Abstract
In this paper we extend an existent approach to formalizing agents’ behavior in collaborative dialogues. We build on an existent abstract dialogue framework, for which some collaborative semantics have already been defined, and contribute by developing a new semantics which covers the in-betweens of two of the previous, namely the basic collaborative and the full collaborative semantics. The new intermediate semantics captures the behavior of agents who make an effort toward achieving the highest degree of collaboration (full collaborative semantics) although they do not always succeed. We provide a complete example of the proposed semantics using Propositional Logic Programming with Negation as Failure.
This research is partially supported by Sec. Gral. de Ciencia y Tecnología de la Univ. Nac. del Sur (PGI 24/ZN18) and CONICET (PIP 112-200801-02798).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M., Amgoud, L.: Properties and Complexity of Some Formal Inter-Agent Dialogues. J. Log. Comput. (2003)
Walton, D., Krabbe, E.: Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. State University of New York Press, Albany (1995)
Kraus, S., Sycara, K., Evenchik, A.: Reaching Agreements through Argumentation: A Logical Model and Implementation. Artificial Intelligence (1998)
Amgoud, L., Maudet, N., Parsons, S.: Modelling Dialogues Using Argumentation. In: ICMAS 2000, Boston, USA (2000)
Parsons, S., Amgoud, L., Wooldridge, M.: An Analysis of Formal Inter-agent Dialogues. In: AAMAS 2002, Bologna, Italy (2002)
Amgoud, L., Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M.: On the Formal Outcomes of Formal Inter-agent Dialogues. In: AAMAS 2003, Melbourne, Australie (2003)
Amgoud, L., Prade, H., Belabbes, S.: Towards a Formal Framework for the Search of a Consensus Between Autonomous Agents. In: AAMAS 2005, Utrecht (2005)
Amgoud, L., Dimopoulos, Y., Moraitis, P.: A Unified and General Framework for Argumentation Based Negotiation. In: AAMAS 2007, Honolulu, Hawai’i (2007)
Black, E., Hunter, A.: A Generative Inquiry Dialogue System. In: AAMAS 2007, Honolulu, Hawai’i (2007)
Amgoud, L., de Saint-Cyr, F.D.: Measures for Persuasion Dialogs: A Preliminary Investigation. In: COMMA 2008, Toulouse - France (2008)
Parsons, S., McBurney, P., Sklar, E., Wooldridge, M.: On the Relevance of Utterances in Formal Inter-agent Dialogues. In: AAMAS 2007, Honolulu, Hawai’i (2007)
Prakken, H.: On Dialogue Systems with Speech Acts, Arguments, and Counterarguments. In: JELIA (2000)
Prakken, H.: Relating Protocols for Dynamic Dispute with Logics for Defeasible Argumentation. Synthese (2001)
Prakken, H.: Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation. J. Log. Comput. (2005)
Marcos, M.J., Falappa, M.A., Simari, G.R.: Semantically Characterizing Collaborative Behavior in an Abstract Dialogue Framework. In: Link, S., Prade, H. (eds.) FoIKS 2010. LNCS, vol. 5956, pp. 173–190. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Marcos, M.J., Falappa, M.A., Simari, G.R. (2010). A Half-Way Semantics toward Collaborative Behavior in Interagent Dialogues. In: Kuri-Morales, A., Simari, G.R. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence – IBERAMIA 2010. IBERAMIA 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6433. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16952-6_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16952-6_36
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16951-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16952-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)