Abstract
Forgetfulness results in interference and/or deletion. Visual short-term memory (VSTM) gradually decays as the retention time elapses, causing forgetfulness. Little is known about forgetfulness in VSTM, while substantial studies on VSTM have focused on the process of memory encoding, often with control of attention. Evidences suggest that the prefrontal cortex may contribute to maintain short-term memory during extended retention periods while the posterior parietal cortex may support the capacity-limited store of visual items. Here we conduct a visual memory experiment to measure the levels and source of memory decay. In particular, multiple retention intervals were used between the presentation of a study array and a cue. The results show that the correct response to cued objects decreased as retention interval increased while that to uncued and novel objects remain unchanged. These data indicate that forgetfulness in VSTM is primarily due to interference rather than memory deletion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Mack, A., Rock, I.: Inattentional Blindness. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)
Makovski, T., Sussman, R., Jiang, Y.V.: Orienting Attention in Visual Working Memory Reduces Interference From Memory Probes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 34(2), 369–380 (2008)
Griffin, I.C., Nobre, A.: Orienting Attention to Locations in Internal Representations. J.Cogn. Neurosci. 15(8), 1176–1194 (2003)
Sligate, I.G., Scholte, H.S., Lamme, V.A.: Are there multiple visual short-term memory stores? PLOS one 3(2), e1699 (2008)
Xu, Y., Chun, M.: Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects. Nature 440(7080), 91–95 (2006)
Pessoa, L., Gutierrez, E., Bandettini, P., Ungerleider, L.: Neural correlates of visual working memory: fMRI amplitude predicts task performance. Neuron 35(5), 975–987 (2002)
Cohen, J.D., Perlstein, W.M., Braver, T.S., Nystrom, L.E., Noll, D.C., Jonides, J., Smith, E.E.: Temporal dynamics of brain activation during a working memory task. Nature 386(6625), 604–608 (1997)
Funahashi, S.: Prefrontal cortex and working memory processes. Neuroscience 139(1), 251–261 (2006)
Vuilleumier, P., Schwartz, S., Duhoux, S., Dolan, R.J., Driver, J.: Selective attention modulates neural substrates of repetition priming and “implicit” visual memory: suppressions and enhancements revealed by FMRI. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17(8), 1245–1260 (2005)
Prinzmetal, W., McCool, C., Park, S.: Attention Reaction Time and Accuracy Reveal Different Mechanisms. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 134(1), 73–92 (2005)
Nobre, A.C., Coull, J.T., Maquet, P., Frith, C.D., Vandenberghe, R., Mesulam, M.M.: Orienting Attention to Locations in Perceptual Versus Mental Representations. J. Cogn. Neurosc. 16(3), 363–373 (2004)
Posner, M.: Orienting of attention. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 32(1), 3–25 (1980)
Constantinidis, C., Wang, X.J.: A neural circuit basis for spatial working memory. Neuroscientist 10(6), 553–565 (2004)
Hoshino, E., Mogi, K.: Trade-off in the Effect of Attention for Visual Short-term Memory. Association for the Scientific Study of Consciousness 14 (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hoshino, E., Mogi, K. (2010). Evidence for False Memory before Deletion in Visual Short-Term Memory. In: Wong, K.W., Mendis, B.S.U., Bouzerdoum, A. (eds) Neural Information Processing. Theory and Algorithms. ICONIP 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6443. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17537-4_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17537-4_32
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17536-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17537-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)