Skip to main content

Making Hidden Priorities Explicit

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Working with Preferences: Less Is More

Part of the book series: Cognitive Technologies ((COGTECH))

  • 694 Accesses

Abstract

Users’ preferences show up in different formats: quantitative vs. qualitative, conditional vs. unconditional, prioritized vs. flat, etc. In fact, depending on the reason, it could be more natural to express preferences in one a format or another. Thus, it became a challenge for researchers to adequately capture many varieties of preference forms. To this end, artificial intelligence has seen a number of compact languages for preference representation (cf. Chapter 3). However, each language has not been conceived to explicitly and naturally capture all forms of preferences. Instead, it focuses on a particular specification of preferences. It induces a preference relation over the set of outcomes which is a partial or total (pre)order.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Representing default rules in possibilistic logic. In: Nebel, B., Rich, C., Swartout, W.R. (eds.), 3rd International Conference of Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 673-684. Morgan Kaufmann, (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Kaci, S., Prade, H.: Bridging logical, comparative and graphical possibilistic representation frameworks. In: Benferhat, S., Besnard, P. (eds.), 6th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty, pp. 422-431. Springer, (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Kaci, S., Prade, H.: Possibilistic logic representation of preferences:relating prioritized goals and satisfaction levels expressions. In: van Harmelen, F. (eds.), 15th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 685-689. IOS Press, (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Benferhat, S., Kaci, S.: A possibilistic logic handling of strong preferences. In: Smith, M.H., Gruver, W.A. (eds.), International Fuzzy Systems Association, pp. 962-967. (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brafman, R.I., Domshlak, C.: Introducing variable importance tradeoffs into CP-nets. In: Darwiche, A., Friedman, N. (eds.), 18th International Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 69-76. Morgan Kaufmann, (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewka, G., Niemel¨a, I., Truszczynski, M.: Answer set optimization. In: Gottlob, G., Walsh, T. (eds.), 18th Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 867-872. Morgan Kaufmann, (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Coste-Marquis, S., Lang, J., Liberatore, P., Marquis, P.: Expressive power and succinctness of propositional languages for preference representation. In: Dubois, D., Welty, C.A., Williams, M.A. (eds.), 9th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 203-212. AAAI Press, (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Domshlak, C., Rossi, F., Venable, K.B., Walsh, T.: Reasoning about soft constraints and conditional preferences: complexity results and approximation techniques. In: Gottlob, G., Walsh, T. (eds.), 18th Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 215-220. Morgan Kaufmann, (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, J., Lang, J., Truszczynski, M.,Wilson, N.: The computational complexity of dominance and consistency in CP-nets. In: Kaelbling, L.P., Saffiotti, A. (eds.), 19th Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 144-149. Professional Book Center, (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaci, S., Prade, H.: Mastering the processing of preferences by using symbolic priorities. In: Ghallab, M. Spyropoulos, C.D., Fakotakis, N., Avouris, N.M. (eds.), 18th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 376-380. IOS Press, (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Souhila Kaci .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kaci, S. (2011). Making Hidden Priorities Explicit. In: Working with Preferences: Less Is More. Cognitive Technologies. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17280-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17280-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17279-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17280-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics