Advertisement

Agent Based Ontology Driven Virtual Meeting Assistant

  • Phil Thompson
  • Anne James
  • Emanuel Stanciu
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6485)

Abstract

It is widely recognized that much management time and effort is expended in attending meetings and being such a costly resource it is important that the decision to attend a meeting is not taken lightly. Because of this many busy executives are rejecting face-to-face meetings in favour of virtual meetings involving both high and low complexity technological solutions. This paper proposes an agent based, ontology driven meeting assistant designed to support virtual meetings. Situated on a graph database and operating over a peer-to-peer network the ontology will provide the basic vocabulary for the meeting and the semantics required to achieve a dialogue between the agents and the human interface used by the meeting assistant.

Keywords

Virtual meetings Peer-to-peer Multi-agent systems Ontology Graph database 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Thompson, P., Iqbal, R.: Supporting the Social Dynamics of Meetings using Peer-to-peer Architecture. In: Proceedings of the 15th International workshops on Conceptual Structure, CSCWD 2007, pp. 170–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thompson, P., Iqbal, R., James, A.: Supporting collaborative virtual meetings using multi-agent systems, cscwd. In: Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, pp. 276–281 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Armfield, R.: Virtual meetings save real money, Bank Technology News 23(7), 13 (2010) (AN52411030)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ellis, C., Barthelmess, P.: The Neem Dram. In: Proceeding of the 23rd Conference on Diversity in Computing (TAPIA 2003), pp. 23–29. ACM Press, New York (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boehmer, J.: Harvard study shows face-to-face meeting value, rising virtual interest. Meeting News 33(12), 9, 1p, 1 Chart (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scofidio, B.: Why Should(n’t) You Manage Virtual Meetings. Corporate Meetings & Incentives 27(8), 4, 1 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bulkeley, W.: Better Virtual Meetings. Wall Street Journal-Eastern Edition 248(75), B1-B5 (1987)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kharif, O.: The Virtual Meeting Room. Business Week Online, 6, 1 (2007) AN 24781227Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Black, A.C.: Getting The Best From Virtual Meetings. Bloomsbury Business Library – Manage Meetings Positively, 60–71, 12 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miranda, M., Bostrom, P.: Meeting facilitation: process versus content interventions. Journal of Management information systems 15(4), 89–114 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barker, A.: Crash Course in having effective meetings. Management Today 22(2/3) (June 2008) (AN 32828858) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scofidio, B.: People Management.: How to have effective meetings, vol. 14(20), p. 45, 1 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McQuaid, M., et al.: Tools for distributed facilitation. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p. 10 (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fisher, L.: Make way for intelligent agents, cited by: Strategy & Business. In: Booz & Company 2010 (1995)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lesser, V.: Encyclopedia of Computer Science, 4th edn., pp. 1194–1196 (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barthes, J.-P.A.: OMAS – A flexible multi-agent environment for CSWD. In: Computer Supported Co-Operative Work in Design 2009, pp. 258–263 (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gruber, T.R.: A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2), 199–220 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kellerer, W.: Dienstarchitekturen in der Telekommunikation – Evolution, Methoden undVergleich. Technical Report TUM-LKN-TR-9801 (1998)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Phil Thompson
    • 1
  • Anne James
    • 1
  • Emanuel Stanciu
    • 1
  1. 1.Distributed Systems and Modeling Research GroupCoventry UniversityUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations