Skip to main content

Collusion in VCG Path Procurement Auctions

  • Conference paper
Internet and Network Economics (WINE 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6484))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We consider collusion in path procurement auctions, where payments are determined using the VCG mechanism. We show that collusion can increase the utility of the agents, and in some cases they can extract any amount the procurer is willing to offer. We show that computing how much a coalition can gain by colluding is NP-complete in general, but that in certain interesting restricted cases, the optimal collusion scheme can be computed in polynomial time. We examine the ways in which the colluders might share their payments, using the core and Shapley value from cooperative game theory. We show that in some cases the collusion game has an empty core, so although beneficial manipulations exist, the colluders would find it hard to form a stable coalition due to inability to decide how to split the rewards. On the other hand, we show that in several common restricted cases the collusion game is convex, so it has a non-empty core, which contains the Shapley value. We also show that in these cases colluders can compute core imputations and the Shapley value in polynomial time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Archer, A., Tardos, É.: Frugal path mechanisms. ACM Transactions on Algorithms, TALG (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aumann, R.: Acceptable points in general cooperative n-person games. In: Contributions to the Theory of Games, vol. IV, pp. 287–324 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ausubel, L.M., Milgrom, P.: The lovely but lonely vickrey auction. In: Combinatorial Auctions, ch. 1, pp. 17–40 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bachrach, Y.: Honor among thieves: Collusion in multi-unit auctions. In: AAMAS (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bachrach, Y., Elkind, E.: Divide and conquer: False-name manipulations in weighted voting games. In: AAMAS, pp. 975–982 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bachrach, Y., Elkind, E., Meir, R., Pasechnik, D., Zuckerman, M., Rothe, J., Rosenschein, J.: The cost of stability in coalitional games. In: Mavronicolas, M., Papadopoulou, V.G. (eds.) Algorithmic Game Theory. LNCS, vol. 5814, pp. 122–134. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Bachrach, Y., Markakis, E., Resnick, E., Procaccia, A., Rosenschein, J., Saberi, A.: Approximating power indices: theoretical and empirical analysis. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 20(2), 105–122 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bachrach, Y., Rosenschein, J.S.: Computing the Banzhaf power index in network flow games. In: AAMAS, Honolulu, Hawaii, pp. 323–329 (May 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, C., Tauman, Y.: Collusion in one-shot second-price auctions. Economic Theory 28, 145–172 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Clarke, E.H.: Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice 11(1), 17–33 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Day, R., Milgrom, P.: Core-selecting package auctions. International Journal of Game Theory 36(3), 393–407 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Gillies, D.B.: Some theorems on n-person games (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Groves, T.: Incentives in teams. Econometrica 41, 617–663 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Leyton-Brown, K., Shoham, Y., Tennenholtz, M.: Bidding clubs: institutionalized collusion in auctions. In: ACM EC (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Leyton-Brown, K., Shoham, Y., Tennenholtz, M.: Bidding clubs in first-price auctions. In: AAAI (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Matsui, Y., Matsui, T.: A survey of algorithms for calculating power indices of weighted majority games. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan 43 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Milgrom, P.: Putting Auction Theory To Work. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Monderer, D., Tennenholtz, M.: Strong mediated equilibrium. Artificial Intelligence 173(1), 180–195 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Resnick, E., Bachrach, Y., Meir, R., Rosenschein, J.: The cost of stability in network flow games. In: Královič, R., Niwiński, D. (eds.) MFCS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5734, pp. 636–650. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Shapley, L.S.: A value for n-person games. Cont. Theory of Games (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shapley, L.S.: Cores of convex games. Internat. J. Game Theory 1, 12–26 (1971)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Sullivan, A., Sheffrin, S.: Economics: principles in action. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vickrey, W.: Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. The Journal of Finance 16(1), 8–37 (1961)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Weber, R.J.: Probabilistic values for games. Technical Report, Cowles (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Winter, E.: The Shapley Value. Game theory with economic applications (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yokoo, M., Conitzer, V., Sandholm, T., Ohta, N., Iwasaki, A.: Coalitional games in open anonymous environments. In: AAAI (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zuckerman, M., Faliszewski, P., Bachrach, Y., Elkind, E.: Manipulating the quota in weighted voting games. In: AAAI (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bachrach, Y., Key, P., Zadimoghaddam, M. (2010). Collusion in VCG Path Procurement Auctions. In: Saberi, A. (eds) Internet and Network Economics. WINE 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6484. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17572-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17572-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17571-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17572-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics