Skip to main content

User-Centered Radical Innovation at Deutsche Telekom Laboratories

  • 2389 Accesses

Abstract

The necessity of appropriately dealing with the specific uncertainties in innovation development is undisputed, in both the worlds of daily business and of scientific research. Pursuing great opportunities at the price of a higher risk radical innovation projects present a particular challenge to management. In the context of radical innovation user orientation must be considered in a balanced way. Positive effects may depend upon the type of users focused on and the methods used. User characteristics like for instances technical competence or lead user criteria are considered to be important resources for radical innovation management. The paper describes the concept of user-centered radical innovation and how it is applied within Deutsche Telekom Laboratories – the corporate R&D centre of Deutsche Telekom. The concept is based on tools tailored to three innovation phases: initiation, business modelling and market driving.

Keywords

  • Open Innovation
  • User Orientation
  • Radical Innovation
  • Organizational Innovation
  • Divergent Thinking

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Alam, I. (2006). Removing the Fuzziness from the Fuzzy Front-End of Service Innovations Through Customer Interactions. Industrial Marketing Management, 35 (4), 468–480.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (2005). Market Orientation and the New Product Paradox. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22 (6), 483–502.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Binsack, M. (2003). Akzeptanz neuer Produkte. Vorwissen als Determinante des Innovationserfolgs. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun V., & Herstatt, C. (2006). Barriers to User-Innovation: The Paradigm of Permission to Innovate. IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, Conference Proceedings, June 20–23 2006, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuer, H. (2002). Interfacegestaltung und Imagination: Kultivation von Unternehmensidentitäten in digitalen Medien. (Interface Design and Imagination). Berlin: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuer, H., Hewing, M., & Steinhoff, F. (2009). Divergent Innovation: Fostering and Managing the Fuzzy Front End of Innovation, Proceedings of 9th Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology Conference (PICMET Conference), August, 02–06 2009, Portland, OR, USA, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W., & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries. R&D Management, 36 (3), 229–236.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., & Bower, J. L. (1996). Customer Power, Strategic Investment, and the Failure of Leading Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (3), 197–218.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., Anthony, S. D., Berstell, G., & Nitterhouse, D. (2007). Finding the Right Job For Your Product. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48 (3), 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 128–152.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, E. (2002). The Dynamics of Product Innovation and Firm Competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23 (12), 1095–1121.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, E. (2003). Tight-Loose Coupling with Customers: The Enactment of Customer Orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (6), 559–576.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. S. (2002). Managing the Market Learning Process. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 17 (4), 240–252.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte (2007). Telecommunications Predictions: Technology Media & Telecommunications Trends 2007, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Telekom Laboratories (2009). Jahresbericht 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easingwood, C., & Harrington, S. (2002). Launching and Re-Launching High Technology Products. Technovation, 22 (11), 657–666.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Enkel, E., Kausch, C., & Gassmann, O. (2005). Managing the Risk of Customer Integration. European Management Journal, 23 (2), 203–213.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Erner, M., Arnold, H., & Presse, V. (2008). Organisatorische Implikationen von Open Innovation auf das Innovationssystem. In W. H. Schmeisser, & H. Mohnkopf (Eds.). Ausgewählte Beiträge zum Innovationsmanagement, zur empirischen Mittelstandsforschung und zum Patentschutz. München und Mering: Rainer Hampp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, A., Schlake, O., & Siebe, A. (2000). Wie Sie mit Szenarien die Zukunft voraus denken. Was Szenarien für die Früherkennung leisten und wie sie konkrete Entscheidungen unterstützen. Harvard Business Manager, 8 (2), 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finke, R. A. (1990). Creative Imagery: Discoveries and Inventions in Visualization. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Eribaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A Critical Look at Technological Innovation Typology and Innovativeness Terminology: A Literature Review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19 (2), 110–132.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gemünden, H. G., Ritter, T., & Heydebreck, P. (1996). Network Configuration and Innovation Success: An Empirical Analysis in German High-Tech Industries. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13 (5), 449–462.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Green, S. G., Gavin, M. B., & Aiman-Smith, L. (1995). Assessing a Multidimensional Measure of Radical Technological Innovation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 42 (3), 203–214.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gruner, K. E. (1997). Kundeneinbindung in den Produktinnovationsprozess. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruner, K. E., & Homburg, C. (2000). Does Customer Interaction Enhance New Product Success? Journal of Business Research, 49, 1–14.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hauschildt, J., & Salomo, S. (2007). Innovationsmanagement. München: Verlag Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iansiti, M., & Clark, K. B. (1994). Integration and Dynamic Capability: Evidence from Product Development in Automobiles and Mainframe Computers. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3 (Special Issue 1), 557–605.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jungk, R., & Müller, N. (1987). Future Workshops: How to Create Desirable Futures. London, England: Institute for Social Inventions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the Competition Irrelevant. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensson, P., & Magnusson, P. R. (2010). Tuning Users’ Innovativeness During Ideation. Creativity and Innovation Management. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnt, B., & Müller, N. (2004). Moderationsfibel Zukunftswerkstätten: Verstehen, Anleiten, Einsetzen. 3rd Edition. Neu-Ulm: AG SPAK Bücher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., & O’Connor, G. C. (2003). The Impact of Communication Strategy on Launching New Products: The Moderating Role of Product Innovativeness. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20 (1), 4–21.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, D. (2002). The Limitations of Listening. Harvard Business Review, 80 (January), 93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler, U. (2008). Open Innovation in Practice: An Analysis of Strategic Approaches to Technology Transactions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55 (1), 148–157.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, G. S., & Akgün, A. E. (1998). Innovation Strategies Under Uncertainty: A Contingency Approach for New Product Development. Engineering Management Journal, 10 (3), 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (1995). Ignore Your Customer. Fortune, (May 1), 83–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K., & Harris, L. C. (2005). Pitfalls in Evaluating Market Orientation: An Exploration of Executives’ Interpretations. Long Range Planning, 38 (4), 373–391.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Min, S., Kalwani, M. U., & Robinson, W. T. (2006). Market Pioneer and Early Follower Survival Risks: A Contingency Analysis of Really New Versus Incrementally New Product-Markets. Journal of Marketing, 70 (1), 15–33.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Münchner Kreis e.V., EICT GmbH, Deutsche Telekom AG, & TNS Infratest (Hrsg.). (2009). Zukunft und Zukunftsfähigkeit der Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien und Medien. Internationale Delphi-Studie 2030. Retrieved from http://www.zukunft-ikt.de.

  • O’Connor, G. C., & Veryzer, R. W. (2001). The Nature of Market Visioning for Technology-Based Radical Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18, 231–246.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, L. S. (1999). Inter-Firm Knowledge Management and Technology Development in Radical Innovation. In D. F. Kocaoglu, & T. R. Anderson. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), 179–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2000). Wenn Kundenkompetenz das Geschäftsmodell mitbestimmt. Harvard Business Manager, 22 (4), 64–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prügl, R., & Schreier, M. (2006). Learning from Leading-Edge Customers at The Sims: Opening up the Innovation Process Using Toolkits. R&D Management, 36 (3), 237–250.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ram, S., & Sheth, J. N. (1989). Consumer Resistance to Innovations: The Marketing Problem and its Solutions. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 6 (2), 5–14.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach, R. E., & Grimes, S. (1984). How Concept Knowledge Affects Concept Evaluation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1 (4), 255–266.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, S. R., & Capper, M. (2006). Ethnographies in the Front End: Designing for Enhanced Customer Experiences. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23 (3), 215–237.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M.; Merlin Consulting Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomo, S. (2003). Konzept und Messung des Innovationsgrades: Ergebnisse einer empirischen Studie zu innovativen Entwicklungsvorhaben. In M. Schwaiger, & D. Harhoff. Empirie und Betriebswirtschaft. Entwicklungen und Perspektiven, 399–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, B. (2005). The Hidden Market: Even for Those Who Create It? Customer-related Proactiveness in Developing Radical Innovations. Turku: Turku School of Economics and Business Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1910). Über das Wesen der Wirtschaftskrisen. Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft, Sozialpolitik und Verwaltung, 19, 271–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, X. M., & Parry, M. E. (1999). Challenges of Managing the Development of Breakthrough Products in Japan. Journal of Operations Management, 17 (6), 665–688.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Steinhoff, F. (2006). Kundenorientierung bei hochgradigen Innovationen: Konzeptualisierung, empirische Bestandsaufnahme und Erfolgsbetrachtung. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmüller, A., & Steinmüller K. (2003). Wild Cards. Wenn das Unwahrscheinliche eintritt. Munich: Gerling Akademie Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulwick, A. W. (2002). Turn Customer Input into Innovation. Harvard Business Review, 80 (1), 91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Meer, H. (2007). Open Innovation – The Dutch Treat: Challenges in Thinking in Business Models. Creativity & Innovation Management, 16 (2), 192–202.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead-Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts. Management Science, 32 (7), 791–805.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zirger, B. J. (1997). The Influence of Development Experience and Product Innovativeness on Product Outcome. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 9 (3), 287–297.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fee Steinhoff .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Steinhoff, F., Breuer, H. (2011). User-Centered Radical Innovation at Deutsche Telekom Laboratories. In: Hülsmann, M., Pfeffermann, N. (eds) Strategies and Communications for Innovations. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17223-6_24

Download citation