spectral distance based and human visual system based image quality measures. The performance of quality measures is determined by graphical observations and polynomial curve fitting, resulting in best performance by Human Visual System Absolute norm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Lu, L.: Why is image quality assessment so difficult. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, vol. 4, pp. 3313–3316 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eskicioglu, A.M.: Quality measurement for monochrome compressed images in the past 25 years. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, vol. 4, pp. 1907–1910 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guo, L., Meng, Y.: What is wrong and right with MSE. In: Eighth IASTED International Conference on Signal and Image Processing, IASTED, pp. 212–215 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Miyahara, M., Kotani, K., Algazi, V.R.: Objective picture quality scale (PQS) for image coding. IEEE Transaction on Communications 9, 1215–1225 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P.: Image quality assessment: From error measurement to structural similarity. IEEE Transaction on Image Processing 13 (January 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sheikh, H.R., Sabir, M.F., Bovik, A.C.: A statistical evaluation of recent full reference image quality assessment algorithm. IEEE Transaction on Image Processing 15, 3440–3451 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Avcibas, I., Sankur, B., Sayood, K.: Statistical evaluation of image quality measures. Journal of Electronic Imaging 11, 206–223 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nill, N.B.: A visual model weighted cosine transform for image compression and quality assessment. IEEE Transactions on Communications 33(6), 551–557 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Eskicioglu, A.M., Fisher, P.S.: Image quality measures and their performance. IEEE Transactions on Communications 43(12), 2959–2965 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Avcibas, I., Sankur, B.: Statistical analysis of image quality measures. In: European Signal Processing Conf. EUSIPCO 2000, Tampere, Finland, pp. 2181–2184 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nill, N.B., Bouzas, B.H.: Objective image quality measures derived from digital image power spectra. Optical Engineering 31(4), 813–825 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lohmann, A.W., Mendelovic, D., Shabtay, G.: Significance of phase and amplitude in the Fourier domain. Journal of Optical Society of America A 14, 2901–2904 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Sheikh, H.R., Wang, Z., Cormack, L., Bovik, A.C.: Live image quality assessment database, http://www.live.ece.utrxas.edu/research/quality

  14. ITU-R Recommendation BT. 500-11, Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality for television pictures

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mansoor, A.B., Anwar, A. (2010). Subjective Evaluation of Image Quality Measures for White Noise Distorted Images. In: Blanc-Talon, J., Bone, D., Philips, W., Popescu, D., Scheunders, P. (eds) Advanced Concepts for Intelligent Vision Systems. ACIVS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6474. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17688-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17688-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17687-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17688-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics