Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Formen des Arbeitsverhaltens

  • Chapter
Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie

Part of the book series: Springer-Lehrbuch ((SLB))

Zusammenfassung

Arbeitsverhalten ist ein Schlüsselbegriff der Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie – methodisch betrachtet ist das Verhalten in der Arbeit die wichtigste abhängige Variable, die es zu erklären und zu prognostizieren gilt. Der Grund dafür liegt natürlich in der Bedeutung des Arbeitsverhaltens für die ganze Organisation: Unternehmen brauchen Mitarbeiter, die ein optimales Arbeitsverhalten zeigen, um ihre Ziele zu erreichen, die für ihr Überleben notwendigen Produkte und Dienstleistungen herzustellen und dabei möglichst Wettbewerbsvorteile zu erringen. Dies zeigt bereits, dass gewöhnlich bei dem Begriff Arbeitsverhalten spontan an die Leistung der Mitarbeiter gedacht wird. Nimmt man aber den Begriff weiter im Sinne des Verhaltens in der Arbeit, zeigt sich schnell, dass zum Arbeitsverhalten sehr viel mehr zählt als »nur« die Bewältigung der zugewiesenen Aufgaben. Offensichtlich ist Arbeitsverhalten ein mehrdimensionales Konzept, das im Folgenden etwas aufgeschlüsselt wird.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Avila, R.A., Fern, E.F. & Mann, O.K. (1988). Unraveling criteria for assessing the performance of sales people: A causal analysis.Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 8,45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brief, A.P. & Motowidlo, S.J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors.Academy of Management Review, 11,710–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borman, W.C. & Motowidlo, S.J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W.C. Borman (Eds.),Personnel selection in organizations(pp. 71–98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J.P., McCloy, R.A., Oppler, S.H. & Sager, C.E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt, W.C. Borman et al. (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations(pp. 35–69). San Francisco, CA.: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conlon, D.E., Meyer, C.J. & Nowakowski, J.M. (2005). How does organizational justice affect performance, withdrawal, and counterproductive behavior? In J. Greenberg & J.A. Colquitt (Eds.),Handbook of organizational justice(pp. 301–327). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalal, R.S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology, 90,1241–1255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, M.E., Ganster, D.C. & Pagon, M. (2002). Social undermining in the workplace.Academy of Management Journal, 45,331–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M.& Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century.Research in Organizational Behavior, 23,133–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, J.M. & Brief, A.P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship.Psychological Bulletin, 112,310–329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M.R. & Hirschi, T. (1990).A general theory of crime.Stanford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruys, M.L. & Sackett, P.R. (2003). Investigating the dimensionality of counterproductive work behavior.International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11,30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joireman, J., Kamdar, D., Daniels, D. & Duell, B. (2006). Good citizens to the end? It depends: Empathy and concern with future consequences moderate the impact of a short-term time horizon on organizational citizenship behaviours.Journal of Applied Psychology, 91,1307–1320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D.(1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9,131–146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keashly, L.& Harvey, S. (2005). Emotional abuse in the workplace. In S. Fox & P.E. Spector (Eds.),Counterproductive work behavior. Investigations of actors and targets(pp. 201–235). Washington, DC: APA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, S., Kaschube, J. & Fisch, R. (2003).Eigenverantwortung in Organisationen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • LePine, J.A., Erez, A. & Johnson, D.E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 87,52–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, B.(2000).Kontraproduktives Verhalten im Betrieb: Eine individuumsbezogene Perspektive. Göttingen:VAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, B.& Schuler, H. (2004). Antecedents of counterproductive behavior at work: A general perspective.Journal of Applied Psychology, 89,647–660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, B.& Schuler, H. (2006). Leistungsbeurteilung. In H. Schuler (Hrsg.),Lehrbuch der Personalpsychologie(S. 431–469). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, G.F. & Bierhoff, H.W. (1994). Arbeitsengagement aus freien Stücken. Psychologische Aspekte eines sensiblen Phänomens. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 8,367–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerdinger, F.W. (2004). Organizational Citizenship Behavior und Extra-Rollenverhalten. In H. Schuler (Hrsg.),Organisationspsychologie 2 – Gruppe und Organisation. Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Bd. D/III/4(S. 293–333). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerdinger, F.W. (2008).Unternehmensschädigendes Verhalten erkennen und verhindern. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, O.(2006).MikropolitikundMoralin Organisationen. Herausforderung der Ordnung.Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, J.H. & Baron, R.A. (2005). Aggression in the workplace: A social-psychological perspective. In S. Fox & P.E. Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior. Investigations of actors and targets(pp. 13–39). Washington, DC: APA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D.W. (1988).Organizationalcitizenshipbehavior.Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C.M., Andersson, L.M. & Porath, C.L. (2005). Workplace incivility. In S. Fox & P.E. Spector (Eds.),Counterproductive work behavior. Investigations of actors and targets(pp. 177–199). Washington, DC: APA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Paine, J.B. & Bachrach, D.G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research.Journal of Management, 26,513–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S.L. & Bennett, R.J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study.Academy of Management Journal, 38,555–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S.L. & Greenberg, J. (1998). Employees behaving badly: Dimensions, determinants and dilemmas in the study of workplace deviance.Trends in Organizational Behavior, 5,1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P.R. & DeVore, C. (2001). Counterproductive behaviors at work. In N. Anderson, D.S. Ones, H.K. Sinangil & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.),Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology, vol. 1(pp. 145–164). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K.-H. & Kleinbeck, U. (2004). Leistung und Leistungsförderung. In H. Schuler (Hrsg.),Organisationspsychologie 1 – Grundlagen und Personalpsychologie. Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Bd. D/III/3(S. 893–945). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, M.E., Ordónez, L. & Douma, B. (2004). Goal setting as a motivator of unethical behavior.Academy of Management Journal, 47,422–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D.P. & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice.Journal of Applied Psychology, 82,434–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C.A., Organ, D.W. & Near, J.P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents.Journal of Applied Psychology, 68,653–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solga, M.& Blickle, G. (2003). Mikropolitische Gegenreaktionen auf eigenverantwortliches Handeln. In S. Koch, J. Kaschube & R. Fisch (Hrsg.),(S. 271–282). Göttingen: Verlag für Angewandte Psychologie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnentag, S.& Frese, M. (2002). Performance concepts and performance theory. In S. Sonnentag (Ed.),Psychological management of individual performance(pp. 3–25). New York: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P.E. (1997). The role of frustration in antisocial behavior at work. In R.A. Giacalone & J. Greenberg (Eds.),Antisocial behavior in organizations(pp. 1–17). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyne, L. & Ang, S. (1998). Organizational citizenship behavior of contigent workers in Singapore.Academy of Management Journal, 41,692–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vardi, Y.& Weitz, E. (2004).Misbehavior in organizations. Theory, research, and management.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswesvaran, C., Schmidt, F.L. & Ones, D.S. (2005). Is there a general factor in ratings of job performance? A meta-analytic framework for disentangling substantive and error influences.Journal of Applied Psychology, 90,108–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walz, S.& Niehoff, B.P. (1996). Organizational citizenship behaviors and their effects on organizational effectiveness in limited-menu restaurants.Academy of Management Proceedings, 307–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderer, R.& Kuhn, Th. (1995). Unternehmer gesucht.Personalwirtschaft, 47 (1),16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, D.& Einarsen, St. (2005). Mobbing at work: Escalated conflicts in organizations. In S. Fox & P.E. Spector (Eds.),Counterproductive work behavior. Investigations of actors and targets(pp. 237–270). Washington, DC: APA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl für Wirtschaft sund Organisationspsychologie, Universität Rostock, Ulmenstr. 69, 18057, Rostock

    Friedemann W. Nerdinger

Authors
  1. Friedemann W. Nerdinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Friedemann W. Nerdinger .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Medizin Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nerdinger, F. (2011). Formen des Arbeitsverhaltens. In: Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie. Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16972-4_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation