Skip to main content

Exploring Individual Creativity from Network Structure Perspective: Comparison of Task Force Team and R&D Team

  • Conference paper
U- and E-Service, Science and Technology (UNESST 2010)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 124))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The objectives of this paper are to empirically investigate the fact that the factors affecting individual creativity differ depending on team characteristics and the fact that its practical implications are plentiful, especially for those who are concerned with how to design team network structures with a bid to motivate individual creativity. From previous studies, this paper suggests crucial factors for facilitating individual creativity: intrinsic motivation, organizational learning culture, and network structure. To maximize practical implications, we divide team characteristics into two types: task force teams and R&D teams. A task force team is organized with a clear mission to be completed within a rather short period. In contrast, an R&D team exists for a long time with numerous projects to finish with various terms and conditions. Empirical results reveal that individual creativity in the task force team should be controlled by adjusting the organizational learning culture and degree centrality, while individual creativity in the R&D team must be administered in a way that the individual’s intrinsic motivation is stimulated and encouraged through the use of a structural hole through which external information from outside team is available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amabile, T.M.: A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior 10, 123–167 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Csikszentmihályi, M.: The Domain of Creativity. In: Runco, M.A., Albert, R.S. (eds.) Theories of Creativity, pp. 190–212. Sage, Newbury Park (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Borgatti, S.P., Foster, P.C.: The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology. Journal of Management 29, 991–1013 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahuja, M.K., Galletta, D.F., Carley, K.M.: Individual Centrality and Performance in Virtual R&D Groups: An Empirical Study. Management Science 49, 21–39 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burt, R.S.: Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Coleman, J.S.: Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94(supplement), 95–120 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsai, W.: Social Capital, Strategic Relatedness and the Formation of Intra-Organizational Linkages. Strategic Management Journal 21, 925–939 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Freeman, L.C.: Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks 1, 215–239 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: Intrinsic Motivation and Self Determination in Human Behavior. Plenum Press, New York (1985)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Amabile, T.M.: Managing creativity in organizations: on doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review 40, 39–58 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Senge, P.M.: The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, Doubleday, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Garvin, D.A.: Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review 71, 78–91 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Song, S., Nerur, S., Teng, J.: An Exploratory Study on the Roles of Network Structure and Knowledge Processing Operation in Work Unit Knowledge Management. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 38, 8–26 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Woodman, R.W., Sawyer, J.E., Griffin, R.W.: Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity. The Academy of Management Review 18, 293–321 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Uzzi, B.: The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review 61, 674–698 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Borgatti, S.: Creating Knowledge: Network Structure and Innovation (2005), http://www.socialnetworkanalysis.com/knowledge_creation.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lee, K.C., Chae, S.W., Seo, Y.W. (2010). Exploring Individual Creativity from Network Structure Perspective: Comparison of Task Force Team and R&D Team. In: Kim, Th., Ma, J., Fang, Wc., Park, B., Kang, BH., Ślęzak, D. (eds) U- and E-Service, Science and Technology. UNESST 2010. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 124. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17644-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17644-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17643-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17644-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics