Skip to main content

The Shifting Focus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Space Security Law
  • 900 Accesses

Abstract

Firstly, any academic treatment of air law and policy should recognize that air law and space law are closely inter-related in some areas and that both these disciplines have to be viewed in the 21st century within the changing face of international law and politics. Both air law and space law are disciplines that are grounded on principles of public international law, which is increasingly becoming different from what it was a few decades ago. We no longer think of this area of the law as a set of fixed rules, even if such rules have always been a snapshot of the law as it stands at a given moment. Fundamentally, and at its core, international law was considered in simple terms as the law binding upon States in their relations with one another.1 A definition of international law was first given by the Provisional International Court of Justice in 1927 in the celebrated Lotus case when the World Court said:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Jennings (1990), p. 513.

  2. 2.

    (1927) P.C.I.J. Ser. A, No. 9, p. 18.

  3. 3.

    International law itself is divided into private and public international law, the former being also referred to as conflict of laws and the latter just termed International law. See Shaw (2003), p. 1.

  4. 4.

    Jennings (1990), p. 521.

  5. 5.

    See Article 10 and 11(1) of the United Nations Charter, which alludes to the General Assembly making recommendations to the member States. Also, Johnson (1955–1956), p. 97.

  6. 6.

    See Article 36(2) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, which calls for States Parties to the Statute to declare consensually that they recognize the jurisdiction of the Court.

  7. 7.

    [1989] 3. W.L.R. 969 (H.L).

  8. 8.

    [1989] 3. W.L.R. 969 (H.L) at p. 1014.

  9. 9.

    Lowe (2003), pp. 859–871 at 859.

  10. 10.

    Arend (1999), p. 26.

  11. 11.

    Higgins (1999), p. 1.

  12. 12.

    Bull (1977), p. 128.

  13. 13.

    Freidman (1964), p. 213.

  14. 14.

    Kennedy (1988), p. 8.

  15. 15.

    Purvis (1991), p. 115.

  16. 16.

    Arend (1999), p. 27.

  17. 17.

    [1942] AC 206.

  18. 18.

    [1951] AC 66. However, it must be noted that the Hands off the Executive approach was rekindled in the 1977 case of Rv Secretary of State ex parte Hosenball, a deportee case where Lord Denning said that when there was a conflict of interest between the interests of national security on the one hand and the freedom of the individual on the other, the balance between the two should be determined by the Home Secretary who is entrusted this power by Parliament. See [1977] IWLR 766 at 783.

  19. 19.

    General Assembly Resolution 2625 (XXV).

  20. 20.

    Bull (1977), p. 13.

  21. 21.

    Hurrell (1992), p. 73.

  22. 22.

    Quoted in Morganthau and Kenneth (1950), p. 24.

  23. 23.

    PCIJ Series A/B, No. 53, at pp. 53ff.

  24. 24.

    www.oosa.unvienna.org/index.html.

References

  • Arend AC (1999) Legal rules and international society. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 26

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull H (1977) The Anarchical Society. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 128

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidman W (1964) The changing structure of International Law. Butterworths, London, 213

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins R (1999) Problems and process: international law and how we use it. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell A (1992) International society and the study of regimes: a reflective approach. In: Rittberger V (ed) Regime theory and international relations, vol 49. Butterworths, Sydney, p 73

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings RY (1990) An international lawyer takes stock. Int Comp Law Q 39(3):513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson D (1955–1956) The effect of the resolutions of the General Assembly of the United Nations. Br Yearb Int Law 32:97

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy D (1988) A new stream of international law scholarship. Wis Int Law J 7(1):8

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe V (2003) The Iraq crisis, what now? Int Comp Law Q 52(4):859–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morganthau H, Kenneth W (1950) Thompson, principles and problems of international politics. Knopf, New York, 24

    Google Scholar 

  • Purvis N (1991) Critical legal studies in International Law. Harv Int Law J 32(81):115

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw MN (2003) International law, 5th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruwantissa Abeyratne .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abeyratne, R. (2011). The Shifting Focus. In: Space Security Law. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16702-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics