Abstract
Employing multi-level abstraction in modeling refers to representing objects at multiple levels of one or more abstraction hierarchies, mainly classification, aggregation and generalization. Multiple representation, however, leads to accidental complexity, complicating modeling and extension. Several modeling techniques, like powertypes, deep instantiation, materialization, m-objects, HERM, and the component model may be used to reduce unnecessary complexity with multi-level abstraction. This chapter compares these modeling techniques using four comparison criteria: (1) compactness (modular and redundancy-free models), (2) query flexibility (number and kind of pre-defined entry points for querying), (3) heterogeneous level-hierarchies, and (4) multiple relationship-abstractions (such as between relationship occurrence and relationship type).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aschauer, T., Dauenhauer, G., Pree, W.: Multi-level Modeling for Industrial Automation Systems. In: EUROMICRO-SEAA, pp. 490–496 (2009)
Atkinson, C.: Meta-Modeling for Distributed Object Environments. In: EDOC (1997)
Atkinson, C., Auletta, V.: The Essence of Multilevel Metamodeling. In: Gogolla, M., Kobryn, C. (eds.) UML 2001. LNCS, vol. 2185, pp. 19–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: Model-Driven Development: A Metamodeling Foundation. IEEE Software 20(5), 36–41 (2003)
Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: Reducing accidental complexity in domain models. Software and System Modeling 7(3), 345–359 (2008)
Cardelli, L.: Structural Subtyping and the Notion of Power Type. In: POPL, pp. 70–79 (1988)
Chen, P.P.: The Entity-Relationship Model - Toward a Unified View of Data. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1(1), 9–36 (1976)
Dahchour, M., Pirotte, A., Zimányi, E.: Materialization and Its Metaclass Implementation. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 14(5), 1078–1094 (2002)
Goldstein, R.C., Storey, V.C.: Materialization. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 6(5), 835–842 (1994)
Gonzalez-Perez, C., Henderson-Sellers, B.: A powertype-based metamodelling framework. Software and System Modeling 5(1), 72–90 (2006)
Gutheil, M., Kennel, B., Atkinson, C.: A Systematic Approach to Connectors in a Multi-level Modeling Environment. In: Busch, C., Ober, I., Bruel, J.-M., Uhl, A., Völter, M. (eds.) MODELS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5301, pp. 843–857. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Henderson-Sellers, B., Gonzalez-Perez, C.: Connecting Powertypes and Stereotypes. Journal of Object Technology 4, 83–96 (2005)
Hull, R., King, R.: Semantic database modeling: survey, applications, and research issues. ACM Comput. Surv. 19(3), 201–260 (1987)
Klas, W., Schrefl, M.: Metaclasses and Their Application - Data Model Tailoring and Database Integration. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)
Kühne, T., Schreiber, D.: Can programming be liberated from the two-level style: multi-level programming with deepjava. In: OOPSLA, pp. 229–244 (2007)
Kühne, T., Steimann, F.: Tiefe Charakterisierung. In: Modellierung, pp. 109–119 (2004)
Motik, B.: On the Properties of Metamodeling in OWL. J. Log. Comput. 17(4), 617–637 (2007)
Neumayr, B.: Multi-Level Modeling with M-Objects and M-Relationships. Ph.D. thesis, Johannes Kepler Universität Linz (2010), http://www.dke.jku.at/research/publications/PT1002.pdf
Neumayr, B., Grün, K., Schrefl, M.: Multi-Level Domain Modeling with M-Objects and M-Relationships. In: Link, S., Kirchberg, M. (eds.) APCCM. CRPIT, vol. 96, pp. 107–116. ACS, Wellington (2009)
Neumayr, B., Schrefl, M.: Multi-level Conceptual Modeling and OWL. In: Heuser, C.A., Pernul, G. (eds.) ER 2009 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 5833, pp. 189–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Neumayr, B., Schrefl, M., Thalheim, B.: Hetero-Homogeneous Hierarchies in Data Warehouses. In: Link, S., Ghose, A. (eds.) APCCM. CRPIT, vol. 110, pp. 61–70. ACS, Brisbane (2010)
Odell, J.J.: Power Types. In: Advanced Object-Oriented Analysis & Design Using UML, pp. 23–32. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998); also published as: James Odell: Power Types. JOOP 7(2), 8–12 (1994)
Olivé, A.: Conceptual Modeling of Information Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Pirotte, A., Zimányi, E., Massart, D., Yakusheva, T.: Materialization: A Powerful and Ubiquitous Abstraction Pattern. In: VLDB, pp. 630–641, 0605 (1994)
Schewe, K.D., Thalheim, B.: Component-driven engineering of database applications. In: APCCM, pp. 105–114 (2006)
Schrefl, M., Tjoa, A.M., Wagner, R.: Comparison-Criteria for Semantic Data Models. In: ICDE, pp. 120–125 (1984)
Schütz, C.: Extending data warehouses with hetero-homogeneous dimension hierarchies and cubes – A proof-of-concept prototype in Oracle. Master’s thesis, Johannes Kepler Universität Linz (2010), http://www.dke.jku.at/research/publications/MT1002.pdf
Thalheim, B.: Entity-Relationship Modeling: Foundations of Database Technology. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Thalheim, B.: Component development and construction for database design. Data Knowl. Eng. 54(1), 77–95 (2005)
Thalheim, B.: Visual SQL (2008), http://www.informatik.uni-kiel.de/en/is/miscellaneous/visualsql/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Neumayr, B., Schrefl, M., Thalheim, B. (2011). Modeling Techniques for Multi-level Abstraction. In: Kaschek, R., Delcambre, L. (eds) The Evolution of Conceptual Modeling. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6520. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17505-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17505-3_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17504-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17505-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)