A Logistics Workload for Event Notification Middleware

  • Stefan Appel
  • Kai Sachs
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6462)


The event-based paradigm plays an important role to reflect logistics processes in modern IT infrastructures. Events occur at many stages, e.g., when goods tagged with RFID chips are scanned, when transportation vehicles move or when sensors report environmental observations. These events have to be delivered to interested consumers by a reliable notification middleware, which is crucial for a successful implementation of event-based applications. Specified service levels have to be fulfilled and to guarantee them, an exhaustive evaluation and analysis of the underlying event notification middleware is required. This can be achieved by applying well-defined test scenarios that allow us to analyze different aspects of the middleware in an independent and representative way.

In this paper we present a realistic workload originating from a real world scenario in the logistics domain. Our workload is suited to test event notification middleware under realistic conditions; it stresses different aspects of the middleware while being scalable.


Event Producer Environment Sensor Transportation Vehicle Logistics Domain Realistic Workload 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Appel, S., Sachs, K., Buchmann, A.: Quality of service in event-based systems. In: Proceedings of the 22. GI-Workshop on Foundations of Databases, GvD (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Behnel, S., Fiege, L., Mühl, G.: On Quality-of-Service and Publish/Subscribe. In: Proceedings of the 26th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops: Fifth International Workshop on Distributed Event-based Systems (DEBS 2006). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chandy, K.M., Schulte, W.: Event Processing: Designing IT Systems for Agile Companies. Mcgraw-Hill Professional, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chappell, D.: Enterprise Service Bus. O’Reilly, Sebastopol (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Geppert, A., Gatziu, S., Dittrich, K.R.: A Designer’s Benchmark for Active Database Management Systems: oo7 Meets the BEAST. In: Sellis, T.K. (ed.) RIDS 1995. LNCS, vol. 985, Springer, Heidelberg (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hinze, A., Sachs, K., Buchmann, A.: Event-Based Applications and Enabling Technologies. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems (DEBS 2009). ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    McCormick, B., Madden, L.: Open architecture publish subscribe benchmarking. In: Proceedings of the OMG Real-Time and Embedded Systems Workshop (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mendes, M.R.N., Bizarro, P., Marques, P.: A framework for performance evaluation of complex event processing systems. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Distributed Event-based Systems (DEBS 2008): Demonstration Session. ACM, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moore, J., Collins, T., Shrestha, S.: An open architecture for detecting earthquakes using mobile devices, vol. 1, pp. 437–441 (April 2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mühl, G., Fiege, L., Pietzuch, P.: Distributed Event-Based Systems. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus (2006)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sachs, K.: Performance Modeling and Benchmarking of Event-Based Systems. PhD thesis, TU Darmstadt (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sachs, K., Appel, S., Kounev, S., Buchmann, A.: Benchmarking Publish/Subscribe-based Messaging Systems. In: Yoshikawa, M., Meng, X., Yumoto, T., Ma, Q., Sun, L., Watanabe, C. (eds.) DASFAA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6193, pp. 203–214. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sachs, K., Kounev, S., Bacon, J., Buchmann, A.: Performance evaluation of message-oriented middleware using the SPECjms2007 benchmark. Performance Evaluation 66(8), 410–434 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    United Parcel Service of America, Inc. UPS facts website (August 2010),
  15. 15.
    Varshney, U.: Pervasive healthcare and wireless health monitoring. Mob. Netw. Appl. 12(2-3), 113–127 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Appel
    • 1
  • Kai Sachs
    • 1
  1. 1.TU DarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations