Skip to main content

Comparing Learning Results of Web Based and Traditional Learning Students

  • Conference paper
Advances in Web-Based Learning – ICWL 2010 (ICWL 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6483))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Appropriately designed web based learning materials are thought to be more efficient than traditional ones because of interactivity and multimedia, which enable clear explanations, motivating design, active learning, instant feedback and other advantages. Our research question is whether students achieve better learning results if they learn from web based learning materials than from traditional ones. Although the research results show that students spent less time learning from traditional learning materials than students learning from web based learning materials, the differences of learning times were not significant. However, we proved significant differences in terms of gained knowledge. The students using web based learning materials performed significantly better than students using traditional learning materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Achtemeier, S.D., Morris, L.V., Finnegan, C.L.: Considerations for developing evaluations of online courses. Journal of Asychronous Learning Networks (JALN) 7(1), 1–13 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ardito, C., et al.: An Approach to Usability Evaluation of e-Learning Applications. Universal access in the information society 4(3), 270–283 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barron, J.: Top ten secrets of effective e-learning. Industrial and commercial training 38(7), 360–364 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chickering, A.W., Ehrmann, S.C.: Implementing the seven principles: Technology as lever. AAHE Bulletin 49 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Downes, S.: E-learning 2.0. eLearn Magazine 10 (2005), http://www.elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?section=articles&article=29-1

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ko, S., Rossen, S.: Teaching Online: A Practical Guide. Houghton Mifflin Company, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kolb, D.: Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lapuh Bele, J., Rugelj, J.: Efficient learning from multimedia web-based learning contents. In: MÉNdez-Vilas, A. (ed.) Current developments in technology-assisted education, vol. 1, pp. 396–400 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lapuh Bele, J., Rugelj, J.: Comparing efficiency of web based learning contents on different media. Int. j. emerg. technol. learn. 4(3), 31–35 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mayer, R.E.: Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press, New York (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Mayer, R.E.: Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. In: Mayer, R. (ed.) The Cambridge handbook of Multimedia learning, pp. 31–48. Cambridge University Press, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller, G.A.: The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information. The Psychological Review 63, 81–97 (1956)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Paivio, A.: Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Piaget, J.: The Origins of Intelligence in Children. International University Press, New York (1952), http://www.piaget.org/free-books.html

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Squires, D., Preece, J.: Predicting Quality in Educational Software: Evaluating for Learning. Usability and the Synergy between them. Interacting with Computers 11, 467–483 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sweller, J.: Implications of Cognitive Load Theory for Multimedia Learning. In: Mayer, R. (ed.) The Cambridge handbook of Multimedia learning, pp. 19–30. Cambridge University Press, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1978)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bele, J.L., Rugelj, J. (2010). Comparing Learning Results of Web Based and Traditional Learning Students. In: Luo, X., Spaniol, M., Wang, L., Li, Q., Nejdl, W., Zhang, W. (eds) Advances in Web-Based Learning – ICWL 2010. ICWL 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6483. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17407-0_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17407-0_39

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17406-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17407-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics