Skip to main content

Modeling Social Structure as Network Effects: Rewards for Learning Improves Performance

  • Conference paper
Unifying Themes in Complex Systems

Abstract

A theoretical representation of social structure in agent-based organizations is developed. To test the model we generated a hypothesis from organizational learning theory and tested it using computational experiments. We found that emergent social structure associated with rewarding agent learning increased collective output over and above pay for performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Carley, K. M., & Prietula, M. J., 1994a, ACTS Theory: Extending the Model of Bounded Rationality, in Computational Organizational Theory (pp. 55–88), edited by K. M. Carley & M. J. Prietula, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (Hillsdale, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K. M., & Prietula, M. J. (Eds.), 1994b, Computational Organization Theory, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (Hillsdale, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretive Systems. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 284–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E., 1938, The rules of sociological method, Free Press (Glencoe, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A., 1984, The Constitution of Society, University of California Press (Berkeley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazy, J. K., & Tivnan, B. F., 2003, Simulating Agent Intelligence as Local Network Dynamics and Emergent Organizational Outcomes, in Proceedings of 2003 Winter Simulation Conference,edited by S. Chick, P. J. Sanchez, D. Ferrin, & D. J. Morrice, INFORMS College of Simulation (New Orleans).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazy, J. K., Tivnan, B. F., & Schwandt, D. R. (2003). The Impact of Boundary Spanning on Organizational Learning: Computational Explorations. Emergence, 5(4), 86–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H., 1995, Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity, Perseus Books (Reading).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt, D., & Carley, K. M. (1998, June). A PCANS Model Structure in Organization. Paper presented at the 1998 International Symposium on Command and Control Research and Technology, Monterrey, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, B. (1999). Complexity Theory in Organization Science: Seizing the promise of becoming a fad. Emergence, 1(1), 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., 1985, Competitive Advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance, The Free Press (New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwandt, D. R., & Marquardt, M. J., 2000, Organizational Learning: From World-class Theories to Global Best Practices, St. Lucie Press (Boca Raton).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hazy, J.K., Tivnan, B.F., Schwandt, D.R. (2011). Modeling Social Structure as Network Effects: Rewards for Learning Improves Performance. In: Minai, A.A., Braha, D., Bar-Yam, Y. (eds) Unifying Themes in Complex Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17635-7_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics