Skip to main content

Save Up to 99% of Your Time in Mapping Validation

  • Conference paper
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems, OTM 2010 (OTM 2010)

Abstract

Identifying semantic correspondences between different vocabularies has been recognized as a fundamental step towards achieving interoperability. Several manual and automatic techniques have been recently proposed. Fully manual approaches are very precise, but extremely costly. Conversely, automatic approaches tend to fail when domain specific background knowledge is needed. Consequently, they typically require a manual validation step. Yet, when the number of computed correspondences is very large, the validation phase can be very expensive. In order to reduce the problems above, we propose to compute the minimal set of correspondences, that we call the minimal mapping, which are sufficient to compute all the other ones. We show that by concentrating on such correspondences we can save up to 99% of the manual checks required for validation.

This paper is a variation of the paper [4] presented at the non-archival 4th Ontology Matching Workshop 2009.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: Ontology Matching. Springer, New York (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Giunchiglia, F., Marchese, M., Zaihrayeu, I.: Encoding Classifications into Lightweight Ontologies. Journal of Data Semantics 8, 57–81 (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P., Yatskevich, M.: Discovering missing background knowledge in ontology matching. In: Proc. of ECAI 2006, pp. 382–386 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Giunchiglia, F., Maltese, V., Autayeu, A.: Computing minimal mappings. At the 4th Ontology Matching Workshop at the ISWC 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Robertson, G.G., Czerwinski, M.P., Churchill, J.E.: Visualization of mappings between schemas. In: Proc. of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Falconer, S., Storey, M.: A cognitive support framework for ontology mapping. In: Aberer, K., Choi, K.-S., Noy, N., Allemang, D., Lee, K.-I., Nixon, L.J.B., Golbeck, J., Mika, P., Maynard, D., Mizoguchi, R., Schreiber, G., Cudré-Mauroux, P. (eds.) ASWC 2007 and ISWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 114–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Halevy, A.: Why your data won’t mix. ACM Queue 3(8), 50–58 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Katifory, A., Halatsis, C., Lepouras, G., Vassilakis, C., Giannopoulou, E.: Ontology visualization methods - a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 39(4), Article No. 10 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ranganathan, S.R.: The Colon Classification. In: Artandi, S. (ed.) Rutgers Series on Systems for the Intellectual Organization of Information, vol. IV. Graduate School of Library Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Giunchiglia, F., Zaihrayeu, I.: Lightweight ontologies. In: LNCS, S. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Database Systems (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Giunchiglia, F., Dutta, B., Maltese, V.: Faceted lightweight ontologies. In: Borgida, A.T., Chaudhri, V.K., Giorgini, P., Yu, E.S. (eds.) Conceptual Modeling: Foundations and Applications. LNCS, vol. 5600, pp. 36–51. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Giunchiglia, F., Soergel, D., Maltese, V., Bertacco, A.: Mapping large-scale Knowledge Organization Systems (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: Ten Challenges for Ontology Matching. In: Proc. of the 7th Int. Conference on Ontologies, Databases, and Applications of Semantics, ODBASE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shvaiko, P., Giunchiglia, F., da Silva, P.P., McGuinness, D.L.: Web Explanations for Semantic Heterogeneity Discovery. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) ESWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3532, pp. 303–317. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Koch, T., Neuroth, H., Day, M.: Renardus: Cross-browsing European subject gateways via a common classification system (DDC). In: McIlwaine, I.C. (ed.) Proc. of the IFLA Satellite Meeting on Subject Retrieval in a Networked Environment, pp. 25–33 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vizine-Goetz, D., Hickey, C., Houghton, A., Thompson, R.: Vocabulary Mapping for Terminology Services. Journal of Digital Information 4(4), Article No. 272 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Whitehead, C.: Mapping LCSH into Thesauri: the AAT Model. In: Beyond the Book: Extending MARC for Subject Access, p. 81 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  18. O’Neill, E., Chan, L.: FAST (Faceted Application for Subject Technology): A Simplified LCSH-based Vocabulary. In: World Library and Information Congress: 69th IFLA General Conference and Council, Berlin, August 1-9 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nicholson, D., Dawson, A., Shiri, A.: HILT: A pilot terminology mapping service with a DDC spine. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 42(3/4), 187–200 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lauser, B., Johannsen, G., Caracciolo, C., Keizer, J., van Hage, W.R., Mayr, P.: Comparing human and automatic thesaurus mapping approaches in the agricultural domain. In: Proc. Int’l Conf. on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Avesani, P., Giunchiglia, F., Yatskevich, M.: A Large Scale Taxonomy Mapping Evaluation. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 67–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Giunchiglia, F., Yatskevich, M., Shvaiko, P.: Semantic Matching: algorithms and implementation. Journal on Data Semantics IX (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stuckenschmidt, H., Serafini, L., Wache, H.: Reasoning about Ontology Mappings. In: Proc. of the ECAI 2006 Workshop on Contextual Representation and Reasoning (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Meilicke, C., Stuckenschmidt, H., Tamilin, A.: Improving automatically created map-pings using logical reasoning. In: Proc. of the 1st International Workshop on Ontology Matching OM 2006, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 225 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Meilicke, C., Stuckenschmidt, H., Tamilin, A.: Reasoning support for mapping revision. Journal of Logic and Computation (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Borgida, A., Serafini, L.: Distributed Description Logics: Assimilating Information from Peer Sources. Journal on Data Semantics, 153–184

    Google Scholar 

  27. Giunchiglia, F., Yatskevich, M., Shvaiko, P.: Semantic Matching: algorithms and implementation. Journal on Data Semantics IX (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Maltese, V., Giunchiglia, F., Autayeu, A. (2010). Save Up to 99% of Your Time in Mapping Validation. In: Meersman, R., Dillon, T., Herrero, P. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems, OTM 2010. OTM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6427. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16949-6_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16949-6_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16948-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16949-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics