Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Arbeits-, Organisations- und Personalpsychologie pp 67–92Cite as

Führung

  • Chapter

  • 27k Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer-Lehrbuch ((SLB))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Weiterführende Literatur

  • Felfe, J. (2009). Mitarbeiterführung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grote, S. & Kauffeld, S. (in Druck). Die Zukunft der Führung. Berlin, New York, Tokio, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, O. (2002), Führen und führen lassen, 6. Aufl. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstiel, L. von (2009). Führung von Mitarbeitern: Handbuch für erfolgreiches Personalmanagement. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Alvesson, M. & Berg, P. O. (1992). Corporate Culture and Organizational Symbolism. Berlin, New York: de Guyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. & Bass, B. (1987). Transformational leadership, charisma and beyond. In: J. Hunt, B. R. Baliga, H. P. Dachler & C. A. Schriesheim (Hrsg.), Emerging leadership vistas (S. 29–49) Lexington, MA: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., Reichard, R. J., Hannah, S. T., Walumbwa, F. O. & Chan, A. (2009). 100 Years of Leadership Intervention Studies: A Meta-Analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 764–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrera, M., Sandler, I. N. & Ramsay, T. B. (1981). Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 435–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications, 3rd ed. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industry, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational Leadership: A Response to Critiques. In M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman. Leadership Theory and Research: Perspectives and Directions (S. 49–80). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving Organizational Effectiveness Through Transformational Leadership. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R. R. & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The managerial grid. Houston, TX: Gulf Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blickle, G. (2004): Einflusskompetenz in Organisationen. Psychologische Rundschau, 55 (2), 82–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bono, J. E. & Judge, T. A. (2004). Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 901–910.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K. & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117– 134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlyle, T. (1888) On Heroes, Hero-Worship and the Heroic in History. New York: Stokes & Brother.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E. & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1217–1234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T. Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor (NEO-FFI) Inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Hoogh, A. H. B. & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader's social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates' optimism: A multimethod study. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1998). Die Praxis des Managements. Düsseldorf: Econ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elger, C. E. (2009). Neuroleadership: Erkenntnisse der Hirnforschung für die Führung von Mitarbeitern. München: Haufe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epitropaki, O. & Martin, R. (2005). From ideal to real: A longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 659–676.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Felfe, J. (2009). Mitarbeiterführung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felfe, J. & Heinitz, K. (2010). The impact of consensus and agreement of leadership perceptions on commitment, OCB and customer satisfaction. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19, 279–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fittkau-Garthe, H. & Fittkau, B. (1971). Fragebogen zur Vorgesetzten-Verhaltens-Beschreibung (FVVB). Handanweisung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forret, M. L. & Dougherty, T. W. (2004). Networking behaviors and career outcomes: differences for men and women? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 419–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, J. R. P. & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, D. (1996). Sprachspiele der Mikropolitik. Zwischen Aufklärung und Verwirrung. Organisationsentwicklung, 3, 71–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, D. (2002). Führung und Innovation. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, D. & von Rosenstiel, L. (2002). Organisationspsychologie: Person und Organisation. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstner, C. R. & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 827–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graen, G. B. & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leadermember exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grote, S. & Kauffeld, S. (2007). Stabilisieren oder dynamisieren: Das Balance-Inventar der Führung. In J. Erpenbeck & L. von Rosenstiel (Hrsg.), Handbuch Kompetenzmessung (S. 317–336). Stuttgart: Schäffer- Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grote, S., Kauffeld, S. & Weide, C. (2009). Stabilisierende und dynamisierende Kompetenzen von Führungskräften: Das Balance-Inventar der Führung. In S. Kauffeld, S. Grote & E. Frieling (Hrsg.), Handbuch Kompetenzentwicklung (S.107–123). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hentze, J., Kammel, A. & Lindert, K. (1997). Personalführungslehre: Grundlagen, Funktionen und Modelle der Führung. UTB Nr. 1374. Bern: Haupt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersey, B. & Blanchard, K. (1977). Management of Organizational Behavior. Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkin, T. R. & Tracey, J. B. (1999). The relevance of charisma for transformational leadership in stable organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12, 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. M. & Hall-Marenda, K. E. (1999). The ties that bind: The impact of leader-member exchange, transformational and transactional leadership, and distance on predicting follower performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 680–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossiep, R., Bittner, J. & Berndt, W. (2008). Mitarbeitergespräche – wirksam, nachhaltig, motivierend. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, J. (2001). Allgemeine Umweltsoziologie. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. K., Murphy, S. E., Zewdie, S. & Reichard, S. Z. (2008). The strong, sensitive type: Effects of gender stereotypes and leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 106, 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R. & Gerhardt, M. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765–780.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F. & Ilies, R. (2004). The forgotten ones? The validity of Consideration and Initiating Structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 36–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, D., Wu, A. & Chow, C. W. (2008). Towards understanding the direct and indirect effects of CEOs' transformational leadership on firm innovation. The Leadership Quaterly, 19, 585–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo, R. N. (2001). Ethical values of transactional and transformational leaders. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 18 (4), 257–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouzes, J. M. & Posner, B. Z. (1993). Credibility: How leaders gain and lose it, why people demand it. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K., Lippitt, R. & White, R. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created »social climates.« Journal of Social Psychology, 10 (3), 43–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock, M. & Wheeler, R. (2005). LJI – Leadership judgement indicator. Oxford: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G. & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthans, F., Hodgetts, R. M. & Rosenkrantz, S. (1988). Real managers. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, J. (2007). The business brain in close-up. Business Week, 23, 68–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mentzel, W., Grotzfeld, S. & Haub, C (2009). Mitarbeitergespräche: Mitarbeiter motivieren, richtig beurteilen und effektiv einsetzen. Planegg: Haufe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. & Yukl, G. A. (1993). Managerial Level and Submit Function as Determinants of Networking Behavior in Organizations. Group & Organization Management, 18 (3), 328–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, O. (2002). Führen und führen lassen. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, O. (2004). Das Mitarbeitergespräch. Leonberg: Rosenberger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, O. (2006). Mikropolitik: Stand der Forschung und Reflexion. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 50 (4), 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. L. (2005). Implicit theories and leadership perceptions in the thick of it: The effects of prototype matching, group setbacks, and group outcomes. In B. Schyns & J. R. Meindl (Hrsg.), The leadership horizon series. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, C. L. (2004). The future of leadership: Combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, C. L. & Manz, C. C. (2005). The new silver bullets of leadership: The importance of self- and shared leadership in knowledge work. Organizational Dynamics, 34, 130–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, C. L. & Sims, H. P. Jr. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics, 6, 172–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, M. T., Warka, J., Babasa, B., Betancourt, R. & Hooker, S. (1994). Development of self-efficacy and outcome expectancy scales for job-related applications. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 793–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S. (2000). Organizational behavior. Concepts-controversies-applications. Englewood Clifs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, D. & Ringleb, A. H. (2009). Defining NeuroLeadership as a field. NeuroLeadership Journal, 2, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L. & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowold, J. & Borgmann, L. (2009). Zum Zusammenhang zwischen ethischer Führung, Arbeitszufriedenheit und affektivem Commitment. Wirtschaftspsychologie, 2, 60–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, N. C., Honert, M. & Kauffeld, S. (2009). Leadership-Studie 2009 – Führen in Zeiten der Krise. Vortrag bei dem 8. Kongress für Wirtschaftspsychologie, Potsdam, 14.–15. Mai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholl, W. (1999). Restrictive control and information pathologies in organizations. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schyns, B. & Von Collani, G. 2002. A new occupational self-efficacy scale and its relation to personality constructs and organizational variables. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11 (2), 219–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silversthorne, C. (2001). Leadership effectiveness and personality: A cross-cultural evaluation. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 303–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solansky, S. T. (2008). Leadership style and team processes in self-managed teams. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14, 332–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock-Homburg, R. (2008). Personalmanagement. Wiebaden: Gabler

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, R. & Schmidt, W. H. (1973). How to choose a leadership pattern. Harvard Business Review, May–June, 162–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. A. (2005). Proactive personality and job performance. A social capital perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1011–1017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Türk, K. (1995). Entpersonalisierte Führung. In A. Kieser, G. Reber & R. Wunderer (Hrsg.), Handwörterbuch der Führung (S. 328–340). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Quaquebeke, N. & Brodbeck, F. C. (2008). Entwicklung und erste Validierung zweier Instrumente zur Erfassung von Führungskräfte-Kategorisierung im deutschsprachigen Raum. Zeitschrift für Arbeitsund Organisationspsychologie, 52, 70–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vigoda, E. (2003). Developments in Organizational Politics: How Political Dynamics affect Employee Performance in Modern Work SitesCheltenham; Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. H. & Yetton, P. W. (1973). Leadership and Decision Making. Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V.H. & Jago, A.G. (2007). The role of situation in leadership. American Psychologist, 62, 17–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wegge, J. (1994). Führung von Arbeitsgruppen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegge, J. (2001). Gruppenarbeit. In H. Schuler (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Personalpsychologie (S. 483–507). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegge, J. (2002). Führung von Arbeitsgruppen (Habilitationsschrift). Dortmund: Universität Dortmund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegge, J. (2002). Führung von Arbeitsgruppen (Habilitationsschrift). Dortmund: Universität Dortmund. Wegge, J. & Rosenstiel, L. von (2004). Führung. In H. Schuler, Lehrbuch Organisationspsychologie (S. 475– 513). Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weibler, J. (2001). Personalführung. München: Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderer, R. (2000). Führung und Zusammenarbeit. Eine unternehmerische Führungslehre. Neuwied: Luchterhand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderer, R. & Grunewald, W. (1980). Führungslehre. Berlin: de Gruyter

    Google Scholar 

  • Yankelovich, D. & Immerwahr J. (1983). Putting the Work Ethic to Work: A Public Agenda Report on Restoring America's Competitive Vitality. New York: The Public Agenda Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. & Van Fleet, D. D. (1992). Theory and Research on Leadership in Organisations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol. 3 (pp. 147–197). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Psychologie Arbeits-, Organisations- und Sozialpsychologie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Spielmannstr. 24, 38111, Braunschweig

    Univ.-Prof. Dr. Simone Kauffeld, Dipl.-Psych. Patrizia Maria Ianiro & Dipl.-Psych. Nils Christian Sauer

Authors
  1. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Simone Kauffeld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dipl.-Psych. Patrizia Maria Ianiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dipl.-Psych. Nils Christian Sauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kauffeld, S., Ianiro, P.M., Sauer, N.C. (2011). Führung. In: Arbeits-, Organisations- und Personalpsychologie. Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16999-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation