Skip to main content

Argumentation-Based Preference Modelling with Incomplete Information

  • Conference paper
Book cover Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems (CLIMA 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6214))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

No intelligent decision support system functions even remotely without knowing the preferences of the user. A major problem is that the way average users think about and formulate their preferences does not match the utility-based quantitative frameworks currently used in decision support systems. For the average user qualitative models are a better fit. This paper presents an argumentation-based framework for the modelling of, and automated reasoning about multi-issue preferences of a qualitative nature. The framework presents preferences according to the lexicographic ordering that is well-understood by humans. The main contribution of the paper is that it shows how to reason about preferences when only incomplete information is available. An adequate strategy is proposed that allows reasoning with incomplete information and it is shown how to incorporate this strategy into the argumentation-based framework for modelling preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amgoud, L., Maudet, N., Parsons, S.: Modelling dialogues using argumentation. In: Proc. ICMAS (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Dunne, P.E.: Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 171, 619–641 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Boutilier, C.: Toward a logic for qualitative decision theory. In: Proc. KR, pp. 75–86 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boutilier, C., Brafman, R.I., Domshlak, C., Hoos, H.H., Poole, D.: CP-nets: A tool for representing and reasoning with conditional ceteris paribus preference statements. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 21, 135–191 (2004)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Brewka, G.: A rank based description language for qualitative preferences. In: Proc. ECAI (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brewka, G., Benferhat, S., Le Berre, D.: Qualitative choice logic. Artificial Intelligence 157(1-2), 203–237 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Coste-Marquis, S., Lang, J., Liberatore, P., Marquis, P.: Expressive power and succinctness of propositional languages for preference representation. In: Proc. KR, pp. 203–212 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Doyle, J., Thomason, R.H.: Background to qualitative decision theory. AI Magazine 20(2), 55–68 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Possibility theory as a basis for qualitative decision theory. In: Proc. IJCAI (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77, 321–357 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaci, S., van der Torre, L.: Preference-based argumentation: Arguments supporting multiple values. Int. J. of Approximate Reasoning 48, 730–751 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H.: Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value trade-offs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, F.: Changing for the Better: Preference Dynamics and Agent Diversity. PhD thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Prakken, H.: A study of accrual of arguments, with applications to evidential reasoning. In: Proc. ICAIL, pp. 85–94 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Prakken, H., Sartor, G.: Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7, 25–75 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Rahwan, I., Ramchurn, S.D., Jennings, N.R., McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Sonenberg, L.: Argumentation-based negotiation. Knowledge Engineering Review 18(4), 343–375 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Visser, W., Hindriks, K.V., Jonker, C.M. (2010). Argumentation-Based Preference Modelling with Incomplete Information. In: Dix, J., Fisher, M., Novák, P. (eds) Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems. CLIMA 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6214. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16867-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16867-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16866-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16867-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics