Carbon-Aware Business Process Design in Abnoba

  • Konstantin Hoesch-Klohe
  • Aditya Ghose
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6470)


A key element of any approach to meeting the climate change challenge is the ability to improve operational efficiency in a pervasive fashion. The notion of a business process is a particularly useful unit of analysis in this context. This article describes a subset of the Abnoba framework for green business process management and shows how an algebraic framework can be leveraged to enable an environmental assessment on multiple heterogeneous dimensions (of qualitative or quantitative nature). Furthermore, a machinery for process improvement is outlined.


Business Process Global Warming Potential Business Process Modeling Notation Combination Operator Process Fragment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Object Management Group: Business process modeling notation (bpmn) 1.2. , (2009), last checked 21.02
  2. 2.
    Ghose, A., Hoesch-Klohe, K., Hinsche, L., Le, L.S.: Green business process management: A research agenda. Australian Journal of Information Systems 16 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hoesch-Klohe, K., Ghose, A.: Towards Green Business Process Management. In: Proc. of the 7th International Conference on Services Computing (Industry and Application Track) (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bistarelli, S., Montanari, U., Rossi, F.: Semiring-based constraint satisfaction and optimization. Journal of the ACM (JACM) 44(2), 236 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ghose, A., Koliadis, G.: Pctk: A toolkit for managing business process compliance. In: Proc. of the Second International Workshop on Juris-informatics (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pavlovski, C., Zou, J.: Non-functional requirements in business process modeling. In: Proc. of the fifth on Asia-Pacific conference on conceptual modelling (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gorton, S., Reiff-Marganiec, S.: Towards a task-oriented, policy-driven business requirements specification for web services. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4102, p. 465. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ghose, A., Koliadis, G.: Auditing business process compliance. In: Krämer, B.J., Lin, K.-J., Narasimhan, P. (eds.) ICSOC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4749, pp. 169–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ghose, A., Koliadis, G.: Pctk: A toolkit for managing business process compliance. In: Proc. of the 2008 International Workshop on Juris Informatics (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hinge, K., Ghose, A., Koliadis, G.: Process seer: A tool for semantic effect annotation of business process models. In: Proc. of the 13th IEEE International EDOC Conference, EDOC 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morrison, E.D., Menzies, A., Koliadis, G., Ghose, A.K.: Business process integration: Method and analysis. In: Proc. Sixth Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling, APCCM 2009 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Konstantin Hoesch-Klohe
    • 1
  • Aditya Ghose
    • 1
  1. 1.Decision Systems Lab (DSL), School of Computer Science and Software EngineeringUniversity of WollongongAustralia

Personalised recommendations