Exploring Individual Creativity from Network Structure Perspective: Comparison of Task Force Team and R&D Team
The objectives of this paper are to empirically investigate the fact that the factors affecting individual creativity differ depending on team characteristics and the fact that its practical implications are plentiful, especially for those who are concerned with how to design team network structures with a bid to motivate individual creativity. From previous studies, this paper suggests crucial factors for facilitating individual creativity: intrinsic motivation, organizational learning culture, and network structure. To maximize practical implications, we divide team characteristics into two types: task force teams and R&D teams. A task force team is organized with a clear mission to be completed within a rather short period. In contrast, an R&D team exists for a long time with numerous projects to finish with various terms and conditions. Empirical results reveal that individual creativity in the task force team should be controlled by adjusting the organizational learning culture and degree centrality, while individual creativity in the R&D team must be administered in a way that the individual’s intrinsic motivation is stimulated and encouraged through the use of a structural hole through which external information from outside team is available.
KeywordsIndividual creativity Team characteristics Intrinsic motivation Organizational learning culture Network Structure
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Amabile, T.M.: A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior 10, 123–167 (1988)Google Scholar
- 2.Csikszentmihályi, M.: The Domain of Creativity. In: Runco, M.A., Albert, R.S. (eds.) Theories of Creativity, pp. 190–212. Sage, Newbury Park (1990)Google Scholar
- 5.Burt, R.S.: Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar
- 11.Senge, P.M.: The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, Doubleday, New York (1990)Google Scholar
- 12.Garvin, D.A.: Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review 71, 78–91 (1993)Google Scholar
- 14.Woodman, R.W., Sawyer, J.E., Griffin, R.W.: Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity. The Academy of Management Review 18, 293–321 (1993)Google Scholar
- 16.Borgatti, S.: Creating Knowledge: Network Structure and Innovation (2005), http://www.socialnetworkanalysis.com/knowledge_creation.htm