Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer-Lehrbuch ((SLB))

  • 42k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Im Arbeitsleben sind zwischenmenschliche Konflikte alltäglich und unvermeidlich. Denn Menschen haben ganz unterschiedliche und häufig gegensätzliche Überzeugungen und Bedürfnisse. Als Mitarbeiter desselben Unternehmens jedoch müssen sie – trotz gegensätzlicher Ansichten oder Interessen – koordiniert handeln, d. h. einander zuarbeiten, gemeinsam Entscheidungen treffen und ihre Aktivitäten im Sinne der gemeinsamen Unternehmensziele harmonisieren. Die Frage, wie sich das Handeln von Menschen mit unvereinbaren Überzeugungen oder Bedürfnissen effektiv koordinieren lässt und wie sich die Konflikte vermeiden und bewältigen lassen, die daraus resultieren, stellt eine zentrale Herausforderung für die Gestaltung von Organisationen dar (Jaffee, 2008).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Bazerman, M.H. & Moore, D.A. (2008). Judgement in managerial decision making(7 th ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blickle, G.& Solga, M. (2006). Einfluss, Konflikte, Mikropolitik. In H. Schuler (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Personalpsychologie(2. Aufl ., S. 611–650). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, B.J. & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75 ,219–229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Charash, Y. & Mueller, J.S. (2007). Does perceived unfairness exacerbate or mitigate interpersonal counterproductive work behaviors related to envy? , 666–680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J.A., Conlon, D.E., Wesson, M.J., Porter, C.O. & Ng, K.Y. (2001). Justice at the millemmium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 ,425–445.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dauenheimer, D., Stahlberg, D., Frey, D. & Petersen, L.E. (2002). Die Theorie des Selbstwertschutzes und der Selbstwerterhöhung. In D. Frey & M. Irle (Hrsg.), Theorien der Sozialpsychologie, Bd. III(2. Aufl ., S. 159–190). Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C.K. (2011). Conflict at work: Basic principles and applied issues. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Volume 3: Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization(pp. 461–493). Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C.K., Beersma, B., Steinel, W. & Kleef, G.A. van (2007). The psychology of negotiation: Principles and basic processes. In A.W. Kruglanski & E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of basic principles in social psychology(pp. 608–629). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C.K., Evers, A., Beersma, B., Kluwer, E.S. & Nauta, A. (2001). A theory-based measure of conflict management strategies in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22 ,645–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C.K. & Gelfand, M.J. (2008). Conflict in the workplace: Sources, functions, and dynamics across multiple levels of analysis. In C.K. De Dreu & M.J. Gelfand (Eds.), The psychology of conflict and conflict management in organizations(pp. 3–54). New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C.K. & Van de Vliert, E. (1997). Using conflict in organizations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C.K. & Weingart, L.R. (2003a). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 ,741–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C.K. & Weingart, L.R. (2003b). A contingency theory of task conflict and performance in groups and organizational teams. In M.A. West, D. Tjosvold & K.G. Smith (Eds.), International handbook of organizational teamwork and cooperative working (pp. 151–166). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M.(1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R., Ury, W. & Patton, B. (1984). Das Harvard-Konzept. Sachgerecht verhandeln – erfolgreich verhandeln. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasl, F.(1999). Konfliktmanagement. Ein Handbuch für Führungskräfte, Beraterinnen und Berater(6. Aufl .). Bern: Haupt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee, D. (2008). Conflict at work troughout the history of organizations. In C.K. De Dreu & M.J. Gelfand (Eds.), The psychology of conflict and conflict management in organizations (pp. 55–77). New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, O.& Van de Vliert, E. (1996). Concern for the other’s goals: Key to (de-)escalation of conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7 ,99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K.A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40 ,256–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K.A. & Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. In R.M. Kramer & B.M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 25(pp. 187–242). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K.A., Bezrukova, K. & Thatcher, S. (2008). Conflict, diversity, and faultlines in workgroups. In C.K. De Dreu & M.J. Gelfand (Eds.), The psychology of conflict and conflict management in organizations (pp. 179–210). New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • LePine, J.A., Piccolo, R.F., Jackson, C.L., Mathieu, J.E. & Saul, J.R. (2008). A meta-analysis of team work processes: Toward a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61 ,273–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H.(1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L.& Kals, E. (2007). Mediation. Lehrbuch für Psychologen und Juristen(2. Aufl .) Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauta, A.& Kluwer, E.S. (2004). The use of questionnaires in conflict research. International Negotiation, 9 ,457–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkley, R.L. (1990). Dimensions of conflict: Disputant interpretations of conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75 ,117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkley, R.L. & Northcraft, G.B. (1994). Conflict frames of reference: Implications for dispute processes and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 37 ,193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, D.G. & Carnevale, P.J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regnet, E.(2001). Konflikte in Organisationen. Formen, Funktion und Bewältigung(2. Aufl .). Göttingen: Verlag für Angewandte Psychologie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J.Z., Pruitt, D.G. & Kim, S.H. (1994). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement(2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüttinger, B. & Sauer, J. (2000). Konflikt und Konflikt lösen. Kritische Situationen erkennen und bewältigen(3. Aufl .). Leonberg: Rosenberger Fachverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwickerath, J., Carls, W., Zielke, M. & Hackhausen, W. (Hrsg.). (2004). Mobbing am Arbeitsplatz. Grundlagen, Beratungs- und Behandlungskonzepte. Lengerich: Pabst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P.E. & Bruk-Lee, V. (2008). Conflict, health, and well being. In C. K. De Dreu & M. J. Gelfand (Eds.), The psychology of conflict and conflict management in organizations(pp. 267–289). New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L.L. (Ed.). (2006). Negotiation theory and research. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L.L. & Fox, C.R. (2001). Negotiation within and between groups in organizations: Levels of analysis. In M.E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research(pp. 221–266). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D.(1998). Cooperative and competitive goal approach to conflict: Accomplishments and challenges. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 47 ,285–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vliert, E. (1997). Complex interpersonal conflict behaviour: Theoretical frontiers. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vliert, E. (1998). Conflict and conflict management. In P.J.D. Drenth, H. Thierry & C.J. de Wolff (Eds.), Handbook of work and organizational psychology, vol. 3: Personnel psychology (2nd ed., pp. 351–376). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vliert, E. & Janssen, O. (2001). Description, explanation, and prescription of intragroup conflict behaviors. In M.E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research(pp. 267–297). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Solga .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Medizin Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Solga, M. (2011). Konflikte in Organisationen. In: Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie. Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16972-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics